Discussion:
Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms
Add Reply
Joel
2025-02-16 11:04:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/


So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021. OK. Great. Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
CrudeSausage
2025-02-16 13:53:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Joel
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/
So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021. OK. Great. Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks.
That is honestly very interesting. It's looking like Microsoft is
borrowing Apple's approach to support. I suppose that I should be
expecting my own processor to be unsupported with a future release.
--
God be with you,

CrudeSausage/
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
Johnny LaRue
2025-02-16 19:18:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Joel
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/
So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021. OK. Great. Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks.
That is honestly very interesting. It's looking like Microsoft is
borrowing Apple's approach to support.
Good. It's about damn time. Very hard to move forward when you are still
supporting ancient hardware (and software).

And let's face it. To have any future at all, Windows desperately needs to
move forward.
Post by CrudeSausage
I suppose that I should be
expecting my own processor to be unsupported with a future release.
See above.
CrudeSausage
2025-02-16 21:23:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Johnny LaRue
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Joel
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/
So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021. OK. Great. Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks.
That is honestly very interesting. It's looking like Microsoft is
borrowing Apple's approach to support.
Good. It's about damn time. Very hard to move forward when you are still
supporting ancient hardware (and software).
And let's face it. To have any future at all, Windows desperately needs to
move forward.
Have you ever considered that an operating system could offer layers of
functionality? For example, a 286 could run Windows 3.0, but if you
wanted the enhanced features, you needed a 386. Why can't it be that way
with Windows again?
--
God be with you,

CrudeSausage/
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
John 14:6
Adison Vohn Caterson
2025-02-16 21:31:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Johnny LaRue
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Joel
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/
So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021. OK. Great. Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks.
That is honestly very interesting. It's looking like Microsoft is
borrowing Apple's approach to support.
Good. It's about damn time. Very hard to move forward when you are still
supporting ancient hardware (and software).
And let's face it. To have any future at all, Windows desperately needs to
move forward.
Have you ever considered that an operating system could offer layers of
functionality? For example, a 286 could run Windows 3.0, but if you
wanted the enhanced features, you needed a 386. Why can't it be that way
with Windows again?
It's likely by design - planned obsolescence.
--
End Transmission
CrudeSausage
2025-02-16 23:49:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Adison Vohn Caterson
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Johnny LaRue
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Joel
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/
So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021. OK. Great. Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks.
That is honestly very interesting. It's looking like Microsoft is
borrowing Apple's approach to support.
Good. It's about damn time. Very hard to move forward when you are still
supporting ancient hardware (and software).
And let's face it. To have any future at all, Windows desperately needs to
move forward.
Have you ever considered that an operating system could offer layers of
functionality? For example, a 286 could run Windows 3.0, but if you
wanted the enhanced features, you needed a 386. Why can't it be that way
with Windows again?
It's likely by design - planned obsolescence.
I agree, but I don't see why someone who could run Windows 11 when it
was first released could not be allowed to update to the latest version
of Windows 11 because their hardware doesn't have some new functionality.
--
God be with you,

CrudeSausage/
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
John 14:6
Joel
2025-02-17 15:27:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Adison Vohn Caterson
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Johnny LaRue
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Joel
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/
So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021. OK. Great. Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks.
That is honestly very interesting. It's looking like Microsoft is
borrowing Apple's approach to support.
Good. It's about damn time. Very hard to move forward when you are still
supporting ancient hardware (and software).
And let's face it. To have any future at all, Windows desperately needs to
move forward.
Have you ever considered that an operating system could offer layers of
functionality? For example, a 286 could run Windows 3.0, but if you
wanted the enhanced features, you needed a 386. Why can't it be that way
with Windows again?
It's likely by design - planned obsolescence.
I agree, but I don't see why someone who could run Windows 11 when it
was first released could not be allowed to update to the latest version
of Windows 11 because their hardware doesn't have some new functionality.
I can still run 11 because I had it before, but you read between the
lines and see that it'd suck balls, they aren't *genuinely* supporting
older CPUs, not to have the fresh experience. Linux is the refuge.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
rbowman
2025-02-16 21:38:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Have you ever considered that an operating system could offer layers of
functionality? For example, a 286 could run Windows 3.0, but if you
wanted the enhanced features, you needed a 386. Why can't it be that way
with Windows again?
So a software company would have to maintain, build, and test several
branches, some of which would have minimal sales? No thanks.
CrudeSausage
2025-02-16 23:49:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by rbowman
Post by CrudeSausage
Have you ever considered that an operating system could offer layers of
functionality? For example, a 286 could run Windows 3.0, but if you
wanted the enhanced features, you needed a 386. Why can't it be that way
with Windows again?
So a software company would have to maintain, build, and test several
branches, some of which would have minimal sales? No thanks.
Point made. I guess those unwilling to upgrade could always fall back to
Linux.
--
God be with you,

CrudeSausage/
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
John 14:6
rbowman
2025-02-17 05:08:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by rbowman
Post by CrudeSausage
Have you ever considered that an operating system could offer layers
of functionality? For example, a 286 could run Windows 3.0, but if you
wanted the enhanced features, you needed a 386. Why can't it be that
way with Windows again?
So a software company would have to maintain, build, and test several
branches, some of which would have minimal sales? No thanks.
Point made. I guess those unwilling to upgrade could always fall back to
Linux.
Precisely. My 4th gen i5 is not a candidate for Windows 11 but it does
fine with Fedora 41. It started life as Windows 7; I don't know how far
it would have made it as a Windows box. 10?
CrudeSausage
2025-02-17 11:56:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by rbowman
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by rbowman
Post by CrudeSausage
Have you ever considered that an operating system could offer layers
of functionality? For example, a 286 could run Windows 3.0, but if you
wanted the enhanced features, you needed a 386. Why can't it be that
way with Windows again?
So a software company would have to maintain, build, and test several
branches, some of which would have minimal sales? No thanks.
Point made. I guess those unwilling to upgrade could always fall back to
Linux.
Precisely. My 4th gen i5 is not a candidate for Windows 11 but it does
fine with Fedora 41. It started life as Windows 7; I don't know how far
it would have made it as a Windows box. 10?
Well, I gave away my 4th generation i7 laptop to a guy at work. It still
ran Linux fine (minus waking from sleep), but the guy was so pitiful
(his shoes had a hole going from the front to the middle) that I figured
he'd benefit from getting something for nothing.
--
God be with you,

CrudeSausage/
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
John 14:6
Anton Shepelev
2025-02-17 16:34:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by rbowman
Post by CrudeSausage
Have you ever considered that an operating system could
offer layers of functionality? For example, a 286 could
run Windows 3.0, but if you wanted the enhanced
features, you needed a 386. Why can't it be that way
with Windows again?
So a software company would have to maintain, build, and
test several branches, some of which would have minimal
sales? No thanks.
Not at all. This kind of compatibility is not maintained in
branches, but rather in a common code base with perhaps (but
not necessarily) some platform-specific fragments govenred
by conditinal compilation. Modern technology offers many
open, stable, and well-supported standards and protocols to
make software that lasts.

