Discussion:
Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security
Add Reply
Lester Thorpe
2024-10-21 19:07:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their GNU/Linux
distros with performance degrading security "features" should take note
of the latest exclamations of Linus Torvalds:

"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and completely theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in practice."

https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds-growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks

Tell 'em, Linus! Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop computing!

To keep my workstation free of these ridiculous "mitigations" I have
to devote some slightly significant time -- and I don't like it.

At the very least, separate the desktop workstation from the public-facing
sever as these have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT "security" concerns.

I am sick of these "the sky is falling" security-obsessed idiots.
--
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.
Phillip Frabott
2024-10-22 11:44:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lester Thorpe
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their GNU/Linux
distros with performance degrading security "features" should take note
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and completely theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds-growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus! Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop computing!
To keep my workstation free of these ridiculous "mitigations" I have
to devote some slightly significant time -- and I don't like it.
At the very least, separate the desktop workstation from the public-facing
sever as these have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT "security" concerns.
I am sick of these "the sky is falling" security-obsessed idiots.
Original Post is here:
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Torvalds-Frustrated-Buggy-HW
--
Phillip Frabott
----------
- Adam: Is a void really a void if it returns?
- Jack: No, it's just nullspace at that point.
----------
bad sector
2024-10-22 12:32:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Phillip Frabott
Post by Lester Thorpe
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their GNU/Linux
distros with performance degrading security "features" should take note
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and completely theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds-
growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus!  Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop computing!
To keep my workstation free of these ridiculous "mitigations" I have
to devote some slightly significant time -- and I don't like it.
At the very least, separate the desktop workstation from the public-
facing
sever as these have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT "security" concerns.
I am sick of these "the sky is falling" security-obsessed idiots.
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Torvalds-Frustrated-Buggy-HW
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
The Natural Philosopher
2024-10-22 12:34:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by bad sector
Post by Phillip Frabott
Post by Lester Thorpe
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their GNU/Linux
distros with performance degrading security "features" should take note
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and completely theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds-
growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus!  Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop computing!
To keep my workstation free of these ridiculous "mitigations" I have
to devote some slightly significant time -- and I don't like it.
At the very least, separate the desktop workstation from the public-
facing
sever as these have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT "security" concerns.
I am sick of these "the sky is falling" security-obsessed idiots.
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Torvalds-Frustrated-Buggy-HW
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
And then a raspberry Pi will cost $1000 instead of $100
--
"Nature does not give up the winter because people dislike the cold."

― Confucius
Phillip Frabott
2024-10-22 13:15:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by The Natural Philosopher
Post by bad sector
Post by Phillip Frabott
Post by Lester Thorpe
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their GNU/
Linux
distros with performance degrading security "features" should take note
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and completely theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds-
growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus!  Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop computing!
To keep my workstation free of these ridiculous "mitigations" I have
to devote some slightly significant time -- and I don't like it.
At the very least, separate the desktop workstation from the public-
facing
sever as these have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT "security" concerns.
I am sick of these "the sky is falling" security-obsessed idiots.
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Torvalds-Frustrated-Buggy-HW
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
And then a raspberry Pi will cost $1000 instead of $100
Not likely. The Cortex-A76 costs around $17.24 per chip when purchased
as a bulk of 10,000 (minimum order) And given that the entire Rpi5 only
costs $31~ to manufacture that means that China is charging a good $12
per Rpi5 unit in export tariff (general wholesale revenue is $15.40 and
retail revenue is $21.59) So the extra $5 per chip made in the US or
Europe/Canada would end up being cheaper once you remove the tariff cost
from China, which would effectively pay for the $3 increase per chip and
give a $10 discount. (after running through all the wholesale/retail
costs the consumer would likely save $5-$7 per Rpi5.)

And even if it didn't, I don't think consumers will panic if their $80
Rpi5 costs $83 instead. If you're that poor that you can't afford $3
then you really don't need an Rpi5 anyways. Use that money to buy food
and other necessities for your life. Be smart with your money.

It's easy enough the take apart the components on the Rpi5 and source
them to get the pricing. The CPU is the most expensive part and at
$17.24 you can figure out that the rest of it is pretty cheap. I mean
resistors, transistors and other diodes are pennies in bulk and the
other chips and interfaces aren't that expensive. I mean the Rpi5's
Wi-Fi chip is like $2 in bulk 10,000. So it's really not that expensive.

The $80~ is based on US pricing so it might be different elsewhere in
the world. But you get the picture.
--
Phillip Frabott
----------
- Adam: Is a void really a void if it returns?
- Jack: No, it's just nullspace at that point.
----------
CrudeSausage
2024-10-22 13:18:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by The Natural Philosopher
Post by bad sector
Post by Phillip Frabott
Post by Lester Thorpe
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their GNU/Linux
distros with performance degrading security "features" should take note
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and completely theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds-
growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus!  Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop computing!
To keep my workstation free of these ridiculous "mitigations" I have
to devote some slightly significant time -- and I don't like it.
At the very least, separate the desktop workstation from the public-
facing
sever as these have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT "security" concerns.
I am sick of these "the sky is falling" security-obsessed idiots.
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Torvalds-Frustrated-Buggy-HW
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
And then a raspberry Pi will cost $1000 instead of $100
So you're in favour of slave labour because you can get your hobby
computer for less?
--
CrudeSausage
Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.
The Natural Philosopher
2024-10-22 13:25:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by The Natural Philosopher
Post by bad sector
Post by Phillip Frabott
Post by Lester Thorpe
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their GNU/Linux
distros with performance degrading security "features" should take note
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and
completely theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds-
growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus!  Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop computing!
To keep my workstation free of these ridiculous "mitigations" I have
to devote some slightly significant time -- and I don't like it.
At the very least, separate the desktop workstation from the
public- facing
sever as these have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT "security" concerns.
I am sick of these "the sky is falling" security-obsessed idiots.
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Torvalds-Frustrated-Buggy-HW
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual
production) to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
And then a raspberry Pi will cost $1000 instead of $100
So you're in favour of slave labour because you can get your hobby
computer for less?
well a lot of Muricans seem to be in favour of letting Putin destroy
Ukraine so tthey pay 21c a year less in income tax.
--
“The fundamental cause of the trouble in the modern world today is that
the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt."

- Bertrand Russell
CrudeSausage
2024-10-22 14:51:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by The Natural Philosopher
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by The Natural Philosopher
Post by bad sector
Post by Phillip Frabott
Post by Lester Thorpe
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their GNU/Linux
distros with performance degrading security "features" should take note
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and
completely theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds-
growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus!  Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop computing!
To keep my workstation free of these ridiculous "mitigations" I have
to devote some slightly significant time -- and I don't like it.
At the very least, separate the desktop workstation from the
public- facing
sever as these have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT "security" concerns.
I am sick of these "the sky is falling" security-obsessed idiots.
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Torvalds-Frustrated-Buggy-HW
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual
production) to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
And then a raspberry Pi will cost $1000 instead of $100
So you're in favour of slave labour because you can get your hobby
computer for less?
well a lot of Muricans seem to be in favour of letting Putin destroy
Ukraine  so tthey pay 21c a year less in income tax.
Funny enough, despite being Polish and knowing Russia's history with my
ancestral country, I too think that he should go ahead and demolish
Ukraine. For one, he has a right to defend his borders and Ukraine's
geography is an important part of that. Second, Ukraine's contested
regions already decided that they wanted to be a part of Russia but both
Ukraine and its American allies decided that democracy didn't matter.
Third, Ukraine remains a corrupt country which allows Western
politicians to launder their fortunes. That last reason alone is a good
reason to get rid of the administration.

I truly believe that anyone defending Zelensky and American involvement
in the war is easily manipulated by propaganda.
--
CrudeSausage
Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.
bad sector
2024-10-22 22:02:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by The Natural Philosopher
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by The Natural Philosopher
Post by bad sector
Post by Phillip Frabott
Post by Lester Thorpe
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their GNU/Linux
distros with performance degrading security "features" should take note
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and
completely theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds-
growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus!  Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop computing!
To keep my workstation free of these ridiculous "mitigations" I have
to devote some slightly significant time -- and I don't like it.
At the very least, separate the desktop workstation from the
public- facing
sever as these have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT "security" concerns.
I am sick of these "the sky is falling" security-obsessed idiots.
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Torvalds-Frustrated-Buggy-HW
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual
production) to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
And then a raspberry Pi will cost $1000 instead of $100
So you're in favour of slave labour because you can get your hobby
computer for less?
well a lot of Muricans seem to be in favour of letting Putin destroy
Ukraine  so tthey pay 21c a year less in income tax.
Funny enough, despite being Polish
hahaha! I shudda knowed from 'crudesausage' :-)))
Post by CrudeSausage
and knowing Russia's history with my
ancestral country, I too think that he should go ahead and demolish
Ukraine. For one, he has a right to defend his borders and Ukraine's
geography is an important part of that. Second, Ukraine's contested
regions already decided that they wanted to be a part of Russia but both
Ukraine and its American allies decided that democracy didn't matter.
Third, Ukraine remains a corrupt country which allows Western
politicians to launder their fortunes. That last reason alone is a good
reason to get rid of the administration.
I truly believe that anyone defending Zelensky and American involvement
in the war is easily manipulated by propaganda.
EVERYONE is manipulated 7/24, Smolensk was a tragic story but there are
many others like it involving various players.

<OT rant>

Right now Americans are going through the wringer having to elect either
a bolshewoke or a flunky while big-money makes sure that polarization
there too leaves only a very easily manipulated 1% to swing at will come
the crew-change, that oh so democratic-moment when they throw either a
red or a blue bone to the dogs to keep them quiet. As we turn into the
last stretch and the *entire planet* is glued to the TV sets and the US
elections, that same big-money is rolling on the floor crapping its
pants in a laughing fit.

