Discussion:
Dimdows Decay Syndrome Continues
Add Reply
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2025-02-01 21:55:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Many years ago, a software engineer named Fred Brooks predicted that
some systems could get so complex that they would exceed a manageable
threshold of complexity, where every attempt to fix a bug would just
create new ones.

Microsoft passed this point a long time ago. Read this
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-11-24h2s-wild-ride-some-fixes-are-in-but-other-bugs-still-linger/>
and think: how many times have you heard of this sort of thing, just
in the past year? Some choice quotes:

When Microsoft rolled out another Windows 11 24H2 update for
January's Patch Tuesday, instead of fixing existing issues, the
update created more havoc, causing conflicts with audio,
Bluetooth, webcams, and more. But a preview update released on
Jan. 28 finally fixed several glitches -- both old and new.

But then qualifies this by saying:

But before you dive into the 2024 update, know that you may run
into some problems and conflicts. The new version has been plagued
by bugs that could prevent you from using Windows reliably and
effectively.

So fix some problems, add new ones. Conclusion:

The number of bugs in Windows 11 24H2 also seems greater than in
past annual Windows updates. The ongoing spread of one bug after
another and Microsoft's need to stall the update for many people
both point to a problem with this latest version.

Not the first time Windows has had this sort of trouble! It has become
a regular occurrence the past few years.
Joel
2025-02-02 00:07:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Many years ago, a software engineer named Fred Brooks predicted that
some systems could get so complex that they would exceed a manageable
threshold of complexity, where every attempt to fix a bug would just
create new ones.
Microsoft passed this point a long time ago. Read this
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-11-24h2s-wild-ride-some-fixes-are-in-but-other-bugs-still-linger/>
and think: how many times have you heard of this sort of thing, just
When Microsoft rolled out another Windows 11 24H2 update for
January's Patch Tuesday, instead of fixing existing issues, the
update created more havoc, causing conflicts with audio,
Bluetooth, webcams, and more. But a preview update released on
Jan. 28 finally fixed several glitches -- both old and new.
But before you dive into the 2024 update, know that you may run
into some problems and conflicts. The new version has been plagued
by bugs that could prevent you from using Windows reliably and
effectively.
The number of bugs in Windows 11 24H2 also seems greater than in
past annual Windows updates. The ongoing spread of one bug after
another and Microsoft's need to stall the update for many people
both point to a problem with this latest version.
Not the first time Windows has had this sort of trouble! It has become
a regular occurrence the past few years.
Good reasons to not use Winblows.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
Paul
2025-02-02 01:11:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Joel
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Many years ago, a software engineer named Fred Brooks predicted that
some systems could get so complex that they would exceed a manageable
threshold of complexity, where every attempt to fix a bug would just
create new ones.
Microsoft passed this point a long time ago. Read this
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-11-24h2s-wild-ride-some-fixes-are-in-but-other-bugs-still-linger/>
and think: how many times have you heard of this sort of thing, just
in the past year?
Good reasons to not use Winblows.
The 24H2 installed on the machine across the way from me,
without incident, about a week or two ago. There was nothing
of note, like new features that I can remember off hand.

My Daily Driver is still running 23H2.

And my Insider Disk is running 25H2, and it doesn't look
all that much different than 23H2.

All the OSes have a CoPilot icon, including the Win10 installs.
And, whether you have an MSA or not.

The CoPilot gave me a real golf whiff answer yesterday. I could
not believe an AI could write an answer like that. It did not
say "Sorry, I don't know the answer". But when I asked it about
the NTFS file system, rather than answer the question, it told
me to "get a hex editor and figure it out for yourself". Now,
isn't that why we invented AI ??? So... helpful. I would not
have thought of that, using my hex editor and reverse engineering
NTFS. I suppose the next answer will be "why don't you drive
to the Public Library and look that up, pal?".

I'm still waiting for my flying car (Jetsons). It will
have stubby wings, and tilt to one side as it goes around
corners.

Oh, and Facebook has taken the block off Distrowatch :-) Whew.
Who knew this timeline would have a happy ending. Single handedly,
Facebook almost wiped out the Year Of The Linux Desktop.

Paul
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2025-02-02 03:24:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Single handedly, Facebook almost wiped out the Year Of The Linux
Desktop.
We have already had over two years of the Linux Decktop.

The Linux-powered Steam Deck is the king of handheld PC gaming. None of
its Windows-running competitors even comes close.
Brian Gregory
2025-02-02 04:05:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
The Linux-powered Steam Deck is the king of handheld PC gaming. None of
its Windows-running competitors even comes close.
That's a matter of opinion.
The steam deck probably wins on value for money and on number of sales
but there are several significantly more powerful handheld gaming
devices which run Windows. For those people with the spare cash one of
the more expensive, more powerful Windows ones may be king because it
has better performance.

Personally I wouldn't spend that much money on something that's just for
games.
--
Brian Gregory (in England).
CrudeSausage
2025-02-02 12:19:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Brian Gregory
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
The Linux-powered Steam Deck is the king of handheld PC gaming. None of
its Windows-running competitors even comes close.
That's a matter of opinion.
The steam deck probably wins on value for money and on number of sales
but there are several significantly more powerful handheld gaming
devices which run Windows. For those people with the spare cash one of
the more expensive, more powerful Windows ones may be king because it
has better performance.
Personally I wouldn't spend that much money on something that's just for
games.
I would get the Windows ones myself since my library is across several
platforms. I also like to be assured that all my games run well, not
well enough. I was very disappointed by how poorly Black Mesa ran on
Linux compared to Windows.
--
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative
Chris Ahlstrom
2025-02-02 12:55:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Brian Gregory
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
The Linux-powered Steam Deck is the king of handheld PC gaming. None of
its Windows-running competitors even comes close.
That's a matter of opinion.
The steam deck probably wins on value for money and on number of sales
but there are several significantly more powerful handheld gaming
devices which run Windows.
Probably because they must be more powerful to support Windows :-D
Post by Brian Gregory
For those people with the spare cash one of
the more expensive, more powerful Windows ones may be king because it
has better performance.
Personally I wouldn't spend that much money on something that's just for
games.
Supposedly the Nintendo switch runs FreeBSD with a proprietary kernel.
Don't quote me on that.
--
The fact that it works is immaterial.
-- L. Ogborn
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2025-02-07 23:22:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Brian Gregory
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
The Linux-powered Steam Deck is the king of handheld PC gaming. None of
its Windows-running competitors even comes close.
That's a matter of opinion.
Likely also a matter of market share. Valve is holding its cards close to
its chest, but it looks like the Deck sells maybe 1½ million units per
year.
Post by Brian Gregory
The steam deck probably wins on value for money and on number of sales
but there are several significantly more powerful handheld gaming
devices which run Windows.
Yes, but the user experience (notwithstanding the promise of greater
compatibility) is poorer on these more expensive, less versatile machines.
The Steam Deck, being Linux, can run emulators for other gaming platforms,
and it seems about half of Steam Deck users take advantage of this.
Paul
2025-02-02 05:08:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Single handedly, Facebook almost wiped out the Year Of The Linux
Desktop.
We have already had over two years of the Linux Decktop.
The Linux-powered Steam Deck is the king of handheld PC gaming. None of
its Windows-running competitors even comes close.
Desktop Operating System Market Share Worldwide - January 2025
Windows
71.91%
OS X
15.02%
Unknown
7.43%
Linux
3.71%
Chrome OS
1.92%
FreeBSD
0%

Now, myself, I'm hoping I get a new computer based on <Unknown>.
I suppose there are a few people who don't know what their OS is :-)
"Unknown performs well, and presents a light light load to the hardware."