A reponsible developer uses the oldest technology that suits
the task, to save the users from the upgrade treadmill. For
example, a terminal text editor may support 132x60 true-
color terminals, but it will always support the standard ISO
screen of 80x25 characters as the common denominator. It
may support Unicode, but will always support 7- and 8-bit
codepages, and so on. That way, computer can have their
natural usable lifespan of 20-25 years for the majority of
everyday tasks.

Many requirements are the result of a collusion between
hardware, OS, and software makers to force usees (as
xwidnows calls them) continuosly to pay for newer hardware,
OSes, and software -- merely too keep the PC usable.
Hackers have demonstrated that many games and some browsers
do not work on Windows XP simply because of an explicit
version test in the code, removing which lets the program
run.

This article is made in Windows XP: written in RPad32,
formatted with GNU Troff, and posted via Sylpheed.
--
() ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org -- against proprietary attachments
rbowman
2025-02-17 18:38:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Hackers have demonstrated that many games and some browsers do not work
on Windows XP simply because of an explicit version test in the code,
removing which lets the program run.
When we started developing an Android app, Android 4.0 was the latest
version. As time went on 4.0 lost market share and the app did a version
test for a minimum version to support the newer features.

My personal tablet didn't receive updates past 4.1 and would not run the
production app. However I could build my own apk with the version test
removed and it would run -- mostly. 'Mostly' isn't good enough.

I hit the same sort of problem with Esri applications. It used some of the
extended instructions that were not supported by earlier AMD Athlon
processors and would ultimately crash on those machines. Esri did not test
for the instructions so I created a small utility to do the test so our
support people wouldn't install on those machines and then have to deal
with support calls about crashing apps. Trust me, when you install third
party software on a client's system it's your fault if it doesn't work.

Sure, hackers can figure out what does or doesn't work. Commercial
software creators don't want to deal with 'maybe it will work most of the
time'.
Anton Shepelev
2025-02-20 12:16:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by rbowman
Sure, hackers can figure out what does or doesn't work.
Commercial software creators don't want to deal with
'maybe it will work most of the time'.
Then add a disclamer instead of crippling the software
because it /might not/ work on older OSes or hardware.
--
() ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org -- against proprietary attachments
Kerr-Mudd, John
2025-02-20 12:56:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:16:06 +0300
Post by Anton Shepelev
Post by rbowman
Sure, hackers can figure out what does or doesn't work.
Commercial software creators don't want to deal with
'maybe it will work most of the time'.
Then add a disclamer instead of crippling the software
because it /might not/ work on older OSes or hardware.
This is particulary bad with some "latest trendy" websites and some
Android apps, if your browser/device is not bang up-to-date, fail to
load/install.

New Version: "needs x"
Old Version: "must upgrade"

Old Version was working fine 'til then.
--
Bah, and indeed Humbug.
rbowman
2025-02-20 19:58:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by rbowman
Sure, hackers can figure out what does or doesn't work.
Commercial software creators don't want to deal with 'maybe it will
work most of the time'.
Then add a disclamer instead of crippling the software because it /might
not/ work on older OSes or hardware.
Yeah, that works so well. You can add a 30 point disclaimer that
FireAardvark may not work on Windows 8 and the users will still bitch long
and loud when it doesn't. In the rare case they submit a bug report bamboo
slivers under the fingernails will be required before they'll admit they
tried to use it on Windows 8.

I've been on both sides of the fence. When current software wouldn't
install/run on my Windows 7 box it became a Linux box.
Joel
2025-02-20 20:14:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by rbowman
When current software wouldn't
install/run on my Windows 7 box it became a Linux box.
That's what I'm talking about, my old computer could have still been
going with Linux, today, but it was just a disaster with Win10 20H2.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
Frank Slootweg
2025-02-20 20:42:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by rbowman
Post by rbowman
Sure, hackers can figure out what does or doesn't work.
Commercial software creators don't want to deal with 'maybe it will
work most of the time'.
Then add a disclamer instead of crippling the software because it /might
not/ work on older OSes or hardware.
Yeah, that works so well. You can add a 30 point disclaimer that
FireAardvark may not work on Windows 8 and the users will still bitch long
and loud when it doesn't. In the rare case they submit a bug report bamboo
slivers under the fingernails will be required before they'll admit they
tried to use it on Windows 8.
I've been on both sides of the fence. When current software wouldn't
install/run on my Windows 7 box it became a Linux box.
I think this calls for a famous quote from a newsgroup, a long, long
time ago:

Supported, known to work -> warm fuzzies all around
Supported, known to not work -> an <redacted>ite is in trouble
Unsupported, known to work -> lucky today, unlucky tomorrow?
Unsupported, not known to not work -> there but for the grace of Turing
Unsupported, known to not work -> no, it was not deliberate ;-)

[Hi Rick!]
Daniel70
2025-02-21 10:24:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
<Snip>
Post by Frank Slootweg
Post by rbowman
I've been on both sides of the fence. When current software wouldn't
install/run on my Windows 7 box it became a Linux box.
I think this calls for a famous quote from a newsgroup, a long, long
Supported, known to work -> warm fuzzies all around
Supported, known to not work -> an <redacted>ite is in trouble
Unsupported, known to work -> lucky today, unlucky tomorrow?
Unsupported, not known to not work -> there but for the grace of Turing
Unsupported, known to not work -> no, it was not deliberate ;-)
[Hi Rick!]
Hmmm! Is that, sort of, like Iraq War??