</rant>
Donald Trump
2024-10-22 22:50:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
So you're in favour of slave labour because you can get your hobby
computer for less?
That's what undocumented migrants are for. Just use them as slaves and
you'll find they will stop coming to America, the land of opportunities
and welfare.

Frankly, the only way to solve the migrants coming to USA or Europe is
to bring back slavery. Slavery version 2.0 where they come to work
willingly without any coercion or shackles.
CrudeSausage
2024-10-22 23:49:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Donald Trump
Post by CrudeSausage
So you're in favour of slave labour because you can get your hobby
computer for less?
That's what undocumented migrants are for.
Illegal aliens. Anyone who uses the above term does not deserve to be read.

< snip >
--
CrudeSausage
Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-23 00:02:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Illegal aliens.
Declaring somebody “illegal” ... I wonder what that means? That they have
no legal right to exist?

(They used to do that--declaring somebody “illegal”--in Apartheid South
Africa.)
CrudeSausage
2024-10-23 00:28:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Illegal aliens.
Declaring somebody “illegal” ... I wonder what that means? That they have
no legal right to exist?
No, the meaning is very clear and you progressives are the ones playing
stupid in the hope of winning an argument by playing on emotions. They
are illegal because they made their way into a country through a blatant
disregard of the laws. Their first act in getting to their destination
is to commit a crime. The adjective _illegal_ applies to them because
they have no legal right to be within the borders of the country. They
are also alien because they never before set foot in the country and we
often have no idea where they are actually from since they discard all
identification the moment they get here.
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
(They used to do that--declaring somebody “illegal”--in Apartheid South
Africa.)
And they were right to do so. South Africa used to be a country of laws
and social order. The moment you retarded progressives decided that it
was all wrong, the country Whites built was given away to brain-dead
negroes and rampant crime has taken over. Soon, the population will
starve because those same criminals are murdering the only labour
capable of producing food: the Whites.

On every matter, you progressives are wrong. Every one of your ideas is
proven to be a failure but you are all too dense to realize how
destructive you are.
--
CrudeSausage
Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-23 04:39:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
(They used to do that--declaring somebody “illegal”--in Apartheid South
Africa.)
And they were right to do so. South Africa used to be a country of laws
and social order.
The whites were nutcases, let's face it. They had “whites-only”
hospitals, so somebody who needed care but wasn’t “white” had to be
taken elsewhere -- if they were lucky.

As a 20-something singer touring with the Manhattan Brothers, the
biggest Black band in South Africa, [Miriam Makeba] was involved
in a crash with a white family’s car that left the white father
and one of his children dead. The whites were bundled into an
ambulance and the Blacks were left to die on the side of a
provincial road. The local “white” hospital refused to treat them
and one of Makeba’s companions ended up dying an entirely
preventable death when he finally reached Johannesburg two days
later.

<https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2024/10/20/why-shouldnt-power-be-black-how-miriam-makeba-won-and-lost-the-us>
bad sector
2024-10-23 11:23:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
(They used to do that--declaring somebody “illegal”--in Apartheid South
Africa.)
And they were right to do so. South Africa used to be a country of laws
and social order.
The whites were nutcases, let's face it. They had “whites-only”
hospitals, so somebody who needed care but wasn’t “white” had to be
taken elsewhere -- if they were lucky.
As a 20-something singer touring with the Manhattan Brothers, the
biggest Black band in South Africa, [Miriam Makeba] was involved
in a crash with a white family’s car that left the white father
and one of his children dead. The whites were bundled into an
ambulance and the Blacks were left to die on the side of a
provincial road. The local “white” hospital refused to treat them
and one of Makeba’s companions ended up dying an entirely
preventable death when he finally reached Johannesburg two days
later.
<https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2024/10/20/why-shouldnt-power-be-black-how-miriam-makeba-won-and-lost-the-us>
Whoever did whatever in South Africa never did, never will, and
certainly doesn't define what is meant by any term elsewhere and that
includes 'illegal alien'. Illegal = unauthorised, unlawful; alien =
foreign, potentially hostile. Nothing complicated really i.e. a squatter
from elsewhere as would be someone who just waltzes into your
living-room and pitches tent there uninvited.
Joel
2024-10-23 11:31:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by bad sector
Whoever did whatever in South Africa never did, never will, and
certainly doesn't define what is meant by any term elsewhere and that
includes 'illegal alien'. Illegal = unauthorised, unlawful; alien =
foreign, potentially hostile. Nothing complicated really i.e. a squatter
from elsewhere as would be someone who just waltzes into your
living-room and pitches tent there uninvited.
Uh huh. You ever hear of Christopher Columbus? Was he born in the
Americas? Or did he just declare land to be the property of Spain,
without any rational basis? What the fuck do you think crackers
coming here were, if not "illegal immigrants"? Just because the
indigenous people hadn't created a system of government to make a law,
against their arrival? Despite the fact whities massacred indigenous
people, to gain territory here? Wake the fuck up.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
bad sector
2024-10-23 17:15:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Joel
Post by bad sector
Whoever did whatever in South Africa never did, never will, and
certainly doesn't define what is meant by any term elsewhere and that
includes 'illegal alien'. Illegal = unauthorised, unlawful; alien =
foreign, potentially hostile. Nothing complicated really i.e. a squatter
from elsewhere as would be someone who just waltzes into your
living-room and pitches tent there uninvited.
Uh huh. You ever hear of Christopher Columbus?
Sure, far too much even; he was a paper christian if at all whom the
vatican was about to BBQ so he quickly found himself a sweetheart deal
with the spanish queen to get the fuck outta Dodge and just in time.
Post by Joel
Was he born in the
Americas? Or did he just declare land to be the property of Spain,
without any rational basis? What the fuck do you think crackers
coming here were, if not "illegal immigrants"?
What DECIDED whom the land belonged to was the size of the Spanish navy,
also the British, the French, and the German to name the top guns. When
did you get off the boat?
Post by Joel
Just because the
indigenous people hadn't created a system of government to make a law,
against their arrival? Despite the fact whities massacred indigenous
people, to gain territory here?
Laws without power mean didley shit, but who was talking about the USA?
What is it with Americans that unless someone specifically says 'this is
not about the USA' they always think that everyone on usenet is by
default thinking and talking about them? The illegal migrant problem is
at crisis levels in Europe for example, far worse than stateside.
Post by Joel
Wake the fuck up.
Land is like a woman, belongs to the last man standing subject only to
her wanting any of him regardless. There is no ancestral 'right' that I
know of or would accept.
Joel
2024-10-25 09:43:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by bad sector
Post by Joel
Post by bad sector
Whoever did whatever in South Africa never did, never will, and
certainly doesn't define what is meant by any term elsewhere and that
includes 'illegal alien'. Illegal = unauthorised, unlawful; alien =
foreign, potentially hostile. Nothing complicated really i.e. a squatter
from elsewhere as would be someone who just waltzes into your
living-room and pitches tent there uninvited.
Uh huh. You ever hear of Christopher Columbus?
Sure, far too much even; he was a paper christian if at all whom the
vatican was about to BBQ so he quickly found himself a sweetheart deal
with the spanish queen to get the fuck outta Dodge and just in time.
Post by Joel
Was he born in the
Americas? Or did he just declare land to be the property of Spain,
without any rational basis? What the fuck do you think crackers
coming here were, if not "illegal immigrants"?
What DECIDED whom the land belonged to was the size of the Spanish navy,
also the British, the French, and the German to name the top guns. When
did you get off the boat?
Post by Joel
Just because the
indigenous people hadn't created a system of government to make a law,
against their arrival? Despite the fact whities massacred indigenous
people, to gain territory here?
Laws without power mean didley shit, but who was talking about the USA?
What is it with Americans that unless someone specifically says 'this is
not about the USA' they always think that everyone on usenet is by
default thinking and talking about them? The illegal migrant problem is
at crisis levels in Europe for example, far worse than stateside.
Post by Joel
Wake the fuck up.
Land is like a woman, belongs to the last man standing subject only to
her wanting any of him regardless. There is no ancestral 'right' that I
know of or would accept.
You're a fucking pig.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
bad sector
2024-10-25 21:33:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Joel
Post by bad sector
Post by Joel
Post by bad sector
Whoever did whatever in South Africa never did, never will, and
certainly doesn't define what is meant by any term elsewhere and that
includes 'illegal alien'. Illegal = unauthorised, unlawful; alien =
foreign, potentially hostile. Nothing complicated really i.e. a squatter
from elsewhere as would be someone who just waltzes into your
living-room and pitches tent there uninvited.
Uh huh. You ever hear of Christopher Columbus?
Sure, far too much even; he was a paper christian if at all whom the
vatican was about to BBQ so he quickly found himself a sweetheart deal
with the spanish queen to get the fuck outta Dodge and just in time.
Post by Joel
Was he born in the
Americas? Or did he just declare land to be the property of Spain,
without any rational basis? What the fuck do you think crackers
coming here were, if not "illegal immigrants"?
What DECIDED whom the land belonged to was the size of the Spanish navy,
also the British, the French, and the German to name the top guns. When
did you get off the boat?
Post by Joel
Just because the
indigenous people hadn't created a system of government to make a law,
against their arrival? Despite the fact whities massacred indigenous
people, to gain territory here?
Laws without power mean didley shit, but who was talking about the USA?
What is it with Americans that unless someone specifically says 'this is
not about the USA' they always think that everyone on usenet is by
default thinking and talking about them? The illegal migrant problem is
at crisis levels in Europe for example, far worse than stateside.
Post by Joel
Wake the fuck up.
Land is like a woman, belongs to the last man standing subject only to
her wanting any of him regardless. There is no ancestral 'right' that I
know of or would accept.
You're a fucking pig.
Wow, ad-hominem, whadda man! I knew about and admired first nations long
before you got to the point of desperately gasping for a pinhole in your
old man's condom. They did have laws and rules and they certainly did
put up a valiant fight, but they lost. So called ancestral rights cannot
be a basis for the simple reason that records don't go back to Adam and
Eve and when justice is thus structurally impossible but injustice is
virtually guaranteed it's all non-avenue. There has to be negotiation,
war unfortunately being the last and loudest form of which.
The Natural Philosopher
2024-10-25 21:47:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On 25/10/2024 22:33, bad sector wrote:
records don't go back to Adam and
Post by bad sector
Eve and when justice is thus structurally impossible but injustice is
virtually guaranteed it's all non-avenue. There has to be negotiation,
war unfortunately being the last and loudest form of which.
This is why it is far better to simply kill all the menfolk and use the
women folk for sex slaves.

