Discussion:
Judge Blocks Trump's Order Pulling Transgender Inmates from Women's Prisons
Add Reply
John Smyth
2025-02-05 22:18:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
'Judge Blocks Trump’s Order Pulling Transgender Inmates from Women’s
Prisons'

<https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/02/05/court-blocks-trumps-restoration-of-single-sex-jails/>

'A federal judge has blocked President Donald Trump’s transfer of three
self-declared “transgender” men back to all-male jails, from their
current cells in women’s jails.

The decision to impose a Temporary Restraining Order spotlights the role
of the U.S. Supreme Court in deciding whether the nation’s elected
leaders can establish single-sex jails and restore the law’s recognition
that men and women have distinct needs and desires based on biology.

Under President Joe Biden, progressive activists steered the government
to promote the claim that each person’s vague sense of gender is more
important than their biology.

The lawsuit was filed to stop Trump’s deputies from sending the three
men — dubbed “transgender women” — from their residence in women’s jails
back to men-only jails.

Their presence in the women’s prison is a threat to women and a burden
to jail operators, say opponents of transgenderism and Trump’s Executive
Order. which says:

Efforts to eradicate the biological reality of sex fundamentally attack
women by depriving them of their dignity, safety, and well-being. The
erasure of sex in language and policy has a corrosive impact not just on
women but on the validity of the entire American system.

But the jailed men “cited … various government reports and regulations
recognizing that transgender persons are at a significantly elevated
risk of physical and sexual violence relative to other inmates when
housed in a facility corresponding to their biological sex — which the
defendants do not dispute,” wrote Judge Royce Lamberth, of the U.S.
District Court for the District of Columbia.

The judge also blocked the transfer because Trump’s policy denies the
offer of cross-sex hormones to the men.

“The request for a temporary restraining order is GRANTED on the narrow
grounds of the plaintiffs’ Eighth Amendment claims” for constitutional
protections, the judge wrote.

The return of the male self-declared “transgender women” to men’s jails
does create problems for jail managers. However, similar dilemmas have
long been managed by management policies.

The Supreme Court has endorsed some transgender claims, but it is also
signaling that it does protect children from the transgender movement.

The government’s emphasis on biological sex is expected to help ordinary
Americans and their politicians balance the legally equal, competing,
and complementary civic preferences of men and women.

The case Doe v. McHenry, number 1:25-cv-286 in the United States
District Court, District of Columbia'
Siri Cruise
2025-02-05 22:32:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by John Smyth
“The request for a temporary restraining order is GRANTED on the narrow
grounds of the plaintiffs’ Eighth Amendment claims” for constitutional
protections, the judge wrote.
Poor idjt forced to obey the Constitution.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
pothead
2025-02-05 22:55:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by John Smyth
'Judge Blocks Trump’s Order Pulling Transgender Inmates from Women’s
Prisons'
<https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/02/05/court-blocks-trumps-restoration-of-single-sex-jails/>
'A federal judge has blocked President Donald Trump’s transfer of three
self-declared “transgender” men back to all-male jails, from their
current cells in women’s jails.
The decision to impose a Temporary Restraining Order spotlights the role
of the U.S. Supreme Court in deciding whether the nation’s elected
leaders can establish single-sex jails and restore the law’s recognition
that men and women have distinct needs and desires based on biology.
Under President Joe Biden, progressive activists steered the government
to promote the claim that each person’s vague sense of gender is more
important than their biology.
The lawsuit was filed to stop Trump’s deputies from sending the three
men — dubbed “transgender women” — from their residence in women’s jails
back to men-only jails.
Their presence in the women’s prison is a threat to women and a burden
to jail operators, say opponents of transgenderism and Trump’s Executive
Efforts to eradicate the biological reality of sex fundamentally attack
women by depriving them of their dignity, safety, and well-being. The
erasure of sex in language and policy has a corrosive impact not just on
women but on the validity of the entire American system.
But the jailed men “cited … various government reports and regulations
recognizing that transgender persons are at a significantly elevated
risk of physical and sexual violence relative to other inmates when
housed in a facility corresponding to their biological sex — which the
defendants do not dispute,” wrote Judge Royce Lamberth, of the U.S.
District Court for the District of Columbia.
The judge also blocked the transfer because Trump’s policy denies the
offer of cross-sex hormones to the men.
“The request for a temporary restraining order is GRANTED on the narrow
grounds of the plaintiffs’ Eighth Amendment claims” for constitutional
protections, the judge wrote.
The return of the male self-declared “transgender women” to men’s jails
does create problems for jail managers. However, similar dilemmas have
long been managed by management policies.
The Supreme Court has endorsed some transgender claims, but it is also
signaling that it does protect children from the transgender movement.
The government’s emphasis on biological sex is expected to help ordinary
Americans and their politicians balance the legally equal, competing,
and complementary civic preferences of men and women.
The case Doe v. McHenry, number 1:25-cv-286 in the United States
District Court, District of Columbia'
Here is what I would argue before the judge.