Paul
Java Jive
2025-02-02 13:57:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Paul
Desktop Operating System Market Share Worldwide - January 2025
Windows
71.91%
OS X
15.02%
Unknown
7.43%
Linux
3.71%
Chrome OS
1.92%
FreeBSD
0%
Now, myself, I'm hoping I get a new computer based on <Unknown>.
I suppose there are a few people who don't know what their OS is :-)
"Unknown performs well, and presents a light light load to the hardware."
I suspect that these stats are derived from web-browsing, collected by
firms such as StatCounter, and thus that the "unknown" percentage is
actually of those people who have locked down their PCs and browsers
well enough to give nothing away about their system.
--
Fake news kills!

I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website:
www.macfh.co.uk
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2025-02-07 23:19:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Paul
Desktop Operating System Market Share Worldwide - January 2025
You’re not getting these from Statcounter, are you?

<https://www.zdnet.com/article/how-popular-is-windows-11-statcounter-cant-tell-you-heres-why/>
DFS
2025-02-02 21:05:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Single handedly, Facebook almost wiped out the Year Of The Linux
Desktop.
We have already had over two years of the Linux Decktop.
The Linux-powered Steam Deck is the king of handheld PC gaming. None of
its Windows-running competitors even comes close.
More Larry Duh lies.

The Win11-based ASUS ROG Ally X is BETTER for gaming than the
highest-end Linux-based Steam Deck, though it costs $150 more.

For that extra money, you get:

1) more power to play high-end AAA games

2) a sharper, faster and smoother monitor

3) the ability to play games from Steam, Epic, GOG and Xbox. The
SteamDeck limits you to just Steam games.


https://www.engadget.com/gaming/best-handheld-gaming-system-140018863.html

https://store.steampowered.com/steamdeck


pwned
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2025-02-07 23:17:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by DFS
The Win11-based ASUS ROG Ally X is BETTER for gaming than the
highest-end Linux-based Steam Deck, though it costs $150 more.
Only USD150 more ... pocket change, compared to how much Dimdows users
normally have to pay to keep their systems working ...

Why not this one
<https://www.zdnet.com/home-and-office/home-entertainment/i-tested-msis-new-windows-handheld-and-would-consider-it-over-a-gaming-laptop/>:

Video games may be fine, but Windows 11 is another story. It seems
the OS wasn't meant to be condensed to fit onto a gaming handheld
because I ran into bugs. One time, after updating the software,
the in-game controls were disabled. I couldn't move my characters,
only the cursor. Fortunately, a quick reboot solved the problem.
Further optimization with Windows will hopefully improve the
experience.

Hope springs eternal, as they say ...
Mark Lloyd
2025-02-02 19:26:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 20:11:47 -0500, Paul wrote:

[snip]
All the OSes have a CoPilot icon, including the Win10 installs. And,
whether you have an MSA or not.
I have CoPilot in Edge on Linux.

[snip]
Joel
2025-02-02 19:49:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mark Lloyd
All the OSes have a CoPilot icon, including the Win10 installs. And,
whether you have an MSA or not.
I have CoPilot in Edge on Linux.
I could use Edge for that, but I have a Web app instead, see:

https://docs.webcatalog.io/en/articles/9943998-does-webcatalog-desktop-support-linux


It's no longer fully supported but I'm using it, it's $4.99 a month
for unlimited use, free for a certain number of apps.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
Paul
2025-02-02 20:29:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mark Lloyd
[snip]
All the OSes have a CoPilot icon, including the Win10 installs. And,
whether you have an MSA or not.
I have CoPilot in Edge on Linux.
[snip]
Makes sense, since it uses a datacenter for computation, and
anything that can run a webpage is good enough.

You should be aware, that they're de-tuning it as we speak.
The answers are coming back faster, and the last answer I got,
I need not bother wasting time any more on asking it questions.

Similarly, the AI doing the Google searches, is doing
a shit job, and I'm now looking at a situation were
I don't get any help at all from the Internet any more.

AI is definitely a "mission accomplished" thing. It's
trashed the Internet. Good work. Even if you paid $200 a month
for this, I doubt anything would change for you.

Paul
chrisv
2025-02-02 21:26:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Paul
Similarly, the AI doing the Google searches, is doing
a shit job, and I'm now looking at a situation were
I don't get any help at all from the Internet any more.
AI is definitely a "mission accomplished" thing. It's
trashed the Internet. Good work.
It's not done until it's trashed human society. Eventually we'll have
no reason to think, at all.
--
'He thinks "open" means bug free.' - Hadron Quark, lying shamelessly
Java Jive
2025-02-03 02:50:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by chrisv
Post by Paul
Similarly, the AI doing the Google searches, is doing
a shit job, and I'm now looking at a situation were
I don't get any help at all from the Internet any more.
AI is definitely a "mission accomplished" thing. It's
trashed the Internet. Good work.
It's not done until it's trashed human society. Eventually we'll have
no reason to think, at all.
That's nonsense ... It's like saying that because we have calculators
we don't need to be able to do any mental arithmetic, but you always
need to be able to check that the result you get is reasonable to be
sure that you haven't miskeyed something while entering the calculation.
Or it's like saying that because we have navigation apps no-one will
need to read maps or think about what the app is telling them to do.
Remember the German couple who drove off the end of a pier, and, IMS,
drowned, because their navigation app told them to?! Or the Euro
continental lorry drivers who enter "Gibraltar" into their nav apps and
end up in a tiny English village that happens to have the same name?!
Didn't any penny drop when they had to take a Channel ferry? Etc, etc.
--
Fake news kills!

I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website:
www.macfh.co.uk
rbowman
2025-02-03 04:03:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Java Jive
Remember the German couple who drove off the end of a pier, and, IMS,
drowned, because their navigation app told them to?! Or the Euro
continental lorry drivers who enter "Gibraltar" into their nav apps and
end up in a tiny English village that happens to have the same name?!
Didn't any penny drop when they had to take a Channel ferry? Etc, etc.
There have been several fatalities in the US from blindly following
directions. Often it's nothing as blatant as driving off a bridge but the
GPS shows an unmaintained road that is the shortest route. Bad choices
follow.

https://www.oregonlive.com/editors/2013/04/
kim_familys_fatal_oregon_journ.html

I have been through that area -- in the summer with a full tank of gas.
You're lulled into a false sense of security since it's a decent paved
road to a launch area on the Rogue River. After you cross the river it's
all twisty gravel roads with very little in the way of markings.
Jeff Barnett
2025-02-03 06:17:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Paul
Similarly, the AI doing the Google searches, is doing
a shit job, and I'm now looking at a situation were
I don't get any help at all from the Internet any more.
AI is definitely a "mission accomplished" thing. It's
trashed the Internet. Good work.
It's not done until it's trashed human society.  Eventually we'll have
no reason to think, at all.
That's nonsense  ...  It's like saying that because we have calculators
we don't need to be able to do any mental arithmetic, but you always
need to be able to check that the result you get is reasonable to be
sure that you haven't miskeyed something while entering the calculation.
 Or it's like saying that because we have navigation apps no-one will
need to read maps or think about what the app is telling them to do.
Remember the German couple who drove off the end of a pier, and, IMS,
drowned, because their navigation app told them to?!  Or the Euro
continental lorry drivers who enter "Gibraltar" into their nav apps and
end up in a tiny English village that happens to have the same name?!
Didn't any penny drop when they had to take a Channel ferry?  Etc, etc.
As best I only see, a significant portion of the younger generations can
neither do simple arithmetic nor 1-step logical deductions (or the
informal equivalents or approximations). In other words, they cannot
verify or validate much of the information presented to them. I see, as
a result, such moves as not accepting cash at many stories.