No one is left to pay reparations to...
--
"Anyone who believes that the laws of physics are mere social
conventions is invited to try transgressing those conventions from the
windows of my apartment. (I live on the twenty-first floor.) "

Alan Sokal
The Natural Philosopher
2024-10-26 00:07:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by bad sector
records don't go back to Adam and
Post by bad sector
Eve and when justice is thus structurally impossible but injustice is
virtually guaranteed it's all non-avenue. There has to be
negotiation, war unfortunately being the last and loudest form of which.
This is why it is far better to simply kill all the menfolk and use
the women folk for sex slaves.
No one is left to pay reparations to...
Only one snag, they like hebrews and a few others trace descendence
through the mother.
A clear case of making the women adopt a culture that doesn't
That said, there is much we could/should have
learned from them: "Taking only what you need on your journey, otherwise
leave the land as you had found it". Haitians have clear-cut the
mountains and the rains have washed all the soil off them. No tree will
EVER grow there again.
Well that of course is plan juvenile.
We did that years ago in Britain to build ships with.
The trees however are recovering pretty well
--
"The great thing about Glasgow is that if there's a nuclear attack it'll
look exactly the same afterwards."

Billy Connolly
bad sector
2024-10-26 00:38:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by The Natural Philosopher
Post by bad sector
records don't go back to Adam and
Post by bad sector
Eve and when justice is thus structurally impossible but injustice
is virtually guaranteed it's all non-avenue. There has to be
negotiation, war unfortunately being the last and loudest form of which.
This is why it is far better to simply kill all the menfolk and use
the women folk for sex slaves.
No one is left to pay reparations to...
Only one snag, they like hebrews and a few others trace descendence
through the mother.
A clear case of making the women adopt a culture that doesn't
"Taking only what you need on your journey, otherwise leave the land
as you had found it". Haitians have clear-cut the mountains and the
rains have washed all the soil off them. No tree will EVER grow there
again.
Well that of course is plan juvenile.
We did that years ago in Britain to build ships with.
Not only in Britain, Quebec was "150 foot tall white pines as far as the
eye could see". Then your navy requisitioned AND harvested them all for
ship masts while no Quebecer had a right to touch them.
Post by The Natural Philosopher
The trees however are recovering pretty well
Trees don't grow on barren rock, reread your sig :-)
--
In 10,000 years we have consumed 3/4 of the trees since coming out of
the last ice age, going from some 30 trillion huge trees to 15 trillion
toothpicks good only to cut 2x4's! This gives some sense of the dioxide
absorbing greenery and capacity-destruction but if we look for the
actual amount of wood and branches then we find 4 and 6 inch trunks
where 4 FOOTERS once were! I suspect that in terms of board-feet or
foliage we have destroyed over 80%. No need to look at Brazil for
examples of the devastation, see here
Loading Image...
Loading Image...
Loading Image...
http://www.ameriquefrancaise.org/en/article-574/Saving_the_American_White_Pine.html
for an idea of what north american forests were like before our race of
locusts robbed it from the care of first-nations. Harvesting on public
(crown i.e. people's) land should require a % of very large trunk sizes
harvested, thus effectively limiting the cut when those have been
over-rarified. In addition every human being should be charged with the
planting of 1 tree per month throughout his or her life (say 1000 trees
per person), such being the TRUE SCOPE of what we have allowed
bean-counters and money-changers to do to our spaceship home.
rbowman
2024-10-26 06:38:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by bad sector
Not only in Britain, Quebec was "150 foot tall white pines as far as the
eye could see". Then your navy requisitioned AND harvested them all for
ship masts while no Quebecer had a right to touch them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pine_Tree_Riot

The people of New Hampshire disputed that. I enjoyed living there until it
started drifting left and I sought greener pastures.
Joel
2024-10-23 00:34:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Illegal aliens.
Declaring somebody “illegal” ... I wonder what that means? That they have
no legal right to exist?
(They used to do that--declaring somebody “illegal”--in Apartheid South
Africa.)
Andrzej believes only white people have rights.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
D
2024-10-23 08:05:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Donald Trump
Post by CrudeSausage
So you're in favour of slave labour because you can get your hobby
computer for less?
That's what undocumented migrants are for.
Illegal aliens. Anyone who uses the above term does not deserve to be read.
< snip >
This is the truth. "Migrant" is a weasel word created by the left in order
to slip in the unstated assumption that they somehow have the right to
stay where ever they choose to settle down. It is incorrect and dishonest.

Illegal alien is what they are. Period.
CrudeSausage
2024-10-23 17:01:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by D
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Donald Trump
Post by CrudeSausage
So you're in favour of slave labour because you can get your hobby
computer for less?
That's what undocumented migrants are for.
Illegal aliens. Anyone who uses the above term does not deserve to be read.
< snip >
This is the truth. "Migrant" is a weasel word created by the left in
order to slip in the unstated assumption that they somehow have the
right to stay where ever they choose to settle down. It is incorrect and
dishonest.
Illegal alien is what they are. Period.
I don't even think they deserve to be called leftists anymore. They are
stupid and should be called such. There is the right and the stupid.
--
CrudeSausage
Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-23 21:29:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
I don't even think they deserve to be called leftists anymore. They are
stupid and should be called such. There is the right and the stupid.
Have you anti-abortionists figured out yet whether you support IVF or not?
Does “life begin at conception” apply in a Petri dish as well, or only in
a woman’s body?
CrudeSausage
2024-10-24 01:17:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
I don't even think they deserve to be called leftists anymore. They are
stupid and should be called such. There is the right and the stupid.
Have you anti-abortionists figured out yet whether you support IVF or not?
Does “life begin at conception” apply in a Petri dish as well, or only in
a woman’s body?
I don't speak for all of us who don't believe in infanticide as you do.
--
CrudeSausage
Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-24 03:48:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
I don't even think they deserve to be called leftists anymore. They
are stupid and should be called such. There is the right and the
stupid.
Have you anti-abortionists figured out yet whether you support IVF or
not? Does “life begin at conception” apply in a Petri dish as well, or
only in a woman’s body?
I don't speak for all of us who don't believe in infanticide as you do.
Is IVF “infanticide” as well?
The Natural Philosopher
2024-10-24 11:40:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
I don't even think they deserve to be called leftists anymore. They are
stupid and should be called such. There is the right and the stupid.
Have you anti-abortionists figured out yet whether you support IVF or not?
Does “life begin at conception” apply in a Petri dish as well, or only in
a woman’s body?
Humanitary exception can be made in the case of a married hetero couple
who cannot procreate otherwise, and what the left calls anti-abortion is
actually anti-UNCONDITIONAL-abortion i.e. anti
abortion-as-birth-control. That said, society should require cognitive,
IQ, and psy. testing for a permit to marry, procreate, vote, drive a car
or own guns, the last two on a yearly basis. The left is misreading and
twisting everything ever since it created the twiggy movement (to eat no
fats) because its barbie-boy neo-males with trimmed little goaties to
appear more masculine than they actually are needed a skinny less
intimidating female form promising easier access to underdeveloped
sexual organs. Unfortunately fats are needed by the brain to function.
Enter the WOKE generation: mama-molested fuckbrain zombies.
Christ on a bike.

In the end women wanting to rid themselves of a child always find a way.
Half of the argument to legalise it was to get rid of 'back street'
abortionists feeding poisons to or sticking knitting needles in the mother.

Many of whom died.

Having different laws to a next door country simply encourages abortion
tourism. Plenty of nice Irish catholic girls took a trip to London...

..if it was outlawed in Montana, they would doubtless find a short trip
to California of use...

But the whole mess is all part of people taking up *moral* positions.

Buying into to socialists 'fairness' and 'justice' or religious 'right
to life' and other such hand wavery bollocks.

The fact is that legalisation brought no more abortions, just less
deaths of mothers.
--
“Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit
atrocities.”