1. Your honor, please explain to me what a woman is.

2. Your honor, so it's acceptable for biological females to be forced to shower, share locker rooms
and so forth with biological males? So why is it not acceptable for biological males to share similar
with biological males dressed as females?

And that's just for starters.
--
pothead

Why did Joe Biden pardon his family?
Read below to learn the reason.
The Biden Crime Family Timeline here:
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/
Siri Cruise
2025-02-05 23:03:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
1. Your honor, please explain to me what a woman is.
2. Your honor, so it's acceptable for biological females to be forced to shower, share locker rooms
and so forth with biological males? So why is it not acceptable for biological males to share similar
with biological males dressed as females?
How is that relevant to the Eighth Amendment?
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
Joel
2025-02-05 23:32:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Your honor, so it's acceptable for biological females to be forced to shower, share locker rooms
and so forth with biological males? So why is it not acceptable for biological males to share similar
with biological males dressed as females?
If you had basic maturity, you'd be fine with trans women in women's
spaces. It's always stunted-growth, arrested-development bitches who
are the TERFs. They can fuck off.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
pothead
2025-02-05 23:54:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Joel
Post by pothead
Your honor, so it's acceptable for biological females to be forced to shower, share locker rooms
and so forth with biological males? So why is it not acceptable for biological males to share similar
with biological males dressed as females?
If you had basic maturity, you'd be fine with trans women in women's
spaces. It's always stunted-growth, arrested-development bitches who
are the TERFs. They can fuck off.
You do realize that SCOTUS judge Ketanji Jackson was unable to define a woman.
--
pothead

Why did Joe Biden pardon his family?
Read below to learn the reason.
The Biden Crime Family Timeline here:
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/
Joel
2025-02-06 00:44:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Joel
Post by pothead
Your honor, so it's acceptable for biological females to be forced to shower, share locker rooms
and so forth with biological males? So why is it not acceptable for biological males to share similar
with biological males dressed as females?
If you had basic maturity, you'd be fine with trans women in women's
spaces. It's always stunted-growth, arrested-development bitches who
are the TERFs. They can fuck off.
You do realize that SCOTUS judge Ketanji Jackson was unable to define a woman.
Well it's not the easiest thing to answer verbally, in a session like
the judiciary committee would've had with her. As with a lot of
things, "you know it when you see it" - my GF has a cock and two
balls, but you'd never think that meeting her clothed.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
Governor Swill
2025-02-06 06:47:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Joel
Post by pothead
Post by Joel
Post by pothead
Your honor, so it's acceptable for biological females to be forced to shower, share locker rooms
and so forth with biological males? So why is it not acceptable for biological males to share similar
with biological males dressed as females?
If you had basic maturity, you'd be fine with trans women in women's
spaces. It's always stunted-growth, arrested-development bitches who
are the TERFs. They can fuck off.
You do realize that SCOTUS judge Ketanji Jackson was unable to define a woman.
Well it's not the easiest thing to answer verbally, in a session like
the judiciary committee would've had with her. As with a lot of
things, "you know it when you see it" - my GF has a cock and two
balls, but you'd never think that meeting her clothed.
Any guy can put on a dress.