I asked an owner of a fast food place why. The answer: The schools
didn't teach them arithmetic and I think they are too old to learn! I
also recall an experience a few years ago. I selected some supplies at a
store in Marina del Rey (part of greater LA) and approached the cash
register where a vacant looking 20 something young lady was the cashier.
She laboriously rings up the items and the total comes to $19.99. I take
out my wallet, hand her a $20 bill and apologize for not having anything
smaller. She says nothing, does not crack a smile, and remains frozen
until the register tells her to give me a penny back. Still no reaction.

So you really think we, collectively, will be able to profit from
information that allows us to double check our computers? These are the
same folks who are frightened by vaccines and community health. (I know
there is a small number of people who have predictable poor reactions,
but they're generally not the ones spouting conspiracy theories.)

The promise that connectivity (the internet) would improve society and
its human inhabitants has been shown false. Rather, it has led to
intellectually laziness and polarization. Non-vetted results are repeat
as gospel and we are all manipulated and exploited. The point is that
the vast majority of us are entrenched in this madness and our brain's
off switch has been thrown.

We do not regain rationality when presented with quality information
unless we agree with it before it is presented to us. When I say "we" I
included all of us who have spent our lives using our brain; we all seem
to have these blind spots where we would rather beli
Java Jive
2025-02-03 13:16:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Jeff Barnett
Post by Paul
Similarly, the AI doing the Google searches, is doing
a shit job, and I'm now looking at a situation were
I don't get any help at all from the Internet any more.
AI is definitely a "mission accomplished" thing. It's
trashed the Internet. Good work.
It's not done until it's trashed human society.  Eventually we'll have
no reason to think, at all.
That's nonsense  ...  It's like saying that because we have
calculators we don't need to be able to do any mental arithmetic, but
you always need to be able to check that the result you get is
reasonable to be sure that you haven't miskeyed something while
entering the calculation.   Or it's like saying that because we have
navigation apps no-one will need to read maps or think about what the
app is telling them to do. Remember the German couple who drove off
the end of a pier, and, IMS, drowned, because their navigation app
told them to?!  Or the Euro continental lorry drivers who enter
"Gibraltar" into their nav apps and end up in a tiny English village
that happens to have the same name?! Didn't any penny drop when they
had to take a Channel ferry?  Etc, etc.
As best I only see, a significant portion of the younger generations can
neither do simple arithmetic nor 1-step logical deductions (or the
informal equivalents or approximations). In other words, they cannot
verify or validate much of the information presented to them.
That's not a generational thing, there are people like that in every
generation.
Post by Jeff Barnett
I see, as
a result, such moves as not accepting cash at many stories.
I asked an owner of a fast food place why. The answer: The schools
didn't teach them arithmetic and I think they are too old to learn! I
also recall an experience a few years ago. I selected some supplies at a
store in Marina del Rey (part of greater LA) and approached the cash
register where a vacant looking 20 something young lady was the cashier.
She laboriously rings up the items and the total comes to $19.99. I take
out my wallet, hand her a $20 bill and apologize for not having anything
smaller. She says nothing, does not crack a smile, and remains frozen
until the register tells her to give me a penny back. Still no reaction.
Again, there are dumb-asses in every generation.
Post by Jeff Barnett
So you really think we, collectively, will be able to profit from
information that allows us to double check our computers?
My post to which you are replying gave examples of what can happen if we
don't.
Post by Jeff Barnett
These are the
same folks who are frightened by vaccines and community health. (I know
there is a small number of people who have predictable poor reactions,
but they're generally not the ones spouting conspiracy theories.)
Yes, there's one of those living near to me, but, at a guess, he's in
he's 80s, so, again, not a generational thing. [His wife, a nice, kind
old dear, had a severe stroke a week or two after having a covid vaccine
and is now mentally much impaired. Understandably, but most probably
incorrectly, he links the vaccine and the stroke, whereas in truth she
may well have had the stroke even if she had not had the vaccine
beforehand. What happened to her is tragic, and they both deserve every
sympathy, but in all probability the two events are unrelated except by
coincidence.]
Post by Jeff Barnett
The promise that connectivity (the internet) would improve society and
its human inhabitants has been shown false. Rather, it has led to
intellectually laziness and polarization. Non-vetted results are repeat
as gospel and we are all manipulated and exploited.
Again, not a generational thing, people used to be just as
undiscriminating reading newspaper reports and watching TV reports. The
thing that the internet has changed is the speed of it all.
Post by Jeff Barnett
The point is that
the vast majority of us are entrenched in this madness and our brain's
off switch has been thrown.
We do not regain rationality when presented with quality information
unless we agree with it before it is presented to us. When I say "we" I
included all of us who have spent our lives using our brain; we all seem
to have these blind spots where we would rather believe than think.
The problem has always been compromising between saving mental effort -
so that you don't go through the laborious process of reinventing the
wheel every time you need to use one, you just reuse what is already
known - and assessing new information whose usefulness is as yet
unknown. No person or the wider society of which he/she is part could
ever make progress at either extreme of rethinking everything all the
time or taking everything new as 'good' without questioning it, the best
path forward has always been a compromise between those two extremes.
The internet has made this problem more obvious and thus magnified its
apparent importance, but it's always been a problem.
--
Fake news kills!

I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website:
www.macfh.co.uk
Joel
2025-02-08 01:03:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Paul
The CoPilot gave me a real golf whiff answer yesterday. I could
not believe an AI could write an answer like that. It did not
say "Sorry, I don't know the answer". But when I asked it about
the NTFS file system, rather than answer the question, it told
me to "get a hex editor and figure it out for yourself". Now,
isn't that why we invented AI ??? So... helpful. I would not
have thought of that, using my hex editor and reverse engineering
NTFS. I suppose the next answer will be "why don't you drive
to the Public Library and look that up, pal?".
Loading Image...