There are Known Knowns.
There are Known Unknowns.
There are Unknown Knows, and,
There are Unknown Unknows!!
c. Early 1990, so GW Bush Snr or his Defence Boss. ;-P
--
Daniel70
Joel
2025-02-21 13:26:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Daniel70
Post by Frank Slootweg
Post by rbowman
I've been on both sides of the fence. When current software wouldn't
install/run on my Windows 7 box it became a Linux box.
I think this calls for a famous quote from a newsgroup, a long, long
Supported, known to work -> warm fuzzies all around
Supported, known to not work -> an <redacted>ite is in trouble
Unsupported, known to work -> lucky today, unlucky tomorrow?
Unsupported, not known to not work -> there but for the grace of Turing
Unsupported, known to not work -> no, it was not deliberate ;-)
[Hi Rick!]
Hmmm! Is that, sort of, like Iraq War??
There are Known Knowns.
There are Known Unknowns.
There are Unknown Knows, and,
There are Unknown Unknows!!
c. Early 1990, so GW Bush Snr or his Defence Boss. ;-P
That was in 2003 or later, Sec. Rumsfeld regarding the invasion of
Iraq under GWB, not the elder Pres. Bush in the '90s.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
Frank Slootweg
2025-02-21 16:45:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Daniel70
<Snip>
Post by Frank Slootweg
Post by rbowman
I've been on both sides of the fence. When current software wouldn't
install/run on my Windows 7 box it became a Linux box.
I think this calls for a famous quote from a newsgroup, a long, long
Supported, known to work -> warm fuzzies all around
Supported, known to not work -> an <redacted>ite is in trouble
Unsupported, known to work -> lucky today, unlucky tomorrow?
Unsupported, not known to not work -> there but for the grace of Turing
Unsupported, known to not work -> no, it was not deliberate ;-)
[Hi Rick!]
Hmmm! Is that, sort of, like Iraq War??
There are Known Knowns.
There are Known Unknowns.
There are Unknown Knows, and,
There are Unknown Unknows!!
c. Early 1990, so GW Bush Snr or his Defence Boss. ;-P
Could be. Perhaps the author was inspired by it, but I doubt it,
because it's a totally different subject matter.

BTW, Wikipedia says the 1990-1991 war was the 'Gulf War' and
'Operation Desert Storm' or, later, referred by some as the 'First Iraq
War'.

I looked it up, because to me, the 'Iraq War' is the 2003 one.
Wikipedia agrees with me and so they should! :-)

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War_(disambiguation)>
Kerr-Mudd, John
2025-02-17 19:06:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 19:34:14 +0300
Post by Anton Shepelev
Post by rbowman
Post by CrudeSausage
Have you ever considered that an operating system could
offer layers of functionality? For example, a 286 could
run Windows 3.0, but if you wanted the enhanced
features, you needed a 386. Why can't it be that way
with Windows again?
So a software company would have to maintain, build, and
test several branches, some of which would have minimal
sales? No thanks.
Not at all. This kind of compatibility is not maintained in
branches, but rather in a common code base with perhaps (but
not necessarily) some platform-specific fragments govenred
by conditinal compilation. Modern technology offers many
open, stable, and well-supported standards and protocols to
make software that lasts.
A reponsible developer uses the oldest technology that suits
the task, to save the users from the upgrade treadmill. For
example, a terminal text editor may support 132x60 true-
color terminals, but it will always support the standard ISO
screen of 80x25 characters as the common denominator. It
may support Unicode, but will always support 7- and 8-bit
codepages, and so on. That way, computer can have their
natural usable lifespan of 20-25 years for the majority of
everyday tasks.
Many requirements are the result of a collusion between
hardware, OS, and software makers to force usees (as
xwidnows calls them) continuosly to pay for newer hardware,
OSes, and software -- merely too keep the PC usable.
Hackers have demonstrated that many games and some browsers
do not work on Windows XP simply because of an explicit
version test in the code, removing which lets the program
run.
This article is made in Windows XP: written in RPad32,
nearly 400k for a mere notepad treplacement ?! - ah maybe cyrillic support
takes it there.
Post by Anton Shepelev
formatted with GNU Troff,
formatting? feh, a few linewraps is easy.
Post by Anton Shepelev
and posted via Sylpheed.
That's a good choice.
--
Bah, and indeed Humbug.
Anton Shepelev
2025-02-20 12:11:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
This article is made in Windows XP: written in
RPad32,
nearly 400k for a mere notepad treplacement ?!
- ah maybe cyrillic support takes it there.
It has lots of nifty features in addition to suport-
ing the five main Cyrilic encodings, but none of
those seem to justify the size, which may be due to
the reliance on some third-party rich-text compo-
nent. I never cared.
Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
formatted with GNU Troff,
formatting? feh, a few linewraps is easy.
Sometimes I also use autonumbered lists, tables,
display environments, footnotes, headers, justifica-
tion and hyphenation (here), &c. I typeset the
CoreOps newsletter in nroff:

https://corewar.co.uk/coreops/coreops02.txt

Otherwise, Vim's "gq" formatter or a similar exter-
nal utility usually does the job.
--
() ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org -- against proprietary attachments
Kerr-Mudd, John
2025-02-20 12:51:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:11:23 +0300
Post by Anton Shepelev
This article is made in Windows XP: written in
RPad32,
[snip fair comment about apps]
Post by Anton Shepelev
https://corewar.co.uk/coreops/coreops02.txt
Golly, that's a blast from the past; I recall seeing CW in the early 80's;
but I never did get into it enough to create any warriors.
[]
--
Bah, and indeed Humbug.
Anton Shepelev
2025-02-20 14:18:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
Post by Anton Shepelev
https://corewar.co.uk/coreops/coreops02.txt
Golly, that's a blast from the past; I recall seeing CW in
the early 80's; but I never did get into it enough to
create any warriors.
Nor did I, but this friend of mine has become one of the best
contemporary CoreWar masters. I have, however, written some
non-warrior CoreWar programs in a competition, but I did not
win anything because no one else was crazy enough to write
utilities in Corewar... It is some 15 years ago, when it was
going strong.
--
() ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org -- against proprietary attachments
Anton Shepelev
2025-02-20 12:13:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
Post by Anton Shepelev
and posted via Sylpheed.
That's a good choice.
Good indeed, even though it has been unmaintained for quite
some time.
--
() ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org -- against proprietary attachments
Daniel70
2025-02-18 10:40:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by rbowman
Post by CrudeSausage
Have you ever considered that an operating system could offer layers of
functionality? For example, a 286 could run Windows 3.0, but if you
wanted the enhanced features, you needed a 386. Why can't it be that way
with Windows again?
So a software company would have to maintain, build, and test several
branches, some of which would have minimal sales? No thanks.
And then you get to 'Pentium' v '586'!! Similar but not the same!!
--
Daniel70
Chris
2025-02-17 08:23:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Johnny LaRue
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Joel
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/
So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021. OK. Great. Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks.
That is honestly very interesting. It's looking like Microsoft is
borrowing Apple's approach to support.
Good. It's about damn time. Very hard to move forward when you are still
supporting ancient hardware (and software).
And let's face it. To have any future at all, Windows desperately needs to
move forward.
Have you ever considered that an operating system could offer layers of
functionality? For example, a 286 could run Windows 3.0, but if you
wanted the enhanced features, you needed a 386. Why can't it be that way
with Windows again?
Because judging the tech market by 30 year old standards is daft. Windows
11 has nothing in common with Windows 3.0.
CrudeSausage
2025-02-17 12:15:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Chris
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Johnny LaRue
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Joel
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/
So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021. OK. Great. Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks.
That is honestly very interesting. It's looking like Microsoft is
borrowing Apple's approach to support.
Good. It's about damn time. Very hard to move forward when you are still
supporting ancient hardware (and software).
And let's face it. To have any future at all, Windows desperately needs to
move forward.
Have you ever considered that an operating system could offer layers of
functionality? For example, a 286 could run Windows 3.0, but if you
wanted the enhanced features, you needed a 386. Why can't it be that way
with Windows again?
Because judging the tech market by 30 year old standards is daft. Windows
11 has nothing in common with Windows 3.0.
Yes, but it can easily make itself available to lower-end machines by
turning off some graphical features which are enabled by default and
some security features which aren't supported on older machines. The
core of Windows 11 should run on machines from the 2006-2007 era, it
just won't.
--
God be with you,

