Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech

[CrudeSausage]

<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech>

Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
is sad.

[MummyChunk]

Post by CrudeSausage
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech
Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
is sad.
--
CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

Care to share why you have your opinion?


This is a response to the post seen at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

[RonB]

Post by MummyChunk

Post by CrudeSausage
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech
Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
is sad.
--
CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

Care to share why you have your opinion?
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

I typed in "Micheal Jackson" about four times in the "checker box" and it
wouldn't let me in, so I won't be trying to follow this link either. What a
stupid verification system.

Perhaps you could quote the pertinent parts?

[MummyChunk]

Post by RonB

Post by CrudeSausage
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech
Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
is sad.
--
CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative
Care to share why you have your opinion?
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

I typed in "Micheal Jackson" about four times in the "checker

box" and it

Post by RonB
wouldn't let me in, so I won't be trying to follow this link either. What a
stupid verification system.
Perhaps you could quote the pertinent parts?
--
"Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good." J.R.R. Tolkien

Check your spelling


This is a response to the post seen at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

[Joel]

Post by RonB

Post by RonB

Post by MummyChunk
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

I typed in "Micheal Jackson" about four times in the "checker

box" and it

Post by RonB
wouldn't let me in, so I won't be trying to follow this link either. What a
stupid verification system.
Perhaps you could quote the pertinent parts?

Check your spelling

I spelled it right and it didn't work for me, either.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[MummyChunk]

Post by Joel

Post by MummyChunk
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664
I typed in "Micheal Jackson" about four times in the

"checker

Post by Joel

Post by MummyChunk
box" and it
wouldn't let me in, so I won't be trying to follow this link either. What a
stupid verification system.
Perhaps you could quote the pertinent parts?
Check your spelling

I spelled it right and it didn't work for me, either.
--
Joel W. Crump
Amendment XIV
Section 1.
[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

If you look at what he posted, he didn't spell it correctly.


This is a response to the post seen at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

[RonB]

Post by RonB

Post by Joel

Post by MummyChunk
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664
I typed in "Micheal Jackson" about four times in the

"checker

Post by Joel

Post by MummyChunk
box" and it
wouldn't let me in, so I won't be trying to follow this link either. What a
stupid verification system.
Perhaps you could quote the pertinent parts?
Check your spelling

I spelled it right and it didn't work for me, either.
--
Joel W. Crump
Amendment XIV
Section 1.
[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

If you look at what he posted, he didn't spell it correctly.
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

Okay, I tried it again. It keeps looping back to...

Input Verification Required!

Maybe it doesn't like uBlock Origin? If that's the case, oh well.

[RonB]

Post by RonB

Post by RonB

Post by CrudeSausage
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech
Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
is sad.
--
CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative
Care to share why you have your opinion?
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

I typed in "Micheal Jackson" about four times in the "checker

box" and it

Post by RonB
wouldn't let me in, so I won't be trying to follow this link either. What a
stupid verification system.
Perhaps you could quote the pertinent parts?
--
"Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good." J.R.R. Tolkien

Check your spelling
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

No thanks, I already tried "Michael Jackson" (which is what I actually
used). The spelling error was in my post. If they want people to read their
forum they shouldn't put up these kinds of barriers. I don't want to waste
my time with this kind of thing.

[CrudeSausage]

Post by MummyChunk

Post by CrudeSausage
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech
Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
is sad.
--
CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

Care to share why you have your opinion?
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

Well, GNOME and Mozilla are emphasizing on DIE practices rather than
improving their product to a point that both are now looking like
they're going to go bankrupt. Redhat and IBM have also both expressed a
desire to prioritize employment for anyone who isn't white and
heterosexual. Debian has moved in that direction as well and now the
people behind Arch are stating that right-wing ideas are unwelcome among
them. Elementary OS had already been pretty clear about their hatred of
conservatives for years. It seems that meritocracies are of no interest
in the development of Linux. Since that is becoming the case, I'll just
use whatever works best.

[RonB]

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by MummyChunk

Post by CrudeSausage
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech
Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
is sad.
--
CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

Care to share why you have your opinion?
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

Well, GNOME and Mozilla are emphasizing on DIE practices rather than
improving their product to a point that both are now looking like
they're going to go bankrupt. Redhat and IBM have also both expressed a
desire to prioritize employment for anyone who isn't white and
heterosexual. Debian has moved in that direction as well and now the
people behind Arch are stating that right-wing ideas are unwelcome among
them. Elementary OS had already been pretty clear about their hatred of
conservatives for years. It seems that meritocracies are of no interest
in the development of Linux. Since that is becoming the case, I'll just
use whatever works best.