― Voltaire, Questions sur les Miracles à M. Claparede, Professeur de
Théologie à Genève, par un Proposant: Ou Extrait de Diverses Lettres de
M. de Voltaire
CrudeSausage
2024-10-24 13:10:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by The Natural Philosopher
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
I don't even think they deserve to be called leftists anymore. They are
stupid and should be called such. There is the right and the stupid.
Have you anti-abortionists figured out yet whether you support IVF or not?
Does “life begin at conception” apply in a Petri dish as well, or only in
a woman’s body?
Humanitary exception can be made in the case of a married hetero
couple who cannot procreate otherwise, and what the left calls
anti-abortion is actually anti-UNCONDITIONAL-abortion i.e. anti
abortion-as-birth-control. That said, society should require
cognitive, IQ, and psy. testing for a permit to marry, procreate,
vote, drive a car or own guns, the last two on a yearly basis. The
left is misreading and twisting everything ever since it created the
twiggy movement (to eat no fats) because its barbie-boy neo-males with
trimmed little goaties to appear more masculine than they actually are
needed a skinny less intimidating female form promising easier access
to underdeveloped sexual organs. Unfortunately fats are needed by the
brain to function. Enter the WOKE generation: mama-molested fuckbrain
zombies.
Christ on a bike.
Heresy.
Post by The Natural Philosopher
In the end women wanting to rid themselves of a child always find a way.
So let's not even _try_ to child, right? Only stupid people can be this
pessimistic.
Post by The Natural Philosopher
Half of the argument to legalise it was to get rid of 'back street'
abortionists feeding poisons to or sticking knitting needles in the mother.
Many of whom died.
Having different laws to a next door country simply encourages abortion
tourism. Plenty of nice Irish catholic girls took a trip to London...
..if it was outlawed in Montana, they would doubtless find a short trip
to California of use...
If the infanticide procedure itself costs them something, they shouldn't
worry about the cost of the trip to a state where such infanticide is
permitted. As long as taxpayers don't have to share the burden, I have
no issue.
Post by The Natural Philosopher
But the whole mess is all part of people taking up *moral* positions.
Buying into to socialists 'fairness' and 'justice' or religious 'right
to life' and other such hand wavery bollocks.
The fact is that legalisation brought no more abortions, just less
deaths of mothers.
I apologize for not crying over the mothers who would willingly
sacrifice both child and themselves.
--
CrudeSausage
Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-24 22:26:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
If the infanticide procedure itself costs them something, they shouldn't
worry about the cost of the trip to a state where such infanticide is
permitted. As long as taxpayers don't have to share the burden, I have
no issue.
Do you count IVF as an “infanticide procedure”?
bad sector
2024-10-24 13:45:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by The Natural Philosopher
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
I don't even think they deserve to be called leftists anymore. They are
stupid and should be called such. There is the right and the stupid.
Have you anti-abortionists figured out yet whether you support IVF or not?
Does “life begin at conception” apply in a Petri dish as well, or only in
a woman’s body?
Humanitary exception can be made in the case of a married hetero
couple who cannot procreate otherwise, and what the left calls anti-
abortion is actually anti-UNCONDITIONAL-abortion i.e. anti abortion-
as-birth-control. That said, society should require cognitive, IQ, and
psy. testing for a permit to marry, procreate, vote, drive a car or
own guns, the last two on a yearly basis. The left is misreading and
twisting everything ever since it created the twiggy movement (to eat
no fats) because its barbie-boy neo-males with trimmed little goaties
to appear more masculine than they actually are needed a skinny less
intimidating female form promising easier access to underdeveloped
sexual organs. Unfortunately fats are needed by the brain to function.
Enter the WOKE generation: mama-molested fuckbrain zombies.
Christ on a bike.
In the end women wanting to rid themselves of a child always find a way.
Half of the argument to legalise it was to get rid of 'back street'
abortionists feeding poisons to or sticking knitting needles in the mother.
Many of whom died.
Having different laws to a next door country simply encourages abortion
tourism. Plenty of nice Irish catholic girls took a trip to London...
..if it was outlawed in Montana, they would doubtless find a short trip
to California of use...
But the whole mess is all part of people taking up *moral* positions.
A mother's health, not to mention risk to life, are protected *as is*
just about everywhere. Admitted that there ARE a few backwoods
hog-humping states that really belong in the movie Deliverance, which is
why I disagree _somewhat_ with the otherwise very democratic idea of
leaving it to local authorities instead of centralizing. Still, no men
should ever have a say about it, votes on this should be reserved
exclusively to mothers and representatives who are mothers from city
hall to the supreme court.
The Natural Philosopher
2024-10-24 13:58:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
till, no men should ever have a say about it
Wait till some female aborts your child without even a by your leave
--
"It is an established fact to 97% confidence limits that left wing
conspirators see right wing conspiracies everywhere"
CrudeSausage
2024-10-24 15:39:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by The Natural Philosopher
till, no men should ever have a say about it
Wait till some female aborts your child without even a by your leave
I have read, heard and watched a number of stories from men who were
tricked into impregnating a woman, in and out of wedlock, and then had
their lives ruined by the woman. The women would lie about being on
birth control, would lie about not wanting the father to be in the life
of the child if ever they weren't, and so on only to turn around and
demand support without even allowing them to see the child they created
or have any say in how it is raised. Even when the man did things right
and married the woman before deciding to start a family, the woman would
use the reality that courts usually side with her in making sure that
the father would not only be forced to give her most of his paycheck,
but be forced to sit back and watch this nutcase raise the child to
become a deviant, often powerless to prevent their kid from turning into
a transsexual science project with Joel Crump's body and Chris
Ahlstrom's brain.

And they wonder why men don't want to get married or even get into
relationships anymore.
--
CrudeSausage
Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.
bad sector
2024-10-24 16:48:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by The Natural Philosopher
till, no men should ever have a say about it
Wait till some female aborts your child without even a by your leave
By 'say' I meant voting for/against interdicting legislation. Men
haven't got a clue about what it is to have been born a woman (and vice
versa), similarly if laws interdicting prostatectomy had to be written
(as poor an example as that may be) that vote should belong to men only.
Joel
2024-10-25 09:56:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by The Natural Philosopher
till, no men should ever have a say about it
Wait till some female aborts your child without even a by your leave
Keep your dick to yourself, and you won't have to worry about it. Duh.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-24 22:25:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by The Natural Philosopher
But the whole mess is all part of people taking up *moral* positions.
No, the whole mess is all part of people rationalizing their moral
positions based on religion. Keep your religion out of your morality, and
things become a lot simpler.
bad sector
2024-10-25 12:28:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by The Natural Philosopher
But the whole mess is all part of people taking up *moral* positions.
No, the whole mess is all part of people rationalizing their moral
positions based on religion. Keep your religion out of your morality, and
things become a lot simpler.
The word 'religion' lost its clarity or use a long time ago, I prefer
the term value-system which is a cultural product. If you were raised in
a garbage can then your first value-system is the garbage-can
value-system with which there is nothing wrong until you move to another
place with a different one, or you roll your own. The value-system of
the majority in any unit always makes the code of conduct within that
unit without which there is only chaos. A person's value-system is
his/her 'morality' regardless of whether s/he believes in God or is an
atheist so it has lost its punch as well except in one sense. Maybe
'humanism' still means something and as far as I can tell the loosely
christian (more or less aligned with the teachings of one we have been
told to call Jesus) tradition is the only humanist code in existance
today although I've met atheists who were just as humanists as most
christians.
CrudeSausage
2024-10-24 13:07:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
I don't even think they deserve to be called leftists anymore. They are
stupid and should be called such. There is the right and the stupid.
Have you anti-abortionists figured out yet whether you support IVF or not?
Does “life begin at conception” apply in a Petri dish as well, or only in
a woman’s body?
Humanitary exception can be made in the case of a married hetero couple
who cannot procreate otherwise, and what the left calls anti-abortion is
actually anti-UNCONDITIONAL-abortion i.e. anti
abortion-as-birth-control. That said, society should require cognitive,
IQ, and psy. testing for a permit to marry, procreate, vote, drive a car
or own guns, the last two on a yearly basis. The left is misreading and
twisting everything ever since it created the twiggy movement (to eat no
fats) because its barbie-boy neo-males with trimmed little goaties to
appear more masculine than they actually are needed a skinny less
intimidating female form promising easier access to underdeveloped
sexual organs. Unfortunately fats are needed by the brain to function.
Enter the WOKE generation: mama-molested fuckbrain zombies.
I agree with the entirety of the above paragraph, especially with the
idea that the stupid twist everything. I've too old to stomach it
anymore, so I would rather just filter out the stupid entirely.
--
CrudeSausage
Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.
Steve Hayes
2024-10-25 03:59:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by D
This is the truth. "Migrant" is a weasel word created by the left in order
to slip in the unstated assumption that they somehow have the right to
stay where ever they choose to settle down. It is incorrect and dishonest.
"Migrant" is simply an inclusive word to cover both immigrants and
emigrants. It refers to people who move from one country to another
regardless of whether they are coming or going, and regardless of
their reason for moving.

Follow-ups set, since not all migrants use Linux.
--
Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-23 00:00:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
So you're in favour of slave labour because you can get your hobby
computer for less?
Strange. I thought you wanted to take jobs away from those running those
manufacturing lines in the third world. Now you’re trying to sympathize
with them as “slave labour”?
CrudeSausage
2024-10-23 00:21:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
So you're in favour of slave labour because you can get your hobby
computer for less?
Strange. I thought you wanted to take jobs away from those running those
manufacturing lines in the third world. Now you’re trying to sympathize
with them as “slave labour”?
Do you purposefully misunderstand what you read? It is very clear that
the labour being used to produce less expensive computers is slave
labour. I have _always_ been in favour of products being sold in the
West being produced in the West. I would _never_ advocate for anything
sold here to be manufactured anywhere else, especially since it turns
out to be slave labour.
--
CrudeSausage
Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.
Computer Nerd Kev
2024-10-22 20:48:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by The Natural Philosopher
Post by bad sector
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
And then a raspberry Pi will cost $1000 instead of $100
You've somehow missed all their publicity about making Raspberry
Pis in the UK at Sony's factory in Wales?

https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2023/how-raspberry-pis-are-made-factory-tour

Granted not "all" are made in the UK (though that article claims
it's "the factory where almost every Raspberry Pi has been made"),
but it obviously isn't driving the price up that much, especially
as it includes their $5 RPi Zero boards.

But Raspberry Pi is clearly an outlier, compared to all the other
products made in China. Not needing to do assembly of their boards
in a case probably helps because that's where things get less
automated.
--
__ __
#_ < |\| |< _#
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-22 23:59:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
But Raspberry Pi is clearly an outlier ...
In other words, it’s not a copycat product. It’s innovative.