CrudeSausage/
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
John 14:6
Chris
2025-02-17 17:50:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Chris
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Johnny LaRue
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Joel
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/
So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021. OK. Great. Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks.
That is honestly very interesting. It's looking like Microsoft is
borrowing Apple's approach to support.
Good. It's about damn time. Very hard to move forward when you are still
supporting ancient hardware (and software).
And let's face it. To have any future at all, Windows desperately needs to
move forward.
Have you ever considered that an operating system could offer layers of
functionality? For example, a 286 could run Windows 3.0, but if you
wanted the enhanced features, you needed a 386. Why can't it be that way
with Windows again?
Because judging the tech market by 30 year old standards is daft. Windows
11 has nothing in common with Windows 3.0.
Yes, but it can easily make itself available to lower-end machines by
turning off some graphical features which are enabled by default and
some security features which aren't supported on older machines.
Given the significant risks of cyber threats no-one is going to advocate
for removing security features.
Post by CrudeSausage
The
core of Windows 11 should run on machines from the 2006-2007 era, it
just won't.
Are you a developer with intimate knowledge of the inner workings of
Windows? Windows doesn't work that way mostly for marketing reasons.

What you're looking for is linux, that way -->
CrudeSausage
2025-02-17 19:35:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Chris
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Chris
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Johnny LaRue
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Joel
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/
So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021. OK. Great. Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks.
That is honestly very interesting. It's looking like Microsoft is
borrowing Apple's approach to support.
Good. It's about damn time. Very hard to move forward when you are still
supporting ancient hardware (and software).
And let's face it. To have any future at all, Windows desperately needs to
move forward.
Have you ever considered that an operating system could offer layers of
functionality? For example, a 286 could run Windows 3.0, but if you
wanted the enhanced features, you needed a 386. Why can't it be that way
with Windows again?
Because judging the tech market by 30 year old standards is daft. Windows
11 has nothing in common with Windows 3.0.
Yes, but it can easily make itself available to lower-end machines by
turning off some graphical features which are enabled by default and
some security features which aren't supported on older machines.
Given the significant risks of cyber threats no-one is going to advocate
for removing security features.
Not removing; not enabling. Not everyone needs Bitlocker encryption, for
example. Not everyone will need Smart App Control. Let that kind of
functionality be optional and for more advanced computers.
Post by Chris
Post by CrudeSausage
The
core of Windows 11 should run on machines from the 2006-2007 era, it
just won't.
Are you a developer with intimate knowledge of the inner workings of
Windows? Windows doesn't work that way mostly for marketing reasons.
What you're looking for is linux, that way -->
Linux, you say? Is that the name of Atari's new video game console?
--
God be with you,

CrudeSausage/
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
John 14:6
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2025-02-21 00:19:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Chris
Are you a developer with intimate knowledge of the inner workings of
Windows? Windows doesn't work that way mostly for marketing reasons.
Nobody knows how Windows works, not even Microsoft’s own engineers.

Who in the world, inside or outside of Microsoft, can answer yes to the
first question? Nobody.
CrudeSausage
2025-02-21 00:32:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Chris
Are you a developer with intimate knowledge of the inner workings of
Windows? Windows doesn't work that way mostly for marketing reasons.
Nobody knows how Windows works, not even Microsoft’s own engineers.
Who in the world, inside or outside of Microsoft, can answer yes to the
first question? Nobody.
I would be surprised about this considering how they rewrote most of it
in the mid-2000s.
--
God be with you,

CrudeSausage
John 14:6
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2025-02-21 01:29:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Chris
Are you a developer with intimate knowledge of the inner workings of
Windows? Windows doesn't work that way mostly for marketing reasons.
Nobody knows how Windows works, not even Microsoft’s own engineers.
Who in the world, inside or outside of Microsoft, can answer yes to the
first question? Nobody.
I would be surprised about this considering how they rewrote most of it
in the mid-2000s.
They tried to. Remember “Longhorn”, which became Windows Vista? They were
promising a whole bunch of new major technologies, none of which
eventually shipped. Remember why it was so late? Because somebody had the
bright idea of writing core parts of it in Dotnet. Which turned out to be
a really bad idea. So the infamous “Longhorn Reset” involved chucking out
and replacing all that Dotnet code. And even with the delay, they still
had to rush to get it out. Hence all the bugs and inefficiencies and
instabilities and other trouble.

Why does Windows need to reboot about 5 times during an install? Because
nobody at Microsoft knows to reliably shut down and restart their own
services, so it’s easier just to reboot everything.
CrudeSausage
2025-02-21 13:35:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Chris
Are you a developer with intimate knowledge of the inner workings of
Windows? Windows doesn't work that way mostly for marketing reasons.
Nobody knows how Windows works, not even Microsoft’s own engineers.
Who in the world, inside or outside of Microsoft, can answer yes to the
first question? Nobody.
I would be surprised about this considering how they rewrote most of it
in the mid-2000s.
They tried to. Remember “Longhorn”, which became Windows Vista? They were
promising a whole bunch of new major technologies, none of which
eventually shipped. Remember why it was so late? Because somebody had the
bright idea of writing core parts of it in Dotnet. Which turned out to be
a really bad idea. So the infamous “Longhorn Reset” involved chucking out
and replacing all that Dotnet code. And even with the delay, they still
had to rush to get it out. Hence all the bugs and inefficiencies and
instabilities and other trouble.
Why does Windows need to reboot about 5 times during an install? Because
nobody at Microsoft knows to reliably shut down and restart their own
services, so it’s easier just to reboot everything.
That could be true. I was part of the beta-testing experience back then
(my friend from high school ended up working at Microsoft and sent me an
invite), and I can honestly say that the product was a complete mess
during the time that we tested it. Finding bugs was trivial. I found a
bunch and they rewarded me with a product key for Windows Vista Ultimate
for my efforts. I was surprised that it was ever released to
manufacturers though.