You keep saying that, but Gnome is an Open Source Project (and so is
Firefox) so they're not going to go "bankrupt." As for "improving their
product" the fact that I can still use a real version of uBlock Origin on
Firefox makes it superior to Chrome and its derivatives now that they've
moved to Manifest 3 and a more "controlled" environment.

You've got to quit reading "lunduke" if you're searching for objectivity —
he obviously has an anti-Linux ax to grind.

[CrudeSausage]

Post by RonB

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by MummyChunk

Post by CrudeSausage
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech
Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
is sad.
--
CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

Care to share why you have your opinion?
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

Well, GNOME and Mozilla are emphasizing on DIE practices rather than
improving their product to a point that both are now looking like
they're going to go bankrupt. Redhat and IBM have also both expressed a
desire to prioritize employment for anyone who isn't white and
heterosexual. Debian has moved in that direction as well and now the
people behind Arch are stating that right-wing ideas are unwelcome among
them. Elementary OS had already been pretty clear about their hatred of
conservatives for years. It seems that meritocracies are of no interest
in the development of Linux. Since that is becoming the case, I'll just
use whatever works best.

You keep saying that, but Gnome is an Open Source Project (and so is
Firefox) so they're not going to go "bankrupt." As for "improving their
product" the fact that I can still use a real version of uBlock Origin on
Firefox makes it superior to Chrome and its derivatives now that they've
moved to Manifest 3 and a more "controlled" environment.
You've got to quit reading "lunduke" if you're searching for objectivity —
he obviously has an anti-Linux ax to grind.

Actually, he's very much an advocate for Linux. Heck, he was on the
openSUSE board of directors for a while and even worked on the LibreM
from Purism. The guys is definitely not open-source, just anti-woke in
open-source.

[RonB]

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by RonB

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by MummyChunk

Post by CrudeSausage
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech
Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
is sad.
--
CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

Care to share why you have your opinion?
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

Well, GNOME and Mozilla are emphasizing on DIE practices rather than
improving their product to a point that both are now looking like
they're going to go bankrupt. Redhat and IBM have also both expressed a
desire to prioritize employment for anyone who isn't white and
heterosexual. Debian has moved in that direction as well and now the
people behind Arch are stating that right-wing ideas are unwelcome among
them. Elementary OS had already been pretty clear about their hatred of
conservatives for years. It seems that meritocracies are of no interest
in the development of Linux. Since that is becoming the case, I'll just
use whatever works best.

You keep saying that, but Gnome is an Open Source Project (and so is
Firefox) so they're not going to go "bankrupt." As for "improving their
product" the fact that I can still use a real version of uBlock Origin on
Firefox makes it superior to Chrome and its derivatives now that they've
moved to Manifest 3 and a more "controlled" environment.
You've got to quit reading "lunduke" if you're searching for objectivity —
he obviously has an anti-Linux ax to grind.

Actually, he's very much an advocate for Linux. Heck, he was on the
openSUSE board of directors for a while and even worked on the LibreM
from Purism. The guys is definitely not open-source, just anti-woke in
open-source.

Okay, but he seems to be in love with "the Linux sky is falling" whenever
there's any kind of issue with Linux. Like that CUPS issue that was so
"dangerous" — which turned out to be a huge yawn. And he played it out for
weeks. Maybe he's just using this kind of stuff as click bait. It's not
drawing me in.

[pothead]

Post by RonB

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by MummyChunk

Post by CrudeSausage
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech
Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
is sad.
--
CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

Care to share why you have your opinion?
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

Well, GNOME and Mozilla are emphasizing on DIE practices rather than
improving their product to a point that both are now looking like
they're going to go bankrupt. Redhat and IBM have also both expressed a
desire to prioritize employment for anyone who isn't white and
heterosexual. Debian has moved in that direction as well and now the
people behind Arch are stating that right-wing ideas are unwelcome among
them. Elementary OS had already been pretty clear about their hatred of
conservatives for years. It seems that meritocracies are of no interest
in the development of Linux. Since that is becoming the case, I'll just
use whatever works best.

You keep saying that, but Gnome is an Open Source Project (and so is
Firefox) so they're not going to go "bankrupt." As for "improving their
product" the fact that I can still use a real version of uBlock Origin on
Firefox makes it superior to Chrome and its derivatives now that they've
moved to Manifest 3 and a more "controlled" environment.
You've got to quit reading "lunduke" if you're searching for objectivity —
he obviously has an anti-Linux ax to grind.