My take: it's pretty typical M$. They aren't gonna let their AI bot
give you that info, but then again it does know that at the end of the
day, nothing can prevent reverse engineering, it's even a necessity
with obsolete systems to emulate, for example, I'm reasonably sure if
I pirate the original Super Mario Bros. NES game, in an emulator,
Nintendo will let it slide.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
Andy Burns
2025-02-08 20:12:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Paul
when I asked it about
the NTFS file system, rather than answer the question, it told
me to "get a hex editor and figure it out for yourself". Now,
isn't that why we invented AI ??? So... helpful. I would not
have thought of that, using my hex editor and reverse engineering
NTFS. I suppose the next answer will be "why don't you drive
to the Public Library and look that up, pal?".
You could buy the Custer book, but it doesn't cover the newer features
such as reparse points or the altered permission inheritance ...
Paul
2025-02-09 02:06:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Paul
when I asked it about
the NTFS file system, rather than answer the question, it told
me to "get a hex editor and figure it out for yourself". Now,
isn't that why we invented AI ??? So... helpful. I would not
have thought of that, using my hex editor and reverse engineering
NTFS. I suppose the next answer will be "why don't you drive
to the Public Library and look that up, pal?".
You could buy the Custer book, but it doesn't cover the newer features such as reparse points or the altered permission inheritance ...
openspecs-windows_protocols-ms-fscc.pdf

IO_REPARSE_TAG_WOF 0x80000017

Used by the Windows Overlay filter, for either WIMBoot
or single-file compression. Server-side interpretation
only, not meaningful over the wire.

IO_REPARSE_TAG_ONEDRIVE 0x80000021 Not used.

I suspect even the Microsoft (derived) documentation
isn't up to date. It's like their WIM spec :-)

The basic idea, is they'll tease you with the value
of the tag, but the rest of it you have to reverse-engineer.

Paul
CrudeSausage
2025-02-02 12:11:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Joel
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Many years ago, a software engineer named Fred Brooks predicted that
some systems could get so complex that they would exceed a manageable
threshold of complexity, where every attempt to fix a bug would just
create new ones.
Microsoft passed this point a long time ago. Read this
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-11-24h2s-wild-ride-some-fixes-are-in-but-other-bugs-still-linger/>
and think: how many times have you heard of this sort of thing, just
When Microsoft rolled out another Windows 11 24H2 update for
January's Patch Tuesday, instead of fixing existing issues, the
update created more havoc, causing conflicts with audio,
Bluetooth, webcams, and more. But a preview update released on
Jan. 28 finally fixed several glitches -- both old and new.
But before you dive into the 2024 update, know that you may run
into some problems and conflicts. The new version has been plagued
by bugs that could prevent you from using Windows reliably and
effectively.
The number of bugs in Windows 11 24H2 also seems greater than in
past annual Windows updates. The ongoing spread of one bug after
another and Microsoft's need to stall the update for many people
both point to a problem with this latest version.
Not the first time Windows has had this sort of trouble! It has become
a regular occurrence the past few years.
Good reasons to not use Winblows.
Let's be honest for a second: every operating system introduces new bugs
when it fixes old ones.
--
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2025-02-07 21:34:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Let's be honest for a second: every operating system introduces new bugs
when it fixes old ones.
No, reasonably-designed code manages to decrease bugs in existing features
over time. Bugs in new features will happen, yes.

There is an old engineering adage: complexity arises, not so much from the
number of components, as from the number of potential interactions between
them.

Open-source systems tend to have clear separation of functions between
components, which helps keep unexpected interactions between them, in
particular, down to a minimum. This allows them to scale to massive
application deployments, like million-node supercomputers or running the
entire Internet.

The same cannot be said for Microsoft Windows. The original Windows NT
concept may have had some kind of conceptual integrity at one point. But
that has since been lost under an ongoing wave of short-sighted management
decisions driven entirely by pursuit of immediate profits.

And today, Microsoft’s own experts have no clear idea what Windows is
doing any more. Why do you think it needs to reboot about five times just
to do an OS install?
CrudeSausage
2025-02-08 01:29:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Let's be honest for a second: every operating system introduces new bugs
when it fixes old ones.
No, reasonably-designed code manages to decrease bugs in existing features
over time. Bugs in new features will happen, yes.
There is an old engineering adage: complexity arises, not so much from the
number of components, as from the number of potential interactions between
them.
Open-source systems tend to have clear separation of functions between
components, which helps keep unexpected interactions between them, in
particular, down to a minimum. This allows them to scale to massive
application deployments, like million-node supercomputers or running the
entire Internet.
The same cannot be said for Microsoft Windows. The original Windows NT
concept may have had some kind of conceptual integrity at one point. But
that has since been lost under an ongoing wave of short-sighted management
decisions driven entirely by pursuit of immediate profits.
And today, Microsoft’s own experts have no clear idea what Windows is
doing any more. Why do you think it needs to reboot about five times just
to do an OS install?
I have to admit those reboots are a nuisance. Of course, Fedora rebooted
pretty often too. While it doesn't seem to be *necessary* to reboot
after an update, practically all of them recommended it.
--
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2025-02-08 06:36:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
And today, Microsoft’s own experts have no clear idea what Windows is
doing any more. Why do you think it needs to reboot about five times
just to do an OS install?
I have to admit those reboots are a nuisance. Of course, Fedora rebooted
pretty often too.
There are ways to minimize that. Doesn’t RHEL support kexec, which allows
the old Linux kernel to pass control to the new one without actually
disrupting the userland?
vallor
2025-02-08 08:44:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 06:36:16 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
And today, Microsoft’s own experts have no clear idea what Windows is
doing any more. Why do you think it needs to reboot about five times
just to do an OS install?
I have to admit those reboots are a nuisance. Of course, Fedora
rebooted pretty often too.
There are ways to minimize that. Doesn’t RHEL support kexec, which
allows the old Linux kernel to pass control to the new one without
actually disrupting the userland?
You're thinking of live kernel patching. kexec_load(2) load a kernel
that you can have execute if the current kernel crashes. You do this
for debugging, usually.

ObWindows: There was a post recently about various virtualization
solutions. Linux subsystem for Windows now uses HyperV, and I'm
wondering if there is a native manager that Windows includes for other
HyperV guests?
--
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
OS: Linux 6.13.1 Release: Mint 22.1 Mem: 258G
"These shoes look like Frankenstein's hand-me-downs."
Paul
2025-02-08 11:41:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by vallor
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 06:36:16 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
And today, Microsoft’s own experts have no clear idea what Windows is
doing any more. Why do you think it needs to reboot about five times
just to do an OS install?
I have to admit those reboots are a nuisance. Of course, Fedora
rebooted pretty often too.
There are ways to minimize that. Doesn’t RHEL support kexec, which
allows the old Linux kernel to pass control to the new one without
actually disrupting the userland?
You're thinking of live kernel patching. kexec_load(2) load a kernel
that you can have execute if the current kernel crashes. You do this
for debugging, usually.
ObWindows: There was a post recently about various virtualization
solutions. Linux subsystem for Windows now uses HyperV, and I'm
wondering if there is a native manager that Windows includes for other
HyperV guests?
That would be on the Professional SKU, at a minimum.

[Picture]

Loading Image...

Paul
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2025-02-08 23:42:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by vallor
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 06:36:16 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Doesn’t RHEL support kexec, which
allows the old Linux kernel to pass control to the new one without
actually disrupting the userland?
You're thinking of live kernel patching. kexec_load(2) load a kernel
that you can have execute if the current kernel crashes. You do this
for debugging, usually.
Bit more than that <https://manpages.debian.org/kexec_load(2)>:

The kexec_load() system call loads a new kernel that can be
executed later by reboot(2).