Beta-testing 7 was a different story. There were bugs, but they were a
lot harder to find. Even in beta, it was a superior product to the
finished Vista.
--
God be with you,

CrudeSausage
John 14:6
Paul
2025-02-21 18:11:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Chris
Are you a developer with intimate knowledge of the inner workings of
Windows? Windows doesn't work that way mostly for marketing reasons.
Nobody knows how Windows works, not even Microsoft’s own engineers.
Who in the world, inside or outside of Microsoft, can answer yes to the
first question? Nobody.
I would be surprised about this considering how they rewrote most of it
in the mid-2000s.
They tried to. Remember “Longhorn”, which became Windows Vista? They were
promising a whole bunch of new major technologies, none of which
eventually shipped. Remember why it was so late? Because somebody had the
bright idea of writing core parts of it in Dotnet. Which turned out to be
a really bad idea. So the infamous “Longhorn Reset” involved chucking out
and replacing all that Dotnet code. And even with the delay, they still
had to rush to get it out. Hence all the bugs and inefficiencies and
instabilities and other trouble.
Why does Windows need to reboot about 5 times during an install? Because
nobody at Microsoft knows to reliably shut down and restart their own
services, so it’s easier just to reboot everything.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-client/setup-upgrade-and-drivers/windows-10-upgrade-issues-troubleshooting

1) Downlevel phase: ... this phase runs on the source OS <=== can pop the DVD or .ISO after this reboots
The OS may download patches for Windows Update materials or similar.
the installer may restart itself (no reboot) after patched.
[This is the "media copy" phase. Decompression of install.wim happens here.]



2) SafeOS phase: ...computer is booted into Windows PE during the SafeOS phase
Now the computer has a known good OS, to continue the installation process
The logfiles go in a different place now. There will be Windows and Windows.old .
The datestamps on (1), versus (2),(3),(4), one uses local time, the other
uses UTC.

3) First boot phase: ...failures... almost exclusively caused by device drivers.

4) Second boot phase: ... system ... running ... target OS.

and somewhere in there, is the "Migration phase", where programs are reinstalled
one by one. For example, when I Repair Installed a Win10 on the Test Machine
yesterday, and walked away, when I came back the screen was open, and the Logitech
webcam install program was asking for EReg (registration information). I could not
tell if the Repair Install had finished or it had bombed out (as the version of
the OS does not change during a Repair). I removed the Logitech package, and
re-ran the Repair Install, and it finished pretty quickly the second time. It
likely did not roll back after all (from the first attempt).

This is why there is a folder full of .msi files . It is used for program removal
normally, but also serves as the base for program reinstall on a Repair Install.

The Windows.old file is not as it seems. It is more than a Windows file, and
it contains all the materials needed during a rollback. Including some kind
of Program Files content. That is just in case you have some weird idea of
"renaming folders" and pretending it is the old system. Don't do that :-)
That stuff is there for a reason, it can be used for a reversion request by
the user, and the materials are erased on their own after ten days have elapsed.
You don't need to use CleanMgr.exe to remove Windows.old properly. *Do not* use
the Trash Bin for removal either. There is a command line sequence which
it is claimed, can do the removal (a little icacls magic I would assume). On
one occasion, some invalid characters were in a couple of places in Windows.old,
and then the command line method is going to fail.

The https://learn.microsoft.com site has the technical contents. One of the
problems, is getting the Google search syntax "just right" to get the most
topical page from that site. It took me around eight tries to get the above link.
The wrong keywords, will leave you showered in junk.

IT people have to be familiar with WADK, DISM and Sysprep and building reference OS
images for Enterprise setups. Then mass deployment of image to thousands of
machines. A lot of the educational materials are there to help the IT people.

Paul
Frank Slootweg
2025-02-21 18:46:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
[...]
Post by Paul
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Why does Windows need to reboot about 5 times during an install? Because
nobody at Microsoft knows to reliably shut down and restart their own
services, so it?s easier just to reboot everything.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-client/setup-upgrade-and-drivers/windows-10-upgrade-issues-troubleshooting
[Lots deleted.]

I think the answer to Lawrence's claim got lost in your elaborate
details.

So *how many* reboots are there actually during an install?

I haven't experienced anything over only *two*, for Windows 10.
Windows 11 was only one, but that was an 'install' from a new preloaded
laptop, so probably more a 'setup' than an install.

Anyway, two is quite a bit less than Lawrence's "about 5 times".

Not that a few reboots during an *install* are anything to get one's
knickers in a twist, but apparently some knickers get twisted rather
easily.
Paul
2025-02-21 22:32:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Frank Slootweg
[...]
Post by Paul
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Why does Windows need to reboot about 5 times during an install? Because
nobody at Microsoft knows to reliably shut down and restart their own
services, so it?s easier just to reboot everything.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-client/setup-upgrade-and-drivers/windows-10-upgrade-issues-troubleshooting
[Lots deleted.]
I think the answer to Lawrence's claim got lost in your elaborate
details.
So *how many* reboots are there actually during an install?
I haven't experienced anything over only *two*, for Windows 10.
Windows 11 was only one, but that was an 'install' from a new preloaded
laptop, so probably more a 'setup' than an install.
Anyway, two is quite a bit less than Lawrence's "about 5 times".
Not that a few reboots during an *install* are anything to get one's
knickers in a twist, but apparently some knickers get twisted rather
easily.
I haven't sat around counting them, but I do know that
on some installs I've done here, I had to be present to
set the boot to the correct device during the install.
The boot management hasn't always been overloaded with
the correct setting so you could, for example, walk away.

On one occasion, I walked away, and one of the other OSes
on the machine had booted, and the install was only
partially finished at that point. On rebooting and selecting
the entry which was the thing being installed, the install
picked up again without any problem.

You might have more of a problem like that, if you are
multibooting. Most of my drives here have more than one OS.

It helps if you set the Windows Boot Manager "default" partition
to the one receiving the installation, as then the automatic
selection will be set to the thing needing the attention.
(This would be for a Repair or Upgrade install.)

*******

I asked CoPilot the question, since Google search is not helping.

<Me>

What percentage values show during the various phases of a
Windows 10 or Windows 11 installation procedure ?

<CoPilot>

During the installation of Windows 10 and Windows 11, the percentage values
displayed on the screen represent the progress of different phases. Here’s
a general breakdown of what happens at various percentage points:

### Windows 10 Installation Phases:
1. **0% - 30%**: Initial setup and copying files.
2. **30% - 50%**: Installing features and drivers.
3. **50% - 75%**: Configuring settings and preparing files.
4. **75% - 100%**: Finalizing installation and completing setup.

### Windows 11 Installation Phases:
1. **0% - 30%**: Compatibility checks and initial setup.
2. **30% - 60%**: Copying files and installing features.
3. **60% - 90%**: Installing drivers and configuring settings.
4. **90% - 100%**: Finalizing installation and completing setup.

*******

And that suggests four reboots, as an approximate number.
If the Migration phase is null (like on a Clean Install),
I don't know how that is represented by the percentages
or the reboot behaviors.