If you have a dick, you go there. If not, you go here.

NEXT!
Joel
2025-02-06 07:00:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Governor Swill
Post by Joel
Post by pothead
Post by Joel
Post by pothead
Your honor, so it's acceptable for biological females to be forced to shower, share locker rooms
and so forth with biological males? So why is it not acceptable for biological males to share similar
with biological males dressed as females?
If you had basic maturity, you'd be fine with trans women in women's
spaces. It's always stunted-growth, arrested-development bitches who
are the TERFs. They can fuck off.
You do realize that SCOTUS judge Ketanji Jackson was unable to define a woman.
Well it's not the easiest thing to answer verbally, in a session like
the judiciary committee would've had with her. As with a lot of
things, "you know it when you see it" - my GF has a cock and two
balls, but you'd never think that meeting her clothed.
Any guy can put on a dress.
If you have a dick, you go there. If not, you go here.
NEXT!
That's pretty out of touch and date, "governor", if a trans woman is
required to enter the male spaces, there's substantial threat *to
her*, whereas she isn't a threat to women in the female space. You're
of course suggesting men could *pose as* trans women, which is a
legitimate concern and would be a serious problem, however it would
seem obvious that for such a man to get away with it, they'd have to
be really careful, looking the part (not trivial), not behaving in an
untoward way around the cis women. A perv who'd do this to get into
that space is more likely to do something stupid, and get kicked out
or even arrested.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
Skeeter
2025-02-06 15:05:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Joel
Post by Governor Swill
Post by Joel
Post by pothead
Post by Joel
Post by pothead
Your honor, so it's acceptable for biological females to be forced to shower, share locker rooms
and so forth with biological males? So why is it not acceptable for biological males to share similar
with biological males dressed as females?
If you had basic maturity, you'd be fine with trans women in women's
spaces. It's always stunted-growth, arrested-development bitches who
are the TERFs. They can fuck off.
You do realize that SCOTUS judge Ketanji Jackson was unable to define a woman.
Well it's not the easiest thing to answer verbally, in a session like
the judiciary committee would've had with her. As with a lot of
things, "you know it when you see it" - my GF has a cock and two
balls, but you'd never think that meeting her clothed.
Any guy can put on a dress.
If you have a dick, you go there. If not, you go here.
NEXT!
That's pretty out of touch and date, "governor", if a trans woman is
required to enter the male spaces, there's substantial threat *to
her*, whereas she isn't a threat to women in the female space. You're
of course suggesting men could *pose as* trans women, which is a
legitimate concern and would be a serious problem, however it would
seem obvious that for such a man to get away with it, they'd have to
be really careful, looking the part (not trivial), not behaving in an
untoward way around the cis women. A perv who'd do this to get into
that space is more likely to do something stupid, and get kicked out
or even arrested.
Trump fixed that nonsense.
Scout
2025-02-06 17:17:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Joel
Post by Governor Swill
Post by Joel
Post by pothead
Post by Joel
Post by pothead
Your honor, so it's acceptable for biological females to be forced to
shower, share locker rooms
and so forth with biological males? So why is it not acceptable for
biological males to share similar
with biological males dressed as females?
If you had basic maturity, you'd be fine with trans women in women's
spaces. It's always stunted-growth, arrested-development bitches who
are the TERFs. They can fuck off.
You do realize that SCOTUS judge Ketanji Jackson was unable to define a woman.
Well it's not the easiest thing to answer verbally, in a session like
the judiciary committee would've had with her. As with a lot of
things, "you know it when you see it" - my GF has a cock and two
balls, but you'd never think that meeting her clothed.
Any guy can put on a dress.
If you have a dick, you go there. If not, you go here.
NEXT!
That's pretty out of touch and date, "governor", if a trans woman is
required to enter the male spaces, there's substantial threat *to
him*,
Corrected your misspelling.
Siri Cruise
2025-02-06 20:19:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Scout
Post by Joel
That's pretty out of touch and date, "governor", if a trans
woman is
required to enter the male spaces, there's substantial threat *to
him*,
Corrected your misspelling.
The Eighth does not mention male, female, whatever. It says no
person regardless of your criteria can be subject to cruel or
unusual punishment.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
Humphrey
2025-02-06 22:46:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Scout
Post by Joel
That's pretty out of touch and date, "governor", if a trans woman is
required to enter the male spaces, there's substantial threat *to
him*,
Corrected your misspelling.
The Eighth does not mention male, female, whatever. It says no person
regardless of your criteria can be subject to cruel or unusual punishment.
Doesn't apply.