And one of the functions of the latter
<https://manpages.debian.org/reboot(2)> is:

LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_KEXEC
(RB_KEXEC, 0x45584543, since Linux 2.6.13). Execute a kernel
that has been loaded earlier with kexec_load(2).
vallor
2025-02-09 00:25:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 23:42:11 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by vallor
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 06:36:16 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Doesn’t RHEL support kexec, which allows the old Linux kernel to pass
control to the new one without actually disrupting the userland?
You're thinking of live kernel patching. kexec_load(2) load a kernel
that you can have execute if the current kernel crashes. You do this
for debugging, usually.
The kexec_load() system call loads a new kernel that can be executed
later by reboot(2).
And one of the functions of the latter
LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_KEXEC
(RB_KEXEC, 0x45584543, since Linux 2.6.13). Execute a kernel that
has been loaded earlier with kexec_load(2).
I don't see your point. (That's what I said.)

It doesn't load "without disturbing the userland"...
--
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
OS: Linux 6.13.1 Release: Mint 22.1 Mem: 258G
"Why is "easy listening" so hard to listen to?"
CrudeSausage
2025-02-08 14:05:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
And today, Microsoft’s own experts have no clear idea what Windows is
doing any more. Why do you think it needs to reboot about five times
just to do an OS install?
I have to admit those reboots are a nuisance. Of course, Fedora rebooted
pretty often too.
There are ways to minimize that. Doesn’t RHEL support kexec, which allows
the old Linux kernel to pass control to the new one without actually
disrupting the userland?
I don't know, it might. Like I said, you don't have to reboot but they
recommend it. We expect that kind of behaviour from Windows, so it's not
that cumbersome when it happens in Linux too.
--
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2025-02-08 23:44:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Doesn’t RHEL support kexec, which
allows the old Linux kernel to pass control to the new one without
actually disrupting the userland?
I don't know, it might.
The last openSUSE install I did, some years ago, I remember it switched
almost seamlessly from running off the installation media to running off
the just-created (minimal) installation, and continued adding packages
from there. There was no perceptible reboot stage at all.

Just to point out this is a common Linux kernel feature, not something
specific to a particular distro.
Joel
2025-02-09 00:05:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Doesn’t RHEL support kexec, which
allows the old Linux kernel to pass control to the new one without
actually disrupting the userland?
I don't know, it might.
The last openSUSE install I did, some years ago, I remember it switched
almost seamlessly from running off the installation media to running off
the just-created (minimal) installation, and continued adding packages
from there. There was no perceptible reboot stage at all.
Just to point out this is a common Linux kernel feature, not something
specific to a particular distro.
"Perceptible reboot stage"? What the hell does that mean? It either
did or did not reboot.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
vallor
2025-02-09 13:58:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 23:44:41 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Doesn’t RHEL support kexec, which allows the old Linux kernel to pass
control to the new one without actually disrupting the userland?
I don't know, it might.
The last openSUSE install I did, some years ago, I remember it switched
almost seamlessly from running off the installation media to running off
the just-created (minimal) installation, and continued adding packages
from there. There was no perceptible reboot stage at all.
Just to point out this is a common Linux kernel feature, not something
specific to a particular distro.
Not sure why that would need kexec -- more likely, it used
chroot(8) or pivot_root(8).
--
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
OS: Linux 6.13.1 Release: Mint 22.1 Mem: 258G
"There's no future in time travel"
Paul
2025-02-09 02:18:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
And today, Microsoft’s own experts have no clear idea what Windows is
doing any more. Why do you think it needs to reboot about five times
just to do an OS install?
I have to admit those reboots are a nuisance. Of course, Fedora rebooted
pretty often too.
There are ways to minimize that. Doesn’t RHEL support kexec, which allows
the old Linux kernel to pass control to the new one without actually
disrupting the userland?
I don't know, it might. Like I said, you don't have to reboot but they recommend it. We expect that kind of behaviour from Windows, so it's not that cumbersome when it happens in Linux too.
Your personal policy may depend on your machine.

On a server with ECC and the background scrubber engaged,
you might laugh at reboots as "unnecessary" and "bourgeois".

On a desktop system where the RAM is protected by nothing,
rebooting is a good way of refreshing the RAM image.

Even if computers had static RAM instead of dynamic RAM,
the bus signal integrity means the error rate is not zero.
With static RAM, the memory might be a tiny bit more
resistant to cosmic ray events.

Paul
Joel
2025-02-08 02:05:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Let's be honest for a second: every operating system introduces new bugs
when it fixes old ones.
No, reasonably-designed code manages to decrease bugs in existing features
over time. Bugs in new features will happen, yes.
There is an old engineering adage: complexity arises, not so much from the
number of components, as from the number of potential interactions between
them.
Open-source systems tend to have clear separation of functions between
components, which helps keep unexpected interactions between them, in
particular, down to a minimum. This allows them to scale to massive
application deployments, like million-node supercomputers or running the
entire Internet.
The same cannot be said for Microsoft Windows. The original Windows NT
concept may have had some kind of conceptual integrity at one point. But
that has since been lost under an ongoing wave of short-sighted management
decisions driven entirely by pursuit of immediate profits.
And today, Microsoft’s own experts have no clear idea what Windows is
doing any more. Why do you think it needs to reboot about five times just
to do an OS install?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/behemoth

behemoth noun

2: something of monstrous size, power, or appearance
[as in] a behemoth truck

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That's what Windows is. Even Win10 is bloated *as fuck*. It just
melds well with hardware above a certain standard. And Win11 is only
more bloated. Linux is salvation, for one who treasures the PC.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
Physfitfreak
2025-02-02 03:53:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Many years ago, a software engineer named Fred Brooks predicted that
some systems could get so complex that they would exceed a manageable
threshold of complexity, where every attempt to fix a bug would just
create new ones.
Microsoft passed this point a long time ago. Read this
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-11-24h2s-wild-ride-some-fixes-are-in-but-other-bugs-still-linger/>
and think: how many times have you heard of this sort of thing, just
When Microsoft rolled out another Windows 11 24H2 update for
January's Patch Tuesday, instead of fixing existing issues, the
update created more havoc, causing conflicts with audio,
Bluetooth, webcams, and more. But a preview update released on
Jan. 28 finally fixed several glitches -- both old and new.
But before you dive into the 2024 update, know that you may run
into some problems and conflicts. The new version has been plagued
by bugs that could prevent you from using Windows reliably and
effectively.
The number of bugs in Windows 11 24H2 also seems greater than in
past annual Windows updates. The ongoing spread of one bug after
another and Microsoft's need to stall the update for many people
both point to a problem with this latest version.
Not the first time Windows has had this sort of trouble! It has become
a regular occurrence the past few years.
The reason is Microsoft hired people who didn't fire "DFS" type employees.

United States has been suffering from that problem since Reagan era.
DFS
2025-02-03 02:23:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Many years ago, a software engineer named Fred Brooks predicted that
some systems could get so complex that they would exceed a manageable
threshold of complexity, where every attempt to fix a bug would just
create new ones.
Microsoft passed this point a long time ago. Read this
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-11-24h2s-wild-ride-some-fixes-are-in-but-other-bugs-still-linger/>
and think: how many times have you heard of this sort of thing, just
When Microsoft rolled out another Windows 11 24H2 update for
January's Patch Tuesday, instead of fixing existing issues, the
update created more havoc, causing conflicts with audio,
Bluetooth, webcams, and more. But a preview update released on
Jan. 28 finally fixed several glitches -- both old and new.
But before you dive into the 2024 update, know that you may run
into some problems and conflicts. The new version has been plagued
by bugs that could prevent you from using Windows reliably and
effectively.
The number of bugs in Windows 11 24H2 also seems greater than in
past annual Windows updates. The ongoing spread of one bug after
another and Microsoft's need to stall the update for many people
both point to a problem with this latest version.
Conclusion: OS's are extremely complicated pieces of code that will
never be "perfect".
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Not the first time Windows has had this sort of trouble! It has become
a regular occurrence the past few years.
The large GuhNoo part of your lamebrain seems to have completely
forgotten the Linux kernel alone has suffered many thousands of
regressions through the years.