Paul
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2025-02-21 21:33:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Paul
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Why does Windows need to reboot about 5 times during an install?
Because nobody at Microsoft knows to reliably shut down and restart
their own services, so it’s easier just to reboot everything.
...
2) SafeOS phase: ...computer is booted into Windows PE during the SafeOS phase
Now the computer has a known good OS, to
continue the installation process
Here’s something else that wasn’t mentioned: on Windows, the running
processes keep open files locked, so they cannot be upgraded. Switching to
a minimal boot kernel isn’t so much about being “known good” as it is
about avoiding locks on files that need to be upgraded.
Post by Paul
The logfiles go in a different place now.
Why? So that locks on files in that “different place” don’t matter for
upgrading the regular OS.
Post by Paul
and somewhere in there, is the "Migration phase", where programs are
reinstalled one by one.
Wonder why this is even necessary. A Linux distro can upgrade itself in-
place, without touching third-party stuff in /usr/local or /opt.
Paul
2025-02-22 10:49:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Paul
and somewhere in there, is the "Migration phase", where programs are
reinstalled one by one.
Wonder why this is even necessary. A Linux distro can upgrade itself in-
place, without touching third-party stuff in /usr/local or /opt.
The appcompat knows a lot about well-known programs
and their needs. And can configure things for you.

Executable files have a compatibility setting in the Properties
of the file. You can tell it to "assume a WinXP environment", and
the OS can adjust the resources the program sees, so it looks like
Windows XP. For example, you can run Audacity, and offer it OpenAL
(no compat setting) or a previous audio subsystem if you set the
value to an earlier OS. The names of the audio inputs and outputs
change when you do this.

The appcompat can do that by itself. The user can adjust the menu value
as they see fit, if they think some other value is better.

In a Linux upgrade, all the package versions and their dependencies
are upgraded, so it's a forklift change where the existing packages
guide what items are updated immediately. Maybe the old version
of program used GTK2, the new version uses GTK3.

Part of a Linux upgrade, is removing some customizations known to
break an upgrade attempt. On Linux, you *back up* before an Upgrade
attempt. If Linux becomes wobbly, don't fret, restore from backup
and try again, like after you evaluate whether any PPA you added
could be responsible.

The Windows installer explicitly looks for blockers. For
example, I had one Windows Upgrade denied because "your VirtualBox
is not compatible with the new OS". Removing VBox 5 and
installing VBox 6, shuts up the message and the
check before the install starts, is satiated. But a
lot of other stuff is handled by AppCompat and installing
things using the .msi collection stored in C: . If you were upgrading
a Win7 Pro with WinXP mode to Win10, you would likely be told
that Virtual PC is not compatible with the OS, and the user then
removes WinXP Mode (supported by a Virtual PC install) from the
playing field and the Upgrade goes ahead. Anything virtualization
related, stands a chance of being an issue, unless the installer
logic finds the item is OK.

The Windows Installer doesn't know everything. It should have known
my video card was too old, but it does not attempt to resolve driver
dependencies early on. My Upgrade attempt rolled back, and on a
hunch, I installed another video card (desktop) to replace
the GMA4500 iGPU and the Upgrade finished on the second try.
There was no message on the screen that was the issue, it just
rolled back and that was it. I was supposed to "read logfiles
and figure it out for myself". I put in a sufficiently modern
card (WDDM 1.1 driver available) and took my chances without
reading any logs. That's because I'd read somewhere on the web,
that the particular Upgrade did not support XDDM driver cards.
We had been warned on previous occasions that support would
not last forever on XDDM (presumably, a WinXP era driver).

Paul
Paul
2025-02-21 13:10:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Chris
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Joel
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/
So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021.  OK.  Great.  Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks.
That is honestly very interesting. It's looking like Microsoft is
borrowing Apple's approach to support.
Good. It's about damn time.  Very hard to move forward when you are still
supporting ancient hardware (and software).
And let's face it.  To have any future at all, Windows desperately needs to
move forward.
Have you ever considered that an operating system could offer layers of
functionality? For example, a 286 could run Windows 3.0, but if you
wanted the enhanced features, you needed a 386. Why can't it be that way
with Windows again?
Because judging the tech market by 30 year old standards is daft. Windows
11 has nothing in common with Windows 3.0.
Yes, but it can easily make itself available to lower-end machines by turning off some graphical features which are enabled by default and some security features which aren't supported on older machines. The core of Windows 11 should run on machines from the 2006-2007 era, it just won't.
The truth of the matter is, 400,000,000 computers are going to the
landfill, and there's nothing we can do to stop it.

Even throwing them out is going to be a problem. The recycling plants
don't have the capacity for something like that. There will be a very
large pile out back of the shredding plant. Anything which requires manual
labor (remove mobo from desktop case) times 400,000,000 is "a lot of hours".

*******

Here are some breadcrumbs.

CMPXCHG16b requirement only applies to the 64-bit installation of Windows 8.1;
the 32-bit version should work just fine on your machine.

CMPXCHG16b, PrefetchW, and LAHF/SAHF

SSE2, PAE, NX

SSE4.2 POPCNT, plus the vanilla (single operand) POPCNT

Some applications also have at least an SSE2 requirement
(could be used as an equivalent to the MOVEM on a 68K processor).
That might have been a browser (all platforms) needing SSE2.

The labeling of the features varies a bit in utilities.

https://superuser.com/questions/931742/windows-10-64-bit-requirements-does-my-cpu-support-cmpxchg16b-prefetchw-and-la

LAHF-SAHF - Supports LAHF/SAHF instructions in 64-bit mode
NX - Supports no-execute page protection
CX16 * Supports CMPXCHG16B instruction
X64 * Supports 64-bit mode
PREFETCHW - Supports PREFETCHW instruction

Graphics are DX9, DX11, DX12, DX12 Ultimate, sorted into driver
versions XDDM and WDDM 1.1 thru 3.4 . Win10 22H2 requires min WDDM 1.1.
A HD6450 is WDDM 1.1 (it got only one WDDM driver). The 7900GT crashes
on Linux, runs on Windows 10. As example of "adventures for the unwary".
It's because of this and various secure boot messes (shim signing),
the industry has set this up such that "it takes too many hours
of maintenance to wrestle this stuff from the landfill". The industry
has won, with their stupid little tricks. Even Wayland plays a part
(follow the money). Wayland is the superfluous third tit.

Paul
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2025-02-20 21:56:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Windows 11 has nothing in common with Windows 3.0.
Oh, it has plenty in common. Drive letters, default extensions for finding
executables, crap .BAT files, “reserved” file names (anybody know what
they are?), tendency to become flaky over time, difficulties with multi-
tasking ...