I think the predominant assumption in this thread is that the assembly
lines moved back to the West will be making exactly the same products as
the ones they want to replace.
bad sector
2024-10-22 20:57:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by The Natural Philosopher
Post by bad sector
Post by Phillip Frabott
Post by Lester Thorpe
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their GNU/
Linux
distros with performance degrading security "features" should take note
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and completely theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds-
growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus!  Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop computing!
To keep my workstation free of these ridiculous "mitigations" I have
to devote some slightly significant time -- and I don't like it.
At the very least, separate the desktop workstation from the public-
facing
sever as these have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT "security" concerns.
I am sick of these "the sky is falling" security-obsessed idiots.
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Torvalds-Frustrated-Buggy-HW
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
And then a raspberry Pi will cost $1000 instead of $100
The way I see it having stuff made 'over there' was OK when a piece of
printed circuit came on boat for a total of $5, now a motherboard or a
gpu, both full of bugs (and documentation so awful that a 3rd grader
would be ashamed enough of it to start wearing his pants on his head) is
$1000 up. That's a game changer if you ask me! The bit-coin miners also
had to do with it but the manufacturers may next regret having been too
greedy.
Jasen Betts
2024-10-24 02:48:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by The Natural Philosopher
Post by bad sector
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
And then a raspberry Pi will cost $1000 instead of $100
You want me to believe that Sony UK is currently manufacutring them 10 times
cheaper in Wales than is possible in USA?
--
Jasen.
🇺🇦 Слава Україні
CrudeSausage
2024-10-22 13:17:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by bad sector
Post by Phillip Frabott
Post by Lester Thorpe
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their GNU/Linux
distros with performance degrading security "features" should take note
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and completely theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds-
growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus!  Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop computing!
To keep my workstation free of these ridiculous "mitigations" I have
to devote some slightly significant time -- and I don't like it.
At the very least, separate the desktop workstation from the public-
facing
sever as these have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT "security" concerns.
I am sick of these "the sky is falling" security-obsessed idiots.
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Torvalds-Frustrated-Buggy-HW
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
Agreed. If the third-world masses want to come to the West then there is
no reason to keep sending labour there.
--
CrudeSausage
Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.
John McCue
2024-10-22 14:05:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
followups trimmed to comp.os.linux.misc

In comp.os.linux.misc bad sector <***@_invalid.net> wrote:
<snip>
Post by bad sector
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual
production) to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
That will not fix anything, the real fix is somehow these
companies need to stop chasing short-term profits that Wall
Street demands. This issue happens when testing is cut
short and if an issue is found, the hardware gets released
anyway because "Wall Street" and profits and bonuses.
--
[t]csh(1) - "An elegant shell, for a more... civilized age."
- Paraphrasing Star Wars
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-22 20:47:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by bad sector
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
It went away in the first place because it could not be done cost-
effectively in those “first-world” countries -- basic free-market
capitalism in action.

To bring it back would require Government subsidies, or forcing customers
to pay more. Which would you prefer?
bad sector
2024-10-22 22:03:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by bad sector
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
It went away in the first place because it could not be done cost-
effectively in those “first-world” countries -- basic free-market
capitalism in action.
So? Free-market capitalism, especially transborder, isn't everyone's cup
of tea.
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
To bring it back would require Government subsidies, or forcing customers
to pay more. Which would you prefer?
Nothing wrong with subsidies, I pay a lot more tax than some others but
no-one starves on the street around me, the sick get free surgery, etc.
The role of government is to be the bouncer or the black-ops gangster
who does WHATEVER is in the interest of *its* tax paying citizens. None
of this transcends state borders.
CrudeSausage
2024-10-22 23:36:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by bad sector
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
It went away in the first place because it could not be done cost-
effectively in those “first-world” countries -- basic free-market
capitalism in action.
To bring it back would require Government subsidies, or forcing customers
to pay more. Which would you prefer?
Considering the largest market for those products is the West,
particularly the United States, it would be possible to bring back
manufacturing by blocking sales of products that don't have a presence
in North America. They might not return all their manufacturing to the
West, but whatever is sold here would have to be made here. You can sell
it as an "environmental measure," explaining that you're trying avoid
intercontinental freight.
--
CrudeSausage
Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-22 23:57:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by bad sector
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
It went away in the first place because it could not be done cost-
effectively in those “first-world” countries -- basic free-market
capitalism in action.
To bring it back would require Government subsidies, or forcing
customers to pay more. Which would you prefer?
Considering the largest market for those products is the West,
particularly the United States, it would be possible to bring back
manufacturing by blocking sales of products that don't have a presence
in North America.
Easy way around that: set up an empty office like those in East Texas to
get jurisdiction under the patent-friendly courts there. There’s your
“presence”. Business continues from overseas as usual.

What’s your next move?
CrudeSausage
2024-10-23 00:19:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by bad sector
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
It went away in the first place because it could not be done cost-
effectively in those “first-world” countries -- basic free-market
capitalism in action.
To bring it back would require Government subsidies, or forcing
customers to pay more. Which would you prefer?
Considering the largest market for those products is the West,
particularly the United States, it would be possible to bring back
manufacturing by blocking sales of products that don't have a presence
in North America.
Easy way around that: set up an empty office like those in East Texas to
get jurisdiction under the patent-friendly courts there. There’s your
“presence”. Business continues from overseas as usual.
What’s your next move?
A manufacturing presence. The company would have to produce whatever it
sells on the continent it is selling to. I just re-read what I wrote and
what I meant was very clear.
--
CrudeSausage
Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-23 00:45:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by bad sector
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual
production) to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
It went away in the first place because it could not be done cost-
effectively in those “first-world” countries -- basic free-market
capitalism in action.
To bring it back would require Government subsidies, or forcing
customers to pay more. Which would you prefer?
Considering the largest market for those products is the West,
particularly the United States, it would be possible to bring back
manufacturing by blocking sales of products that don't have a presence
in North America.
Easy way around that: set up an empty office like those in East Texas
to get jurisdiction under the patent-friendly courts there. There’s
your “presence”. Business continues from overseas as usual.
What’s your next move?
A manufacturing presence. The company would have to produce whatever it
sells on the continent it is selling to.
How much of it? Disassembled parts? Or all the way back to raw ore?
bad sector
2024-10-23 01:17:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by bad sector
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual
production) to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
It went away in the first place because it could not be done cost-
effectively in those “first-world” countries -- basic free-market
capitalism in action.
To bring it back would require Government subsidies, or forcing
customers to pay more. Which would you prefer?
Considering the largest market for those products is the West,
particularly the United States, it would be possible to bring back
manufacturing by blocking sales of products that don't have a presence
in North America.
Easy way around that: set up an empty office like those in East Texas
to get jurisdiction under the patent-friendly courts there. There’s
your “presence”. Business continues from overseas as usual.
What’s your next move?
A manufacturing presence. The company would have to produce whatever it
sells on the continent it is selling to.
How much of it? Disassembled parts? Or all the way back to raw ore?
No point in splitting toothpicks, IF the US is in fact the biggest
market then the US calls the shots, all of them, period. I suspect that
with Europe added with a slightly larger population and comparable
living standards just about everything would be decided between those two.

I would exact the same % of manhours as my market share, and very
definitely all publications development & production in european
languages including english.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-23 01:46:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
IF the US is in fact the biggest> market then the US calls the shots,
all of them, period.
But it is no longer in that position, and not likely to get back into that
position. At least, not without a lot of pain that its citizens will not
put up with.
CrudeSausage
2024-10-23 14:06:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by bad sector
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual
production) to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
It went away in the first place because it could not be done cost-
effectively in those “first-world” countries -- basic free-market
capitalism in action.
To bring it back would require Government subsidies, or forcing
customers to pay more. Which would you prefer?
Considering the largest market for those products is the West,
particularly the United States, it would be possible to bring back
manufacturing by blocking sales of products that don't have a presence
in North America.
Easy way around that: set up an empty office like those in East Texas
to get jurisdiction under the patent-friendly courts there. There’s
your “presence”. Business continues from overseas as usual.
What’s your next move?
A manufacturing presence. The company would have to produce whatever it
sells on the continent it is selling to.
How much of it? Disassembled parts? Or all the way back to raw ore?
This statement demonstrates how much progressives care about the people
being enslaved in foreign countries to produce the goods we Westerners
purchase at low prices. They have a huge heart until you tell them that
their cell phone might cost $50 more because 'Bile in Africa is suddenly
getting a living wage.
--
CrudeSausage
Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-23 21:27:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by bad sector
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual
production) to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
It went away in the first place because it could not be done cost-
effectively in those “first-world” countries -- basic free-market
capitalism in action.
To bring it back would require Government subsidies, or forcing
customers to pay more. Which would you prefer?
Considering the largest market for those products is the West,
particularly the United States, it would be possible to bring back
manufacturing by blocking sales of products that don't have a
presence in North America.
Easy way around that: set up an empty office like those in East Texas
to get jurisdiction under the patent-friendly courts there. There’s
your “presence”. Business continues from overseas as usual.
What’s your next move?
A manufacturing presence. The company would have to produce whatever
it sells on the continent it is selling to.
How much of it? Disassembled parts? Or all the way back to raw ore?
This statement demonstrates ...
That you have no idea how to answer the question.
CrudeSausage
2024-10-24 12:57:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by bad sector
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual
production) to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
It went away in the first place because it could not be done cost-
effectively in those “first-world” countries -- basic free-market
capitalism in action.
To bring it back would require Government subsidies, or forcing
customers to pay more. Which would you prefer?
Considering the largest market for those products is the West,
particularly the United States, it would be possible to bring back
manufacturing by blocking sales of products that don't have a presence
in North America.
Easy way around that: set up an empty office like those in East Texas
to get jurisdiction under the patent-friendly courts there. There’s
your “presence”. Business continues from overseas as usual.
What’s your next move?
A manufacturing presence. The company would have to produce whatever it
sells on the continent it is selling to.
How much of it? Disassembled parts? Or all the way back to raw ore?
This statement demonstrates how much progressives care about the people
being enslaved in foreign countries to produce the goods we Westerners
purchase at low prices.
Indeed, it shows that progressives consider policy while conservatives
are only interested in rhetoric.
Complete bullshit.
--
CrudeSausage
Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-24 20:40:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Indeed, it shows that progressives consider policy while conservatives
are only interested in rhetoric.
Complete bullshit.
Rhetoric requires some ability to compose coherent sentences. Spouting
expletives does not.
Paul
2024-10-24 15:56:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
This statement demonstrates how much progressives care about the people being enslaved in foreign countries ...
Once you offshore, THERE IS NO TURNING BACK.