"It’s a regression if something running fine with one Linux kernel works
worse or not at all with a newer version."

There's so many that academics at major institutions write papers about
them:

https://static.lwn.net/images/pdf/kernel_regressions.pdf (see Table 1)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02091

https://mirror.linux.org.au/pub/linux.conf.au/2004/papers/41-janis-johnson-reghunt_kernel.pdf

https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3634737.3637642



It's clear you're being true to yourself and have decided to identify as
a lying Linux idiot.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2025-02-07 21:36:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by DFS
There's so many that academics at major institutions write papers about
You do realize those bugs get fixed as result of those reports, don’t you?
And usually pretty promptly, too. Indeed, such research often points to
new tools and methodologies for improving the reliability of the software
being developed in the first place.

In other words, they are contributing to the greater reliability and
versatility of the Linux kernel and other open-source software, and to the
increasing disparity between that and the flaky, fragile, unwieldy house
of cards that is Microsoft Windows.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2025-02-07 21:41:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Many years ago, a software engineer named Fred Brooks predicted that
some systems could get so complex that they would exceed a manageable
threshold of complexity, where every attempt to fix a bug would just
create new ones.
Microsoft passed this point a long time ago.
The sorry Dimdows 11 saga continues
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-11s-bug-fixing-update-is-making-things-worse/>.
This latest update is actually *adding* more net bugs on top of the
previous revision of the OS.

Have we gone beyond the Brooks threshold, and now entered a Kessler
Syndrome of runaway bug proliferation, where instead of merely
creating about one new bug for every one fixed, the “fixes” are
actually adding to an exponential decline in Microsoft’s software
quality?
Joel
2025-02-08 00:14:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Many years ago, a software engineer named Fred Brooks predicted that
some systems could get so complex that they would exceed a manageable
threshold of complexity, where every attempt to fix a bug would just
create new ones.
Microsoft passed this point a long time ago.
The sorry Dimdows 11 saga continues
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-11s-bug-fixing-update-is-making-things-worse/>.
This latest update is actually *adding* more net bugs on top of the
previous revision of the OS.
Have we gone beyond the Brooks threshold, and now entered a Kessler
Syndrome of runaway bug proliferation, where instead of merely
creating about one new bug for every one fixed, the “fixes” are
actually adding to an exponential decline in Microsoft’s software
quality?
This is nothing new, public beta testing, just run 23H2 or better yet,
upgrade to Linux.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
Paul
2025-02-08 01:26:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Joel
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Many years ago, a software engineer named Fred Brooks predicted that
some systems could get so complex that they would exceed a manageable
threshold of complexity, where every attempt to fix a bug would just
create new ones.
Microsoft passed this point a long time ago.
The sorry Dimdows 11 saga continues
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-11s-bug-fixing-update-is-making-things-worse/>.
This latest update is actually *adding* more net bugs on top of the
previous revision of the OS.
Have we gone beyond the Brooks threshold, and now entered a Kessler
Syndrome of runaway bug proliferation, where instead of merely
creating about one new bug for every one fixed, the “fixes” are
actually adding to an exponential decline in Microsoft’s software
quality?
This is nothing new, public beta testing, just run 23H2 or better yet,
upgrade to Linux.
"The latest issue centers around the Windows 11 24H2 preview update"
^^^^^^^

Yeah, we don't install those. Those are voluntary, in that you click
that if you think there is something in that update for you.

It will appear again on Patch Tuesday, which would be the 11th of February.

A valuable place to gather intelligence, is the Reliability Monitor,
which keeps certain kinds of failures in a chart form. Nobody seems to
have bothered in that article, to check for messages in there.

That's an alternative to looking in EventVwr.msc .

TO get there, open Settings and type "Relia" into the top search bar.

Paul
Joel
2025-02-08 01:50:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Paul
[Windows 11 24H2 is in] public beta testing, just run 23H2 or better yet,
upgrade to Linux.
"The latest issue centers around the Windows 11 24H2 preview update"
^^^^^^^
Yeah, we don't install those. Those are voluntary, in that you click
that if you think there is something in that update for you.
It will appear again on Patch Tuesday, which would be the 11th of February.
A valuable place to gather intelligence, is the Reliability Monitor,
which keeps certain kinds of failures in a chart form. Nobody seems to
have bothered in that article, to check for messages in there.
That's an alternative to looking in EventVwr.msc .
TO get there, open Settings and type "Relia" into the top search bar.
The preview update isn't the only bug I've heard about in Win12 I mean
11 24H2. Honestly, having an actual good PC, that I assembled from
quality parts, I never encountered bugs with Win11 updates. That
having been said, it seems worse since I deleted Win11 23H2 early in
that build's life. Maybe if I'm not running Winblows, M$ expects
everyone else to be smart enough to follow the leader, well, I try, I
post here on COLA, I make Linux look cool, I talk to Copilot in a Web
app, but I can't just wave my hand and make people wake up to how
shitty Winblows is, and replace it. So the stats remain with Windows
being heavily dominant.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
Paul
2025-02-08 02:57:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Joel
Post by Paul
[Windows 11 24H2 is in] public beta testing, just run 23H2 or better yet,
upgrade to Linux.
"The latest issue centers around the Windows 11 24H2 preview update"
^^^^^^^
Yeah, we don't install those. Those are voluntary, in that you click
that if you think there is something in that update for you.
It will appear again on Patch Tuesday, which would be the 11th of February.
A valuable place to gather intelligence, is the Reliability Monitor,
which keeps certain kinds of failures in a chart form. Nobody seems to
have bothered in that article, to check for messages in there.
That's an alternative to looking in EventVwr.msc .
TO get there, open Settings and type "Relia" into the top search bar.
The preview update isn't the only bug I've heard about in Win12 I mean
11 24H2. Honestly, having an actual good PC, that I assembled from
quality parts, I never encountered bugs with Win11 updates. That
having been said, it seems worse since I deleted Win11 23H2 early in
that build's life. Maybe if I'm not running Winblows, M$ expects
everyone else to be smart enough to follow the leader, well, I try, I
post here on COLA, I make Linux look cool, I talk to Copilot in a Web
app, but I can't just wave my hand and make people wake up to how
shitty Winblows is, and replace it. So the stats remain with Windows
being heavily dominant.
The root cause of some of this, is the pattern I've spotted
where Microsoft is trying to take over all the proprietary
drivers. This is likely why USB DACs got broken. They didn't
get broken because the manufacturer sent an update. And the usual
USB parts of a PC, would have nothing to do with USB DAC health,
that would also not be affecting the operation of USB sticks
or USB disk enclosures and so on.