I've never liked Lunduke. To me he was an opportunists playing both
sides of the debate between Linux and other operating systems.
As I have not watched him in a few years maybe things have changed but in the
past he seemed to focus on minor things that maybe most Linux users would
not encounter or if they did, easy work around would exist.
He is interesting but not my cup of whisky.
I'm a MX Linux user running kde.

[RonB]

Post by pothead

Post by RonB

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by MummyChunk

Post by CrudeSausage
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech
Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
is sad.
--
CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

Care to share why you have your opinion?
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

Well, GNOME and Mozilla are emphasizing on DIE practices rather than
improving their product to a point that both are now looking like
they're going to go bankrupt. Redhat and IBM have also both expressed a
desire to prioritize employment for anyone who isn't white and
heterosexual. Debian has moved in that direction as well and now the
people behind Arch are stating that right-wing ideas are unwelcome among
them. Elementary OS had already been pretty clear about their hatred of
conservatives for years. It seems that meritocracies are of no interest
in the development of Linux. Since that is becoming the case, I'll just
use whatever works best.

You keep saying that, but Gnome is an Open Source Project (and so is
Firefox) so they're not going to go "bankrupt." As for "improving their
product" the fact that I can still use a real version of uBlock Origin on
Firefox makes it superior to Chrome and its derivatives now that they've
moved to Manifest 3 and a more "controlled" environment.
You've got to quit reading "lunduke" if you're searching for objectivity —
he obviously has an anti-Linux ax to grind.

I've never liked Lunduke. To me he was an opportunists playing both
sides of the debate between Linux and other operating systems.
As I have not watched him in a few years maybe things have changed but in the
past he seemed to focus on minor things that maybe most Linux users would
not encounter or if they did, easy work around would exist.
He is interesting but not my cup of whisky.
I'm a MX Linux user running kde.

That's my impression. He seems to be self-promoting all the time, usually
with click bait.

[%]

Post by MummyChunk

Post by CrudeSausage
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech
Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
is sad.
--
CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

Care to share why you have your opinion?
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

once upon a time , there you go

[RonB]

Post by CrudeSausage
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech>
Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
is sad.

"Open Source" is not an entity. It can't be anti anything. I agree that
there are too many talking head, Woke drones heading too many open source
projects, but I'm guessing the majority of open source developers are
apolitical. There not the ones getting the headlines.

[CrudeSausage]

Post by RonB

Post by CrudeSausage
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech>
Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
is sad.

"Open Source" is not an entity. It can't be anti anything. I agree that
there are too many talking head, Woke drones heading too many open source
projects, but I'm guessing the majority of open source developers are
apolitical. There not the ones getting the headlines.

I'm sure that they're feeling more and more unwelcome with every passing
day. It would be alright if projects like Haiku were apolitical, but
even they have made it clear that they don't believe in a meritocracy.
Whites and heterosexuals have to be suppressed in favour of "the
minorities" whose populations across the planet are much larger than
that of the whites.

[RonB]

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by RonB

Post by CrudeSausage
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech>
Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
is sad.

"Open Source" is not an entity. It can't be anti anything. I agree that
there are too many talking head, Woke drones heading too many open source
projects, but I'm guessing the majority of open source developers are
apolitical. There not the ones getting the headlines.

I'm sure that they're feeling more and more unwelcome with every passing
day. It would be alright if projects like Haiku were apolitical, but
even they have made it clear that they don't believe in a meritocracy.
Whites and heterosexuals have to be suppressed in favour of "the
minorities" whose populations across the planet are much larger than
that of the whites.

Haiku is a tiny project with just a few people involved. Gnu/Linux is huge,
so trying to shoe-horn everyone into the Woke crap mindset that the more
outspoken push is a futile exercise.

[RonB]

Post by CrudeSausage
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech>
Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
is sad.

As "lunduke" I've had enough of his "the sky is falling" crap. I'm not going
to bother to follow your links.

[CrudeSausage]

Post by RonB

Post by CrudeSausage
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech>
Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
is sad.

As "lunduke" I've had enough of his "the sky is falling" crap. I'm not going
to bother to follow your links.

He makes Linux look bad, so he must be ignored or suppressed! Right?

[RonB]

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by RonB

Post by CrudeSausage
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech>
Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
is sad.

As "lunduke" I've had enough of his "the sky is falling" crap. I'm not going
to bother to follow your links.

He makes Linux look bad, so he must be ignored or suppressed! Right?

You can read the crank all you want, but not following his links where he
continuously whines about Linux is not "suppressing" him. Your going down
this path is to use the same emotional (and vacuous) "tactics" as the Woke
morons — where not reading their crap is "censorship." Not wasting my time
on anti-Linux bullshit is not "suppression." It's a choice I make to not
waste my time.