Darth Vader said it best:

"You don't know the POWER of the dark side".

Google "Don't be evil"
Google "We have a new plan"

Even if you had a national policy for a certain
thing, businessmen would work to thwart that plan.

Even in wartime, businessmen have done things going
against the country. For their own profit. And in more
than one political system.

Just keep reading your newspaper, OK ? Scumbags are everywhere.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/minister-jeremy-harrison-fired-crown-corp-board-chair-who-blew-the-whistle-on-apparent-conflicts-of-interest-1.7352049

Paul
CrudeSausage
2024-10-24 17:30:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Paul
This statement demonstrates how much progressives care about the people being enslaved in foreign countries ...
Once you offshore, THERE IS NO TURNING BACK.
Only if you don't care about your people. I am a nationalist so my own
people will always come first.
--
CrudeSausage
Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.
bad sector
2024-10-24 20:44:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Paul
Post by CrudeSausage
This statement demonstrates how much progressives care about the
people being enslaved in foreign countries ...
Once you offshore, THERE IS NO TURNING BACK.
Only if you don't care about your people. I am a nationalist so my own
people will always come first.
You don't even have to be a nationalist, motherboards and gpu's (some
research, automated printed circuit production and little more) costing
$1000 up are well within domestic margins as it is. It's just a question
of someone taking a swipe at it and THEN (because offshore WILL start
slashing prices if challenged) sticking to a strategic PLAN.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-24 22:23:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by bad sector
You don't even have to be a nationalist, motherboards and gpu's (some
research, automated printed circuit production and little more) costing
$1000 up are well within domestic margins as it is.
Why is Taiwan the world capital for computer hardware? Because the
Government had the foresight to support private investment in hardware
manufacturing back in the 1980s, which didn’t fully pay off for close to
another decade. But when it did pay off, it effectively killed off most PC
hardware manufacturing in the US and elsewhere.

Who in the US is going to take the risk of such a long-term investment?
They weren’t capable then, they’re even less capable now. You don’t even
believe in the idea that Government can be helpful to businesses, as
opposed to being an obstacle to them.
bad sector
2024-10-25 04:05:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by bad sector
You don't even have to be a nationalist, motherboards and gpu's (some
research, automated printed circuit production and little more) costing
$1000 up are well within domestic margins as it is.
Why is Taiwan the world capital for computer hardware? Because the
Government had the foresight to support private investment in hardware
manufacturing back in the 1980s, which didn’t fully pay off for close to
another decade. But when it did pay off, it effectively killed off most PC
hardware manufacturing in the US and elsewhere.
That money allowed them to cut prices and it was the low prices that
gave them sales. But now the prices are no longer low at all. Maybe it's
up to the buyers to stop dishing out big bucks for $5 boards.
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
You don’t even
believe in the idea that Government can be helpful to businesses, as
opposed to being an obstacle to them.
I don't recall having said that, but I do advocate that vital
infrastructure should not be trusted to private monopoly enterprise.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-25 04:37:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Why is Taiwan the world capital for computer hardware? Because the
Government had the foresight to support private investment in hardware
manufacturing back in the 1980s, which didn’t fully pay off for close
to another decade. But when it did pay off, it effectively killed off
most PC hardware manufacturing in the US and elsewhere.
That money allowed them to cut prices ...
Where did they get the money from?
bad sector
2024-10-25 12:47:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Why is Taiwan the world capital for computer hardware? Because the
Government had the foresight to support private investment in hardware
manufacturing back in the 1980s, which didn’t fully pay off for close
to another decade. But when it did pay off, it effectively killed off
most PC hardware manufacturing in the US and elsewhere.
That money allowed them to cut prices ...
Where did they get the money from?
To me it doesn't matter because it was over there and not over here. The
responsibility for protecting its own falls on sovereign governments so
when oriental cheap-labour combined with subsidies allowed them to
undercut then western governments should have countered not by
subsidising (you cannot cut out a hole) but by completely interdicting
those imports.
Donald Trump
2024-10-25 04:45:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Why is Taiwan the world capital for computer hardware? Because the
Government had the foresight to support private investment in hardware
manufacturing back in the 1980s, which didn’t fully pay off for close to
another decade. But when it did pay off, it effectively killed off most PC
hardware manufacturing in the US and elsewhere.
If this is true then the the Governments in the west must be very
incompetent to under-estimate the rise of Taiwan, China and India.

Demented Joe Biden and Kamala Harris did absolutely nothing to make
America Great Again or MAGA for short. It is time that you vote for me
to achieve your dreams to be self-reliant in all things "Made in the USA".

Undocumented migrants should be made to work for nothing to make them
realise that coming to the USA is not going to work for them. People
like CrudeSausage <***@sausa.ge> should also be made to live with them
in the slave tents and made to eat rotten foods thrown by rich Americans.
Paul
2024-10-25 06:25:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by bad sector
You don't even have to be a nationalist, motherboards and gpu's (some
research, automated printed circuit production and little more) costing
$1000 up are well within domestic margins as it is.
Why is Taiwan the world capital for computer hardware? Because the
Government had the foresight to support private investment in hardware
manufacturing back in the 1980s, which didn’t fully pay off for close to
another decade. But when it did pay off, it effectively killed off most PC
hardware manufacturing in the US and elsewhere.
Who in the US is going to take the risk of such a long-term investment?
They weren’t capable then, they’re even less capable now. You don’t even
believe in the idea that Government can be helpful to businesses, as
opposed to being an obstacle to them.
Labor cost is an input.

Some of the materials for domestic production, would be turnkey systems.
For example, a solder tunnel is a turnkey system. There can be a lot of
automation on some parts of the process. But test and integration is
an issue. (Asus might have a thousand women sitting at tables, doing test.
we don't have a thousand women sitting at tables doing that in North America.)
And anyone who has been remotely near one of our factories,
knows what a zoo it is inside. Every factory is a zoo. Even the
Asus factory will be a zoo. It's the nature of the beast.
Foxconn has 500,000 employees.

And to give you some idea how the two countries differ, to do a certain
repair procedure here (down the street from us), cost $1000. That operation
is only suited to a prototype PCB (cost is too high for any other purpose).
In Taiwan, the same procedure costs $25. Why ? well one of the reasons,
is the Taiwan dude doing them, is doing one after another, all day. He never stops.
Our local shop, he is paid to sit on his hands all week, and he does about
one a week. This means we could do better, with volume, but ultimately,
the pay rate of the two dudes is different. Not by much, but different.
The pay scale of a skilled tech worker in the foreign countries has risen
since we started offshoring. But it's still profitable to use them.
Not all the workers are skilled. The untrained ones are cheaper.
Some jobs need knowledgeable staff. There are still a lot of
humans that need *constant* supervision (why it is a zoo!).
Everyone has to pull on the oars in the same direction.
Our workers don't always do that.

If you automate everything (like Musk tried to do), the cost is high
for the equipment, and the profit from your little operation, has
to pay off that equipment. The equipment has to be programmed.
The maintenance staff to keep everything running, those are skilled
individuals. And on any given day, there can be a work stoppage
until some code or script is fixed up. In essence, the robots
are just as dumb, as some of the people they replaced. One thing
humans can do, is for trivial issues, they can work around the issue
until the root cause is resolved. Robots won't be doing it that way.
And no, don't say the word AI :-)

*******

What I didn't mention, is we have none of the humans discussed above.
We have no skilled workers. Once their jobs were offshored, they
became Uber drivers and UPS delivery people. They're not coming back.
we don't have enough professors with the right backgrounds, to
teach a new generation of people. There is a long period
of rebuilding the industry.

For example, years ago here, I could stop a guy on the street
and ask him if he could solder, and he probably could.
If I did that today, the teenager watching TikTok vids
on his phone would look up and say "what is solder?".
We're devoid of a certain kind of individual. Only some
places have clusters of tech workers now.

Consider a conversation I had with an HR person once, over a beer.
we were joking about something, and she tells me "when the resumes
come in, if a tech worker has been out of work for a year, I just
throw out their resume". She didn't read the resume, to find out
what skills she is throwing away. That gives you some idea, of the opinion
of HR to the state of the tech workers. Even if there were old farts
sitting around typing posts to USENEt, you would not hire them, because...
their resume was already thrown in the garbage :-) None of you
should be particularly surprised by this. Seeing the barrier yet ?
Seeing how difficult it is to bootstrap anything ? That's why my
estimate is, it would take twenty years effort to even get close
to rebuilding an industry. No business man is that patient. Sorry.

Paul
Charlie Gibbs
2024-10-25 17:32:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Paul
What I didn't mention, is we have none of the humans discussed above.
We have no skilled workers. Once their jobs were offshored, they
became Uber drivers and UPS delivery people. They're not coming back.
we don't have enough professors with the right backgrounds, to
teach a new generation of people. There is a long period
of rebuilding the industry.
No problem, the politicians have the answer: immigration.
Just bring in lots of skilled immigrants; they'll do everything
you need. You don't have to wait to educate your own people -
indeed, you can cut education funding and keep your natives in
that blessed state of ignorance so important to your power.
Post by Paul
Consider a conversation I had with an HR person once, over a beer.
we were joking about something, and she tells me "when the resumes
come in, if a tech worker has been out of work for a year, I just
throw out their resume". She didn't read the resume, to find out
what skills she is throwing away. That gives you some idea, of the opinion
of HR to the state of the tech workers. Even if there were old farts
sitting around typing posts to USENEt, you would not hire them, because...
their resume was already thrown in the garbage :-) None of you
should be particularly surprised by this. Seeing the barrier yet ?
Seeing how difficult it is to bootstrap anything ? That's why my
estimate is, it would take twenty years effort to even get close
to rebuilding an industry. No business man is that patient. Sorry.
It's so sad that HR departments spend so much time and effort
looking for someone with a highly-specific set of skills that
exactly matches their needs, rather than hiring people who can
quickly learn the skills necessary for not only the current
project but also the next one.
--
/~\ Charlie Gibbs | We'll go down in history as the
\ / <***@kltpzyxm.invalid> | first society that wouldn't save
X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | itself because it wasn't cost-
/ \ if you read it the right way. | effective. -- Kurt Vonnegut
Paul
2024-10-25 20:16:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Charlie Gibbs
It's so sad that HR departments spend so much time and effort
looking for someone with a highly-specific set of skills that
exactly matches their needs, rather than hiring people who can
quickly learn the skills necessary for not only the current
project but also the next one.
That is partly to save money. The individuals are supposed
to be instantly productive. They're "interchangeable parts".
One drops dead, use the same precise spec, off you go again.