The USB DACs likely got affected, by some attempt to create a
class driver for the DACs, and failing at it.

But the rest of the symptoms, I don't see a locus there, to predict
where those problems are coming from. Usually the File Explorer
is relatively immune to the churn around it. And if you fouled up
a disk driver... the system isn't going to be able to boot. And the
class drivers for that, haven't been updated in years. It's because
of the simplicity of making read/write work on a disk.

Paul
Frank Slootweg
2025-02-08 15:22:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
[...]
Post by Paul
Post by Joel
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
The sorry Dimdows 11 saga continues
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-11s-bug-fixing-update-is-making-things-worse/>.
This latest update is actually *adding* more net bugs on top of the
previous revision of the OS.
Have we gone beyond the Brooks threshold, and now entered a Kessler
Syndrome of runaway bug proliferation, where instead of merely
creating about one new bug for every one fixed, the ?fixes? are
actually adding to an exponential decline in Microsoft?s software
quality?
This is nothing new, public beta testing, just run 23H2 or better yet,
upgrade to Linux.
"The latest issue centers around the Windows 11 24H2 preview update"
Yeah, we don't install those. Those are voluntary, in that you click
that if you think there is something in that update for you.
It will appear again on Patch Tuesday, which would be the 11th of February.
Please don't spoil Lawrence's rants with facts and common sense!

I've yet to see a Windows critcism from him which is *not* bogus.

Strange that he apparently feels so insecure about Linux, that he
'needs' to attack Windows for no good reason.

We Windows users don't feel the need to do the opposite, mainly
because, as they say, "Windows isn't a religion.".

Why he just can't be happy with what he has, is beyond me.
Post by Paul
A valuable place to gather intelligence, is the Reliability Monitor,
which keeps certain kinds of failures in a chart form. Nobody seems to
have bothered in that article, to check for messages in there.
That's an alternative to looking in EventVwr.msc .
TO get there, open Settings and type "Relia" into the top search bar.
There you go again, being sensible! What's wrong with some nice FUD,
urban legends, innuendo, fear mongering, etc.!?

But excuse me, I've got to rush. Got to install a Windows system and
as Lawrence says that "needs to reboot about five times", I need to get
cracking.

N.B. This post is brought to you by courtesy of vim, GNU and Cygwin.
Joel
2025-02-08 16:24:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Frank Slootweg
[...]
Post by Paul
Post by Joel
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
The sorry Dimdows 11 saga continues
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-11s-bug-fixing-update-is-making-things-worse/>.
This latest update is actually *adding* more net bugs on top of the
previous revision of the OS.
Have we gone beyond the Brooks threshold, and now entered a Kessler
Syndrome of runaway bug proliferation, where instead of merely
creating about one new bug for every one fixed, the ?fixes? are
actually adding to an exponential decline in Microsoft?s software
quality?
This is nothing new, public beta testing, just run 23H2 or better yet,
upgrade to Linux.
"The latest issue centers around the Windows 11 24H2 preview update"
Yeah, we don't install those. Those are voluntary, in that you click
that if you think there is something in that update for you.
It will appear again on Patch Tuesday, which would be the 11th of February.
Please don't spoil Lawrence's rants with facts and common sense!
I've yet to see a Windows critcism from him which is *not* bogus.
Strange that he apparently feels so insecure about Linux, that he
'needs' to attack Windows for no good reason.
We Windows users don't feel the need to do the opposite, mainly
because, as they say, "Windows isn't a religion.".
Why he just can't be happy with what he has, is beyond me.
Post by Paul
A valuable place to gather intelligence, is the Reliability Monitor,
which keeps certain kinds of failures in a chart form. Nobody seems to
have bothered in that article, to check for messages in there.
That's an alternative to looking in EventVwr.msc .
TO get there, open Settings and type "Relia" into the top search bar.
There you go again, being sensible! What's wrong with some nice FUD,
urban legends, innuendo, fear mongering, etc.!?
But excuse me, I've got to rush. Got to install a Windows system and
as Lawrence says that "needs to reboot about five times", I need to get
cracking.
N.B. This post is brought to you by courtesy of vim, GNU and Cygwin.
It's just too funny, I'm running Forte Agent under Wine, you're
running vim under Cygwin. Couldn't be more equal and opposite.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
Frank Slootweg
2025-02-08 18:36:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
[...]
Post by Joel
Post by Frank Slootweg
N.B. This post is brought to you by courtesy of vim, GNU and Cygwin.
It's just too funny, I'm running Forte Agent under Wine, you're
running vim under Cygwin. Couldn't be more equal and opposite.
Yes, vim and tin, a newsreader of Unix origin.

But that only shows that you can run good software on a 'bad' OS. And
that goes for us *both*! :-)
Joel
2025-02-08 18:49:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Frank Slootweg
Post by Joel
Post by Frank Slootweg
N.B. This post is brought to you by courtesy of vim, GNU and Cygwin.
It's just too funny, I'm running Forte Agent under Wine, you're
running vim under Cygwin. Couldn't be more equal and opposite.
Yes, vim and tin, a newsreader of Unix origin.
But that only shows that you can run good software on a 'bad' OS. And
that goes for us *both*! :-)
I like that it demonstrates interoperability - you seem to prefer a
console interface, whereas I am largely desiring a GUI (but not
limited to it, of course).
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
Physfitfreak
2025-02-08 19:48:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Frank Slootweg
[...]
Post by Joel
Post by Frank Slootweg
N.B. This post is brought to you by courtesy of vim, GNU and Cygwin.
It's just too funny, I'm running Forte Agent under Wine, you're
running vim under Cygwin. Couldn't be more equal and opposite.
Yes, vim and tin, a newsreader of Unix origin.
But that only shows that you can run good software on a 'bad' OS. And
that goes for us *both*! :-)
Huh.. Living the American life itself has been good software on a crappy
OS for decades.
rbowman
2025-02-08 19:43:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
It's just too funny, I'm running Forte Agent under Wine, you're running
vim under Cygwin. Couldn't be more equal and opposite.
Cygwin isn't necessary for gVim under Windows.
Frank Slootweg
2025-02-08 20:41:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by rbowman
It's just too funny, I'm running Forte Agent under Wine, you're running
vim under Cygwin. Couldn't be more equal and opposite.
Cygwin isn't necessary for gVim under Windows.
Indeed it isn't, but - as I later mentioned - I use tin as my
newsreader and I mentioned 'GNU', meaning all the GNU tools/commands/
etc.. Granted, most of the latter can also be gotten as 'native' Windows
executables, but probably not with a 'package manager' such as Cygwin
has.

If I was starting now/recently, I would probably use WSL (Windows
Subsystem for Linux), but I already used similar stuff in the 80s, so
Cygwin was the logical choice for Windows.
Paul
2025-02-08 21:12:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Frank Slootweg
Post by rbowman
It's just too funny, I'm running Forte Agent under Wine, you're running
vim under Cygwin. Couldn't be more equal and opposite.
Cygwin isn't necessary for gVim under Windows.
Indeed it isn't, but - as I later mentioned - I use tin as my
newsreader and I mentioned 'GNU', meaning all the GNU tools/commands/
etc.. Granted, most of the latter can also be gotten as 'native' Windows
executables, but probably not with a 'package manager' such as Cygwin
has.
If I was starting now/recently, I would probably use WSL (Windows
Subsystem for Linux), but I already used similar stuff in the 80s, so
Cygwin was the logical choice for Windows.
And you don't have to keep an entire Cygwin installation
to make a Cygwin .exe item to work. As long as you
copy the DLLs it needs into a folder, it runs fine
in the portable sense. I run "disktype" in its own
folder, and the Cygwin tree is long gone.