And that’s just off the top of my head.
Mark Lloyd
2025-02-21 18:15:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Windows 11 has nothing in common with Windows 3.0.
Oh, it has plenty in common. Drive letters, default extensions for
finding executables, crap .BAT files, “reserved” file names (anybody
know what they are?), tendency to become flaky over time, difficulties
with multi- tasking ...
And that’s just off the top of my head.
How about the "hide known file extensions" feature that makes it easier
for malware writers? Where an EXE file called "help.txt.exe" can look like
a harmless text file.
--
Mark Lloyd
http://notstupid.us/

"Error! No keyboard detected. Press F1 to continue."
DFS
2025-02-21 19:42:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mark Lloyd
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Windows 11 has nothing in common with Windows 3.0.
Oh, it has plenty in common. Drive letters, default extensions for
finding executables, crap .BAT files, “reserved” file names (anybody
know what they are?), tendency to become flaky over time, difficulties
with multi- tasking ...
And that’s just off the top of my head.
How about the "hide known file extensions" feature that makes it easier
for malware writers? Where an EXE file called "help.txt.exe" can look like
a harmless text file.
http://notstupid.us/include/picviewer.php/graphics/mark?desc=picture+of+me

Seriously?

You look like you ate 100 distros for lunch.
Joel
2025-02-17 15:23:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Johnny LaRue
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Joel
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/
So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021. OK. Great. Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks.
That is honestly very interesting. It's looking like Microsoft is
borrowing Apple's approach to support.
Good. It's about damn time. Very hard to move forward when you are still
supporting ancient hardware (and software).
And let's face it. To have any future at all, Windows desperately needs to
move forward.
Post by CrudeSausage
I suppose that I should be
expecting my own processor to be unsupported with a future release.
See above.
You have no problem replacing your computer every few years? No
wonder you use a Mac, heh.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
Anton Shepelev
2025-02-17 16:40:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Johnny LaRue
Post by CrudeSausage
That is honestly very interesting. It's looking like
Microsoft is borrowing Apple's approach to support.
Good. It's about damn time. Very hard to move forward
when you are still supporting ancient hardware (and
software).
And let's face it. To have any future at all, Windows
desperately needs to move forward.
Progress for the sake of progress is meaningless. Progress
shall serve the benefit of the end user, e.g. by helping
them use their computer, OS, and software without the
incessand upgrade treadmill, unless they need some
functionality that cannot be implemented on their hardware
for technical -- rather than capitalistic -- reasons.
--
() ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org -- against proprietary attachments
Kerr-Mudd, John
2025-02-17 18:59:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 19:40:12 +0300
Post by Anton Shepelev
Post by Johnny LaRue
Post by CrudeSausage
That is honestly very interesting. It's looking like
Microsoft is borrowing Apple's approach to support.
Good. It's about damn time. Very hard to move forward
when you are still supporting ancient hardware (and
software).
And let's face it. To have any future at all, Windows
desperately needs to move forward.
Progress for the sake of progress is meaningless. Progress
shall serve the benefit of the end user, e.g. by helping
them use their computer, OS, and software without the
incessand upgrade treadmill, unless they need some
functionality that cannot be implemented on their hardware
for technical -- rather than capitalistic -- reasons.
Feh. It's a well-known business model; FWSE: 'built-in obscelence'.
I do /not/ need extra spyware or AI bots, Thanks.
--
Bah, and indeed Humbug.
Anton Shepelev
2025-02-20 11:59:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
Post by Anton Shepelev
Progress for the sake of progress is meaningless.
Progress shall serve the benefit of the end user, e.g.
by helping them use their computer, OS, and software
without the incessand upgrade treadmill, unless they
need some functionality that cannot be implemented on
their hardware for technical -- rather than capitalistic
-- reasons.
Feh.
feg is a good image viewer.
Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
It's a well-known business model; FWSE: 'built-in
obscelence'. I do /not/ need extra spyware or AI bots,
Thanks.
Why the /thanks/? I did not offer aught of the above.
--
() ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org -- against proprietary attachments
Chris Ahlstrom
2025-02-20 12:18:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Anton Shepelev
Post by Anton Shepelev
Progress for the sake of progress is meaningless.
Progress shall serve the benefit of the end user, e.g.
by helping them use their computer, OS, and software
without the incessand upgrade treadmill, unless they
need some functionality that cannot be implemented on
their hardware for technical -- rather than capitalistic
-- reasons.
Feh.
feg is a good image viewer.
Here's how I use feh to splat different random wallpapers on each monitor:

feh --bg-scale --randomize --recursive ~/.local/wallpapers/ &

It's in my .xsession and also mapped (in Fluxbox) to the Super-Z key combo.

I notice feh is still getting updates (in Debian Sid).
--
If I were a grave-digger or even a hangman, there are some people I could
work for with a great deal of enjoyment.
-- Douglas Jerrold
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2025-02-20 21:25:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Anton Shepelev
Post by Johnny LaRue
And let's face it. To have any future at all, Windows desperately
needs to move forward.
Progress for the sake of progress is meaningless.
Particularly when most of what seems to be called “progress” these days
(at least in the proprietary world) seems to be about promotion of new GUI
fashions.
rbowman
2025-02-21 02:11:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Anton Shepelev
Post by Johnny LaRue
And let's face it. To have any future at all, Windows desperately
needs to move forward.
Progress for the sake of progress is meaningless.
Particularly when most of what seems to be called “progress” these days
(at least in the proprietary world) seems to be about promotion of new
GUI fashions.
Like the women's fashion industry the new Guis are what was popular 10
years ago. Are we past flat and back to skeuomorphic yet?
Kerr-Mudd, John
2025-02-21 07:48:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On 21 Feb 2025 02:11:58 GMT
Post by rbowman
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Anton Shepelev
Post by Johnny LaRue
And let's face it. To have any future at all, Windows desperately
needs to move forward.
Progress for the sake of progress is meaningless.
Particularly when most of what seems to be called “progress” these days
(at least in the proprietary world) seems to be about promotion of new
GUI fashions.
Like the women's fashion industry the new Guis are what was popular 10
years ago. Are we past flat and back to skeuomorphic yet?
semi-transparent is like so cool!
--
Bah, and indeed Humbug.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2025-02-21 21:35:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Particularly when most of what seems to be called “progress” these
days (at least in the proprietary world) seems to be about promotion
of new GUI fashions.
semi-transparent is like so cool!
I do like my 3D effects. But Microsoft doesn’t seem too keen on them any
more. Absolutely nothing to do with the fact that Linux GUIs can implement
them more efficiently, and on lower-spec hardware, than Windows was ever
able to manage, oh no!
Paul
2025-02-22 15:26:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Particularly when most of what seems to be called “progress” these
days (at least in the proprietary world) seems to be about promotion
of new GUI fashions.
semi-transparent is like so cool!
I do like my 3D effects. But Microsoft doesn’t seem too keen on them any
more. Absolutely nothing to do with the fact that Linux GUIs can implement
them more efficiently, and on lower-spec hardware, than Windows was ever
able to manage, oh no!
Windows has animation effects, but it is not Compiz level.
There are no fireworks or screen shimmer effects. (Modern Compiz
is just compositing.)