And you can do that in mature industries.

If you were building an AI team today, I bet you would use a different set of
criteria for that. "Do you have any experiences at all, whatsoever
in AI?" would be the kind of question they would ask. And they
would mop up the candidates who even remotely resembled that role.
There would not be a line on the requisition "Must know Microsoft Office",
which is a popular bit of silliness.

Paul
Charlie Gibbs
2024-10-26 04:38:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Paul
There would not be a line on the requisition "Must know Microsoft Office",
which is a popular bit of silliness.
Then there were the ads in 1997 calling for people with
5 years' experience in Windows 95...
--
/~\ Charlie Gibbs | We'll go down in history as the
\ / <***@kltpzyxm.invalid> | first society that wouldn't save
X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | itself because it wasn't cost-
/ \ if you read it the right way. | effective. -- Kurt Vonnegut
rbowman
2024-10-26 05:38:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Paul
There would not be a line on the requisition "Must know Microsoft Office",
which is a popular bit of silliness.
Then there were the ads in 1997 calling for people with 5 years'
experience in Windows 95...
My favorites were the ads in the Boston Sunday Globe in the early '80s
looking for several years of Ada experience. At the time there wasn't a
working Ada compiler.

We never paid attention to the ads HR would place for programmers until
one interviewee asked about the requirements like 'able to run copier'
that they had cut'n'pasted from their office drone template.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-25 22:22:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Charlie Gibbs
No problem, the politicians have the answer: immigration.
In countries where the native birth rate is below replacement level, the
choice is either between encouraging immigration, or suffering the greying
of your entire populace.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-25 22:21:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
If I did that today, the teenager watching TikTok vids on his phone
would look up and say "what is solder?".
*Ahem* ... that particular example could be due to how you were
pronouncing it ...

... you know, “sole-der” versus “saw-der” ...
Consider a conversation I had with an HR person once, over a beer.
we were joking about something, and she tells me "when the resumes come
in, if a tech worker has been out of work for a year, I just throw out
their resume". She didn't read the resume, to find out what skills she
is throwing away. That gives you some idea, of the opinion of HR to the
state of the tech workers.
HR have long been infamous for howlers like demanding 3 years’ experience
in a technology that only came out the previous year ...
CrudeSausage
2024-10-25 10:57:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by bad sector
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Paul
Post by CrudeSausage
This statement demonstrates how much progressives care about the
people being enslaved in foreign countries ...
Once you offshore, THERE IS NO TURNING BACK.
Only if you don't care about your people. I am a nationalist so my own
people will always come first.
You don't even have to be a nationalist, motherboards and gpu's (some
research, automated printed circuit production and little more) costing
$1000 up are well within domestic margins as it is. It's just a question
of someone taking a swipe at it and THEN (because offshore WILL start
slashing prices if challenged) sticking to a strategic PLAN.
If that is indeed the case, I am all in favour of it. It's time for the
West to stop trying to raise lifestyles in foreign countries at its own
peril.
--
CrudeSausage
Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.
186282@ud0s4.net
2024-10-23 07:07:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lester Thorpe
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their GNU/Linux
distros with performance degrading security "features" should take note
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and completely theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds-growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus! Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop computing!
Linus is "kind-of right", but "kind-of not".

The problem is State-funded actors these days
and the MASSIVE computing power they can bring
to bear. At least SOME of those "theoretical"
attack vectors CAN become real attack vectors.

But WHICH ???

Yes, you can go totally overboard on "security",
and, mostly, it won't do much good. Paranoia can
push this to extremes where you can barely use
the system/apps (think Vista) - and I think that's
what Linus is concerned with.

However there ARE 'sensible' security measures
that go beyond mere Linux passwords and a few
port blocks.
Richard Kettlewell
2024-10-23 08:01:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
The problem is State-funded actors these days and the MASSIVE
computing power they can bring to bear.
Well, it’s _a_ problem, for people and organizations who are realistic
targets of state actors. But (for example) for most private individuals
the biggest threat is criminals trying to access their bank account or
credit card.
At least SOME of those "theoretical" attack vectors CAN become real
attack vectors.
But WHICH ???
The obvious answer is attacks on weak cryptography. RSA-1024 and DH-1024
are probably breakable by the biggest SIGINT agencies (and anyone else
with comparable compute resources: cloud service providers for example).

https://weakdh.org/imperfect-forward-secrecy.pdf attempted to analyse
this (among other things) nearly a decade ago, as a concrete example.
--
https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-24 04:48:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Kettlewell
The obvious answer is attacks on weak cryptography. RSA-1024 and DH-1024
are probably breakable by the biggest SIGINT agencies (and anyone else
with comparable compute resources: cloud service providers for example).
Weak cryptography is easy to fix. The hard part to fix is weak random
numbers.
Richard Kettlewell
2024-10-24 17:48:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Richard Kettlewell
The obvious answer is attacks on weak cryptography. RSA-1024 and DH-1024
are probably breakable by the biggest SIGINT agencies (and anyone else
with comparable compute resources: cloud service providers for example).
Weak cryptography is easy to fix. The hard part to fix is weak random
numbers.
Other way round. A bad RNG can be swapped out for a better one with
little or no impact on anything else. Cryptographic choices that are
baked into a protocol or API are a lot more challenging to shift.
--
https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-24 22:19:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Kettlewell
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Weak cryptography is easy to fix. The hard part to fix is weak random
numbers.
Other way round. A bad RNG can be swapped out for a better one with
little or no impact on anything else.
Unfortunately, you can never be sure your RNG is good.
candycanearter07
2024-10-25 18:10:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Richard Kettlewell
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Weak cryptography is easy to fix. The hard part to fix is weak random
numbers.
Other way round. A bad RNG can be swapped out for a better one with
little or no impact on anything else.
Unfortunately, you can never be sure your RNG is good.
You could always do what random.org does and read background radiation.
Probably.
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
rbowman
2024-10-25 19:36:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by candycanearter07
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Richard Kettlewell
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Weak cryptography is easy to fix. The hard part to fix is weak random
numbers.
Other way round. A bad RNG can be swapped out for a better one with
little or no impact on anything else.
Unfortunately, you can never be sure your RNG is good.
You could always do what random.org does and read background radiation.
Probably.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware_random_number_generator

Thermal noise is a problem when dealing with weak signals but can be used
in RNG.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-25 22:13:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by candycanearter07
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Unfortunately, you can never be sure your RNG is good.
You could always do what random.org does and read background radiation.
Probably.
You can read anything you like. You can never be sure that the digital
bits your CPU sees bear any relation to the raw random data your sensor
was picking up.
John Ames
2024-10-25 22:39:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 22:13:52 -0000 (UTC)
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
You can read anything you like. You can never be sure that the
digital bits your CPU sees bear any relation to the raw random data
your sensor was picking up.
In fact, you can never be truly certain of anything at all! Is all that
we see or seem/but a dream within a dream?
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-25 23:43:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by John Ames
In fact, you can never be truly certain of anything at all!
Can you be certain of that?
The Natural Philosopher
2024-10-26 00:08:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by John Ames
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 22:13:52 -0000 (UTC)
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
You can read anything you like. You can never be sure that the
digital bits your CPU sees bear any relation to the raw random data
your sensor was picking up.
In fact, you can never be truly certain of anything at all! Is all that
we see or seem/but a dream within a dream?
Indeed.
Welcome to the problems of metaphysics
--
"The great thing about Glasgow is that if there's a nuclear attack it'll
look exactly the same afterwards."

Billy Connolly
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-26 02:37:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by The Natural Philosopher
Welcome to the problems of metaphysics
Next stop: that wonderful fallacy known as “you can’t prove a
negative” ...
vallor
2024-10-26 04:06:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 02:37:52 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by The Natural Philosopher
Welcome to the problems of metaphysics
Next stop: that wonderful fallacy known as “you can’t prove a negative”
...
Prove it!
--
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
OS: Linux 6.11.5 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G
"Read my chips: No new upgrades!"
rbowman
2024-10-26 05:45:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by The Natural Philosopher
Welcome to the problems of metaphysics
Next stop: that wonderful fallacy known as “you can’t prove a negative”
...
About the time Heidegger asked 'Why are there beings at all rather than
nothing?' in 'Introduction to Metaphysics' my head started to hurt. That
was sentence 1, chapter 1. It didn't get better from there on.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-26 05:51:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by rbowman
About the time Heidegger asked 'Why are there beings at all rather than
nothing?' in 'Introduction to Metaphysics' my head started to hurt. That
was sentence 1, chapter 1. It didn't get better from there on.
Did he mention the Anthropic Principle at all?

That’s a controversial one. Fred Hoyle used it to predict the existence of
an energetic state of the carbon atom without which heavier elements could
not be synthesized.
vallor
2024-10-26 05:56:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by rbowman
Post by The Natural Philosopher
Welcome to the problems of metaphysics
Next stop: that wonderful fallacy known as “you can’t prove a negative”
...
About the time Heidegger asked 'Why are there beings at all rather than
nothing?' in 'Introduction to Metaphysics' my head started to hurt. That
was sentence 1, chapter 1. It didn't get better from there on.
Besides talking about the "Perennial Philosophy", I sometimes get drawn in
by the question of the source of consciousness.