Paul
rbowman
2025-02-09 00:35:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Frank Slootweg
Indeed it isn't, but - as I later mentioned - I use tin as my
newsreader and I mentioned 'GNU', meaning all the GNU tools/commands/
etc.. Granted, most of the latter can also be gotten as 'native' Windows
executables, but probably not with a 'package manager' such as Cygwin
has.
That's one of my first steps when provisioning a new Windows machine --
adding the native Windows tools. I can only take so much of 'ls' failing
and I never bothered to learn to use 'dir' effectively.
Post by Frank Slootweg
If I was starting now/recently, I would probably use WSL (Windows
Subsystem for Linux), but I already used similar stuff in the 80s, so
Cygwin was the logical choice for Windows.
I have installed Cygwin in the past but at work we used the MKS Nutcracker
tools and runtime. They didn't play together all that well. Using Cygwin
for a commercial suite of apps was out.

I started using DJGPP on DOS. My 'hello world' was porting
MidnightCommander back to Windows, which is ironic considering it started
as a port of a Windows app. I did a little work on what is now MinGW. That
was started by Anders Norlander and carried on by Mumit Khan. I don't know
who is developing it these days. The philosophy was different, using GNU
tools to build native Windows apps. Corinna Vinschen at that time took the
Cygwin route trying to bring POSIX to Windows.

WSL is handy. We had a map product that required a base map. Usually no
problem but at trade shows a decent internet connection is expensive and
often sucks. It's fairly easy to create a map tile server using OSM data
on Linux but a real mess on Windows. Solution: run the tile server on a
WSL Debian instance on the marketing laptops, with the Windows
applications on the same machine. I originally thought about running the
tile server on a mini but that approach led to one less piece of equipment
to get lost.

Most of my Windows machines are set up for WSL but between here and work
I've got five dedicated Linux boxes, if you count the Debian derived
Raspberry Pi OS so I use those. Almost everything I use is cross platform
anyway so the Linux and Windows boxes are provisioned very similarly.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2025-02-08 23:54:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Paul
"The latest issue centers around the Windows 11 24H2 preview update"
^^^^^^^
Yeah, we don't install those.
Why not? What is a “preview” supposed to be, really? In movies and TV,
they are selected snippets of the forthcoming feature, to tease you into
looking forward to the full thing. But as far as Microsoft is concerned,
this *is* the feature.

If it’s a public beta test, why don’t they say so? Why can’t they be
honest and admit that they are using their docile and unsuspecting user
base as unpaid guinea-pigs for buggy software that will likely cause
problems for its users? Nay, not just unpaid, but actually paying for the
privilege?

Unless, of course, “preview” actually means “foretaste of the even worse
hell to come” ...
rbowman
2025-02-09 00:40:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
If it’s a public beta test, why don’t they say so? Why can’t they be
honest and admit that they are using their docile and unsuspecting user
base as unpaid guinea-pigs for buggy software that will likely cause
problems for its users? Nay, not just unpaid, but actually paying for
the privilege?
I don't think the user base is that docile and unsuspecting. In addition
to the previews there are the developer and canary channels for the
Windows Insider program for the braver sorts. No different than running
Debian Sid.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2025-02-18 21:51:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Many years ago, a software engineer named Fred Brooks predicted that
some systems could get so complex that they would exceed a manageable
threshold of complexity, where every attempt to fix a bug would just
create new ones.
Microsoft passed this point a long time ago.
The sorry Dimdows 11 saga continues
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-11s-bug-fixing-update-is-making-things-worse/>.
This latest update is actually *adding* more net bugs on top of the
previous revision of the OS.
Have we gone beyond the Brooks threshold, and now entered a Kessler
Syndrome of runaway bug proliferation, where instead of merely creating
about one new bug for every one fixed, the “fixes” are actually adding
to an exponential decline in Microsoft’s software quality?
You thought it was a fluke? The troubles continue
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-11-update-breaks-file-explorer-among-other-glitches/>.
Now Microsoft is breaking basic things like File Explorer!

You know how Microsoft is ending free support for Windows 10, and is
pushing everybody to Windows 11? It’s looking more and more like this
will be a step *down* in software quality, not just now but into the
future:

Each annual Windows update can suffer from bugs, especially after
being rolled out to millions of users. However, Windows 11 24H2
has been more problematic than usual. Since its official launch
last October, the 2024 version has carried with it a host of known
issues, many of which still haven't been resolved. As we get
closer to the October 2025 deadline for the Windows 10 support
cutoff, Microsoft needs to ensure that Windows 11 is a more stable
and reliable system.
Joel
2025-02-18 22:11:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Many years ago, a software engineer named Fred Brooks predicted that
some systems could get so complex that they would exceed a manageable
threshold of complexity, where every attempt to fix a bug would just
create new ones.
Microsoft passed this point a long time ago.
The sorry Dimdows 11 saga continues
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-11s-bug-fixing-update-is-making-things-worse/>.
This latest update is actually *adding* more net bugs on top of the
previous revision of the OS.
Have we gone beyond the Brooks threshold, and now entered a Kessler
Syndrome of runaway bug proliferation, where instead of merely creating
about one new bug for every one fixed, the “fixes” are actually adding
to an exponential decline in Microsoft’s software quality?
You thought it was a fluke? The troubles continue
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-11-update-breaks-file-explorer-among-other-glitches/>.
Now Microsoft is breaking basic things like File Explorer!
You know how Microsoft is ending free support for Windows 10, and is
pushing everybody to Windows 11? It’s looking more and more like this
will be a step *down* in software quality, not just now but into the
Each annual Windows update can suffer from bugs, especially after
being rolled out to millions of users. However, Windows 11 24H2
has been more problematic than usual. Since its official launch
last October, the 2024 version has carried with it a host of known
issues, many of which still haven't been resolved. As we get
closer to the October 2025 deadline for the Windows 10 support
cutoff, Microsoft needs to ensure that Windows 11 is a more stable
and reliable system.
If people haven't figured out to switch to Linux, by now, I dunno if
there's any hope for the human race, tech-wise. M$ is flat-out
telling you not to use their crapware, not to say Linux is *perfect*
either, but I'm damn sure happier with it, by a country mile. It
takes some doing, some learning, some tinkering, but you end up with a
fabulous, robust system, maybe not having M$ Office and Adobe
Photoshop, but not having useless Win11 either - and that's good
enough for me.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
rbowman
2025-02-19 01:06:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
You thought it was a fluke? The troubles continue
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-11-update-breaks-file-explorer-
among-other-glitches/>.
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Now Microsoft is breaking basic things like File Explorer!
I just checked and and the Windows laptop I did the Fedora test on
yesterday does have KB5051987, which I installed last Tuesday and the file
explorer still seems to be functional. I didn't do much with the Windows
side yesterday.

https://betanews.com/2025/02/15/test-fedora-microsoft-windows-subsystem-
linux-wsl/

That's an explanation of the test procedure.

Loading...