There Is Nothing Green About the 'Green' Agenda. THE TRUTH ABOUT GREEN ENERGY.

[John Smyth]

'There Is Nothing Green About the ‘Green’ Agenda''

<https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/02/there-is-nothing-green-about-green-agenda/>

'Now that the Democrats have lost their lock grip on power, what’s a
green activist to do? It’s almost comical how the climate left is trying
to cloak their agenda in terms they think will melt in Republicans’
ears. For example, Jennifer Granholm, energy secretary in the Biden
administration recently penned an opinion piece arguing that President
Trump is playing right into Communist China’s evil hands by killing off
America’s green economy.

Translation: The left is furious that Trump has halted the flow of
billions of taxpayers’ dollars to subsidize electric vehicles that
nobody wants and only the well-off can afford. The new president is
killing the “green economy,” as Granholm puts it.

There is nothing green about the climate left’s solutions.

If the climate movement was truly sincere and intellectually honest in
its desire to stop actions contributing to global environmental
degradation, it would stand fast against solar panels and electric
vehicles. There is nothing green about the climate left’s solutions.

There is nothing environmentally friendly about using enslaved children
in the Congo to mine cobalt for lithium-ion rechargeable batteries used
in EVs. They labor with crude tools and bare hands, breathing in
cobalt’s toxic dust in cramped pits. Runoff infused with cobalt and
other chemicals contaminate the water supply. Meanwhile, on the other
side of the world, green activists sit blithely unaware or unconcerned
in the comfort of their own homes. They are saving the world, they
smugly assure themselves, while children suffer in an environmental
hellhole.

Far removed from U.S. environmental standards, Indonesia is the center
of mining and refining nickel, an essential component in EV batteries.
Pea soup-thick brown emissions shroud nickel smelting operations in the
Indonesian island of Sulawesi as well as the coal-fired plants that fuel
them. Processing waste and chemicals potentially leach into the ground.
Dust residue from both ubiquitously blanket nearby communities, while
waterways tainted by mining operations have red cast. Whatever else
climate activists may try to tell us, there is nothing green going on
here.

In Brazil, near the mouth of the Amazon River, a factory refines bauxite
into what eventually becomes aluminum. It had been the source of
aluminum in the Ford F-150 Lightening, the company’s now cancelled
all-electric pickup truck. A lawsuit alleges that toxic elements,
including aluminum and other heavy metals emanating from the refinery,
have been responsible for cancer, birth defects, neurological
dysfunction, digestive disorders, skin conditions, and increased
mortality. How can an EV be called green or good for the environment
when it’s making thousands of Brazilians sick?

Elsewhere in Brazil this past Christmas season, Brazilian authorities
shuttered construction of an EV factory when it was discovered that its
builders were working under “slavery”-like conditions. How is that a
green virtue? Perhaps green dogma holds that human worth and dignity are
small sacrifices that must be made for the common good.

Solar energy, long the prize pig of the climate crowd, isn’t green
either. The fact that destroying forest land for solar arrays is bad for
the environment should be obvious. Studies have found “the loss of
carbon-dioxide gobbling forests for solar installations results in a net
increase in greenhouse gas emissions.” Nor should wind farms be
considered remotely green when wildlife is being killed and habitats are
being disrupted. The same is true offshore, with a number of whale
deaths associated with mammoth wind operations.

The same folks pushing “green” have been disingenuous from the start. In
1970, they assured us that human activity would cause an ice age by the
21st century and that we’d be under food rationing by 1980. Acid rain
was a crisis until it wasn’t. Then global warming became the crisis,
with much of New York City to be underwater by 2019. In 2008, Al Gore
prophesized that the North polar cap would be gone in five years. It
wasn’t. In 2009, UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown proclaimed,” We have
fewer than 50 days to save our planet from catastrophe. Spoiler alert:
We’re still here and thriving.

Their seemingly endless lies have been accompanied by Orwellian word
games, moving from “global warming” to “change.” Now the Newspeak has
shifted to “extreme weather and “overheating.