The fact that we experience our subjective states, our qualia, our "I", is
danged miraculous...
--
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
OS: Linux 6.11.5 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G
"Ensign Expendable, step on that rock! - Kirk"
rbowman
2024-10-26 06:49:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by vallor
Besides talking about the "Perennial Philosophy", I sometimes get drawn
in by the question of the source of consciousness.
The fact that we experience our subjective states, our qualia, our "I",
is danged miraculous...
I lean toward the view that it's epiphenomena. Language arose as an
evolutionary benefit and now is used to tell ourselves stories about what
is going on.

186282@ud0s4.net
2024-10-25 05:09:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Kettlewell
The problem is State-funded actors these days and the MASSIVE
computing power they can bring to bear.
Well, it’s _a_ problem, for people and organizations who are realistic
targets of state actors. But (for example) for most private individuals
the biggest threat is criminals trying to access their bank account or
credit card.
At least SOME of those "theoretical" attack vectors CAN become real
attack vectors.
But WHICH ???
The obvious answer is attacks on weak cryptography. RSA-1024 and DH-1024
are probably breakable by the biggest SIGINT agencies (and anyone else
with comparable compute resources: cloud service providers for example).
https://weakdh.org/imperfect-forward-secrecy.pdf attempted to analyse
this (among other things) nearly a decade ago, as a concrete example.
Um ... even weak crypto takes a lot of CPU time to
decode.

Direct access to corp computers, where the victim's
system is doing all the work, via fake or compromised
corp users - I think *that* is the "biggest problem"
relative to data theft.

A lot of THAT involves "human engineering" - scams
that most ordinary workers will never detect despite
good 'educational' efforts. Scammers are VERY sneaky.

However poor security/auth measures and un-monitored
external access also plays a role - corp laziness
and/or budget limitations.

It's not just *a* problem - but weakness at a number
of levels.

Vlad's boyz have the time and resources to go after
ALL of them - over and over and over - until chinks
in the armor are found. Victims generally do NOT
have the resources, IQ/$$$, to defend.

Oh, and the golden gate to bank accts and industrial
control systems and such are all the numbers/data Vlad's
boyz steal - the stuff you use to prove you are you.

Oh, today's news - another health-care system finally
admits to being severely compromised ... 100 MILLION
detailed records stolen. Sorry, but everyone needs
all-NEW numbers for everything, like TOMORROW.
Otherwise when They hit the hit will be TOTAL, so
large deep and wide there will be no good fixes.
A nuke attack without a single mushroom cloud.

This is the world we have (mis)-made.

SO - Linus is *partially* correct, but also partially wrong.
It's the "wrong" fraction that's so worrisome.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-10-25 22:17:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Um ... even weak crypto takes a lot of CPU time to decode.
A graphic illustration of strong crypto used stupidly:
<Loading Image...>.
Phillip Frabott
2024-10-23 12:36:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lester Thorpe
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their GNU/Linux
distros with performance degrading security "features" should take note
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and completely theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds-
growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus!  Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop computing!
  Linus is "kind-of right", but "kind-of not".
  The problem is State-funded actors these days
  and the MASSIVE computing power they can bring
  to bear. At least SOME of those "theoretical"
  attack vectors CAN become real attack vectors.
  But WHICH ???
  Yes, you can go totally overboard on "security",
  and, mostly, it won't do much good. Paranoia can
  push this to extremes where you can barely use
  the system/apps (think Vista) - and I think that's
  what Linus is concerned with.
  However there ARE 'sensible' security measures
  that go beyond mere Linux passwords and a few
  port blocks.
I think the point that Linus was making was just that, even if these
'theoretical' attack vectors were actual issues, the CPU manufacturer's
need to be the one patching it with a firmware update. Hardware related
attacks need to be fixed by the hardware MFG and Linux should only fix
software related attack vectors. I think that was the point Linus was
making here. The kernel should not be the go-to agency for fixing
hardware-specific security issues, nor should it be the kernel's job
anyways. It's like, Boeing having a problem with an engine from another
manufacturer. Who fixes the engine? It should be the engine manufacturer
not some Boeing software engineer adding something to the throttle
control system to 'mitigate' the issue.

At least that was how I took it. I don't think Linus was trying to
downplay the security aspect of it. I think it's just, it's not a "Linux
Problem". Go fix your sh*t Intel/AMD. But that's just my take on the
article.
--
Phillip Frabott
----------
- Adam: Is a void really a void if it returns?
- Jack: No, it's just nullspace at that point.
----------
186282@ud0s4.net
2024-10-25 06:48:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Phillip Frabott
Post by Lester Thorpe
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their GNU/Linux
distros with performance degrading security "features" should take note
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and completely theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds-
growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus!  Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop computing!
   Linus is "kind-of right", but "kind-of not".
   The problem is State-funded actors these days
   and the MASSIVE computing power they can bring
   to bear. At least SOME of those "theoretical"
   attack vectors CAN become real attack vectors.
   But WHICH ???
   Yes, you can go totally overboard on "security",
   and, mostly, it won't do much good. Paranoia can
   push this to extremes where you can barely use
   the system/apps (think Vista) - and I think that's
   what Linus is concerned with.
   However there ARE 'sensible' security measures
   that go beyond mere Linux passwords and a few
   port blocks.
I think the point that Linus was making was just that, even if these
'theoretical' attack vectors were actual issues, the CPU manufacturer's
need to be the one patching it with a firmware update.
SOME of it is CPU, SOME is 'system', SOME will be
peripherial chips/drivers.

There's no ONE attack vector. Vlad's boyz have the
resources to put the proverbial battering ram to
every portal.

Oh, and CPU makers will ALWAYS be behind the curve.
This is the ever-repeating paradigm for attacks and
I don't think it can be fixed.
Post by Phillip Frabott
Hardware related
attacks need to be fixed by the hardware MFG and Linux should only fix
software related attack vectors. I think that was the point Linus was
making here. The kernel should not be the go-to agency for fixing
hardware-specific security issues, nor should it be the kernel's job
anyways. It's like, Boeing having a problem with an engine from another
manufacturer. Who fixes the engine? It should be the engine manufacturer
not some Boeing software engineer adding something to the throttle
control system to 'mitigate' the issue.
But again the TIME factor gets involved. No maker
"just knows" all the weaknesses of their chips/system/
apps. Their response is usually REACTIVE - but by then
the damage has been done. This is the Real Life bummer.
Post by Phillip Frabott
At least that was how I took it. I don't think Linus was trying to
downplay the security aspect of it. I think it's just, it's not a "Linux
Problem". Go fix your sh*t Intel/AMD. But that's just my take on the
article.
Linus is super-smart and practical - no question. But
even he can't guess ALL potential attack vectors, and
they MAY revolve around tiny flaws created a decade,
or decades, ago.

SOME of the ultra-paranoid, oft "committee" derived,
potential security issues ARE gonna be pure BS. The
question is WHICH ? External critics always go hawg
wild to make themselves look good, but they're not
wrong about *everything*.

It's a problem.

Now a SERIOUS problem as the cyber-wars are escalating
very rapidly.

SO ... what the hell do we DO ???

Ah ... C64s with dial-up and System-in-ROM !

Should have kept my C64 ... DO have a VIC-20
stashed somewhere though .... the executors of
my estate are gonna HATE my vast "weird stuff"
inventory, but, hey, I won't care :-)

He who dies with the most toys ...........

Hmm - wonder if my Sanyo mostly-pc-compatible
is worth anything ? Tandy proto-laptop with
actual Bill Gates code in it ? ZX-81 ? 8051
chip inventory ? Apple-II ??? :-)
Lester Thorpe
2024-10-24 18:53:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Yes, you can go totally overboard on "security",
and, mostly, it won't do much good. Paranoia can
push this to extremes where you can barely use
the system/apps (think Vista) - and I think that's
what Linus is concerned with.
You should read the comments in the Phoronix link.

Several posters indicate that there is a vast difference
between security that is relevant for a public-facing
server and for a desktop workstation. Furthermore, the
posters claim, most GNU/Linux distros are configured
for public-facing servers only.

This is totally ridiculous. As I already stated, there
should be a split between servers and workstations.
But there is not, and unless one "rolls ones own" then
one is stuck with a security-laden and crippled distro.
--
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.
186282@ud0s4.net
2024-10-25 06:58:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lester Thorpe
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Yes, you can go totally overboard on "security",
and, mostly, it won't do much good. Paranoia can
push this to extremes where you can barely use
the system/apps (think Vista) - and I think that's
what Linus is concerned with.
You should read the comments in the Phoronix link.
Several posters indicate that there is a vast difference
between security that is relevant for a public-facing
server and for a desktop workstation. Furthermore, the
posters claim, most GNU/Linux distros are configured
for public-facing servers only.
I'd kinda argue that even yer biz desktop PCs are
now "public-facing". There's probably a router
in there somewhere, but the Greater Connectivity
push kinda requires most desktops to be VERY
connected. Most biz do not have the IQ/$$$ to
look at, and mitigate, *everything*. Response
is 99% reactive, not pro-active.
Post by Lester Thorpe
This is totally ridiculous. As I already stated, there
should be a split between servers and workstations.
But there is not, and unless one "rolls ones own" then
one is stuck with a security-laden and crippled distro.
As said, I think the line between 'servers' and
'workstations' has blurred significantly and will
blur even more. The 'cloud' push puts most of the
data/access out of YOUR hands too. Yea, yea, you
can claim it's not YOUR fault, but .....

And then at least half the probs will be 'human
engineering' related too ... no software fixes.
Go ahead, fire the typical clueless worker, the
damage will already be done and you'll just have
to hire another clueless worker.
Loading...