"Transgenders" are not a person or place, however they are a "thing".
NoBody
2025-02-07 11:33:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 12:19:54 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by Scout
Post by Joel
That's pretty out of touch and date, "governor", if a trans
woman is
required to enter the male spaces, there's substantial threat *to
him*,
Corrected your misspelling.
The Eighth does not mention male, female, whatever. It says no
person regardless of your criteria can be subject to cruel or
unusual punishment.
So you admit that the 8th does not permit the state to force men and
women to use the same bathrooms as trans people. This is progress
for you!
s sanders
2025-02-07 17:43:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 12:19:54 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by Scout
Post by Joel
That's pretty out of touch and date, "governor", if a trans woman is
required to enter the male spaces, there's substantial threat *to
him*,
Corrected your misspelling.
The Eighth does not mention male, female, whatever. It says no
person regardless of your criteria can be subject to cruel or
unusual punishment.
So you admit that the 8th does not permit the state to force men and
women  to use the same bathrooms as trans people.  This is progress
for you!
The eighth amendment has nothing to do with toilets. It pertains only to
criminal defendants and convicts.
Requiring a man wearing a dress to use the correct toilet isn't cruel or
unusual punishment. When you're not wearing your dress in the Jolly
Kone parking lot you use the correct facilities for your birth gender.
Skeeter
2025-02-06 15:04:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Joel
Post by pothead
Post by Joel
Post by pothead
Your honor, so it's acceptable for biological females to be forced to shower, share locker rooms
and so forth with biological males? So why is it not acceptable for biological males to share similar
with biological males dressed as females?
If you had basic maturity, you'd be fine with trans women in women's
spaces. It's always stunted-growth, arrested-development bitches who
are the TERFs. They can fuck off.
You do realize that SCOTUS judge Ketanji Jackson was unable to define a woman.
Well it's not the easiest thing to answer verbally, in a session like
the judiciary committee would've had with her. As with a lot of
things, "you know it when you see it" - my GF has a cock and two
balls, but you'd never think that meeting her clothed.
You admitted it.
Scout
2025-02-06 17:19:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Joel
Post by pothead
Post by Joel
Post by pothead
Your honor, so it's acceptable for biological females to be forced to
shower, share locker rooms
and so forth with biological males? So why is it not acceptable for
biological males to share similar
with biological males dressed as females?
If you had basic maturity, you'd be fine with trans women in women's
spaces. It's always stunted-growth, arrested-development bitches who
are the TERFs. They can fuck off.
You do realize that SCOTUS judge Ketanji Jackson was unable to define a woman.
Well it's not the easiest thing to answer verbally, in a session like
the judiciary committee would've had with her. As with a lot of
things, "you know it when you see it" - my GF has a cock and two
balls, but you'd never think that meeting her clothed.
You admitted it.
Besides, putting lip stick on a pig doesn't make it a woman.

Meanwhile, we acknowledge Joel's admission his 'girl' friend isn't a girl
but is instead a cross dressing homosexual.
Loading...