The truth is there is no green energy. No energy is clean. No energy is
dirty. There are only challenges, solutions and tradeoffs. At the time
of already high energy costs, choosing reliable, fossil fuel-backed
energy is of paramount importance. Word sophistry from our friends on
the left won’t change that'

[pothead]

Post by John Smyth
'There Is Nothing Green About the ‘Green’ Agenda''
<https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/02/there-is-nothing-green-about-green-agenda/>
'Now that the Democrats have lost their lock grip on power, what’s a
green activist to do? It’s almost comical how the climate left is trying
to cloak their agenda in terms they think will melt in Republicans’
ears. For example, Jennifer Granholm, energy secretary in the Biden
administration recently penned an opinion piece arguing that President
Trump is playing right into Communist China’s evil hands by killing off
America’s green economy.
Translation: The left is furious that Trump has halted the flow of
billions of taxpayers’ dollars to subsidize electric vehicles that
nobody wants and only the well-off can afford. The new president is
killing the “green economy,” as Granholm puts it.
There is nothing green about the climate left’s solutions.
If the climate movement was truly sincere and intellectually honest in
its desire to stop actions contributing to global environmental
degradation, it would stand fast against solar panels and electric
vehicles. There is nothing green about the climate left’s solutions.
There is nothing environmentally friendly about using enslaved children
in the Congo to mine cobalt for lithium-ion rechargeable batteries used
in EVs. They labor with crude tools and bare hands, breathing in
cobalt’s toxic dust in cramped pits. Runoff infused with cobalt and
other chemicals contaminate the water supply. Meanwhile, on the other
side of the world, green activists sit blithely unaware or unconcerned
in the comfort of their own homes. They are saving the world, they
smugly assure themselves, while children suffer in an environmental
hellhole.
Far removed from U.S. environmental standards, Indonesia is the center
of mining and refining nickel, an essential component in EV batteries.
Pea soup-thick brown emissions shroud nickel smelting operations in the
Indonesian island of Sulawesi as well as the coal-fired plants that fuel
them. Processing waste and chemicals potentially leach into the ground.
Dust residue from both ubiquitously blanket nearby communities, while
waterways tainted by mining operations have red cast. Whatever else
climate activists may try to tell us, there is nothing green going on
here.
In Brazil, near the mouth of the Amazon River, a factory refines bauxite
into what eventually becomes aluminum. It had been the source of
aluminum in the Ford F-150 Lightening, the company’s now cancelled
all-electric pickup truck. A lawsuit alleges that toxic elements,
including aluminum and other heavy metals emanating from the refinery,
have been responsible for cancer, birth defects, neurological
dysfunction, digestive disorders, skin conditions, and increased
mortality. How can an EV be called green or good for the environment
when it’s making thousands of Brazilians sick?
Elsewhere in Brazil this past Christmas season, Brazilian authorities
shuttered construction of an EV factory when it was discovered that its
builders were working under “slavery”-like conditions. How is that a
green virtue? Perhaps green dogma holds that human worth and dignity are
small sacrifices that must be made for the common good.
Solar energy, long the prize pig of the climate crowd, isn’t green
either. The fact that destroying forest land for solar arrays is bad for
the environment should be obvious. Studies have found “the loss of
carbon-dioxide gobbling forests for solar installations results in a net
increase in greenhouse gas emissions.” Nor should wind farms be
considered remotely green when wildlife is being killed and habitats are
being disrupted. The same is true offshore, with a number of whale
deaths associated with mammoth wind operations.
The same folks pushing “green” have been disingenuous from the start. In
1970, they assured us that human activity would cause an ice age by the
21st century and that we’d be under food rationing by 1980. Acid rain
was a crisis until it wasn’t. Then global warming became the crisis,
with much of New York City to be underwater by 2019. In 2008, Al Gore
prophesized that the North polar cap would be gone in five years. It
wasn’t. In 2009, UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown proclaimed,” We have
We’re still here and thriving.
Their seemingly endless lies have been accompanied by Orwellian word
games, moving from “global warming” to “change.” Now the Newspeak has
shifted to “extreme weather and “overheating.
The truth is there is no green energy. No energy is clean. No energy is
dirty. There are only challenges, solutions and tradeoffs. At the time
of already high energy costs, choosing reliable, fossil fuel-backed
energy is of paramount importance. Word sophistry from our friends on
the left won’t change that'

Good poast.
These are just some of the dirty little secrets that the greeniacs refuse to discuss.