If you have ever watched a video card trigger the Watchdog,
and the screen has stopped updating while this has happened,
you will see that the simplest of things, are being faded in and
out, and you can catch the GUI between states, with half of one image
and half of the other, signaling a transition is taking place.

sysdm.cpl : Advanced : Performance (Settings) : Visual Effects

the Custom settings there, allow you to turn off most of the
buttery smooth stuff, in the interests of reducing the
overhead needed to do a job. If you were, for example,
stuck with the Microsoft Basic Display Adapter (no driver
is otherwise available for the card, it is the VESA driver),
running all those effects emulated, on the CPU, would be wasteful.

Paul

Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2025-02-20 21:23:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Very hard to move forward when you are still supporting ancient hardware
(and software).
Linux seems to do a better job of the ancient-hardware bit. And it manages
it with a fraction of the resources available to Microsoft.
CrudeSausage
2025-02-20 22:04:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Very hard to move forward when you are still supporting ancient hardware
(and software).
Linux seems to do a better job of the ancient-hardware bit. And it manages
it with a fraction of the resources available to Microsoft.
Linux's existence is what caused me to be confident that I can make use
of the 2017 MacBook Air I just bought for $150. With MacOS, it probably
won't go far; with Linux, it will be a perfectly usable machine that I
can keep at work. I already invested in screwdrivers, an SSD adapter and
a DisplayPort-to-HDMI adapter to make it even better and potentially use
it all the way to the next decade.
--
God be with you,

CrudeSausage
John 14:6
Joel
2025-02-17 15:13:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CrudeSausage
Post by Joel
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/
So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021. OK. Great. Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks.
That is honestly very interesting. It's looking like Microsoft is
borrowing Apple's approach to support. I suppose that I should be
expecting my own processor to be unsupported with a future release.
Yeah, it's like "oh don't worry, you already had Win11, you're good",
but yet there's this less-than-subtle implication that the product has
moved on from my hardware - which is why I had already switched to
Linux, and won't be turning back.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
chrisv
2025-02-16 14:02:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Joel
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/
So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021. OK. Great. Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks.
It won't be long before those evil bastards require that your computer
have a "neural processing unit" that can scan all your files and
report what it finds.

Better yet, if they achieve their goal of taking a screen capture
every five seconds. They will know what you're up to, at all times!
Nothing wrong with that, right?
--
"In a world in which MS Windows exists, there is literally NO REASON
to run Linux on your desktop." - some dumb fsck
Joel
2025-02-17 15:15:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by chrisv
Post by Joel
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/
So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021. OK. Great. Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks.
It won't be long before those evil bastards require that your computer
have a "neural processing unit" that can scan all your files and
report what it finds.
Better yet, if they achieve their goal of taking a screen capture
every five seconds. They will know what you're up to, at all times!
Nothing wrong with that, right?
As my old friend from school who we're still friends now would say,
they can keep Win11.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
Paul
2025-02-16 17:40:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Joel
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/
So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021. OK. Great. Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks.
Official support means, if you raise a bug that "my 8th gen Intel can't play Solitaire",
the support people at Microsoft can ignore you.

Whereas, instead of that extreme example, you're just using the thing at
home, your browser still runs, you're totally unaware of any such statements.

The only thing that won't run for sure right now, is if you boot
W11 24H2 on an E8400 Core2Duo, it's going to *crash* because it
does not have a SSE4.2 POPCNT instruction. There is nothing on
Rufus to help bypass the requirement. The MSFT installer checks whether
POPCNT support is present. That's an example of an "absolute prohibition".
I can tell people with confidence, that trying to install W11 on their
Optiplex 780, that's going to be blocked no matter what. Just as easily
as an attempt to install on a P4 or on an AthlonXP 3200 is going to be blocked
for multiple reasons.

But as for "relative statements", such as "I don't like the smell of your aftershave",
my answer to such a proclamation is "fuck you and the barge you sailed in on".
Statements like the above, mean nothing to me.

[Picture]

Loading Image...

Paul
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2025-02-17 05:28:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
There is nothing on Rufus to help bypass the requirement.
Even if there was, would you trust mission-critical business functions to
such unsupported software?
Joel
2025-02-17 15:22:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Paul
Post by Joel
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/
So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021. OK. Great. Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks.
Official support means, if you raise a bug that "my 8th gen Intel can't play Solitaire",
the support people at Microsoft can ignore you.
Whereas, instead of that extreme example, you're just using the thing at
home, your browser still runs, you're totally unaware of any such statements.
The only thing that won't run for sure right now, is if you boot
W11 24H2 on an E8400 Core2Duo, it's going to *crash* because it
does not have a SSE4.2 POPCNT instruction. There is nothing on
Rufus to help bypass the requirement. The MSFT installer checks whether
POPCNT support is present. That's an example of an "absolute prohibition".
I can tell people with confidence, that trying to install W11 on their
Optiplex 780, that's going to be blocked no matter what. Just as easily
as an attempt to install on a P4 or on an AthlonXP 3200 is going to be blocked
for multiple reasons.
But as for "relative statements", such as "I don't like the smell of your aftershave",
my answer to such a proclamation is "fuck you and the barge you sailed in on".
Statements like the above, mean nothing to me.
[Picture]
https://i.postimg.cc/1tf7bPNt/patching-all-working.gif
But the point is not that I couldn't run Win11 anymore, it's that it'd
*suck* to do so - whereas Linux is running like a dream.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
Paul
2025-02-17 20:11:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Joel
But the point is not that I couldn't run Win11 anymore, it's that it'd
*suck* to do so - whereas Linux is running like a dream.
I don't know what more I'd want to do here.

Run MacOS in a windows. I have an emulator, and since that
doesn't use virtualization, I can still do that, but I
have no wish to. That's based on an image taken from
the Mac G4 sitting next to me.

But there really isn't anything else that's a problem here.
I run Okular in both Windows and bash shell, as an example
of cats sleeping with dogs.

Anything that is "out of reach", is out of reach for
hardware reasons (not enough good PCIe slots), not because
of a software issue.

Paul
Anton Shepelev
2025-02-20 12:19:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Paul
I run Okular in both Windows and bash shell, as an example
of cats sleeping with dogs.
Impossible: Okural is a GUI program, not a terminal one.
--
() ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org -- against proprietary attachments
Paul
2025-02-20 14:00:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Anton Shepelev
Post by Paul
I run Okular in both Windows and bash shell, as an example
of cats sleeping with dogs.
Impossible: Okural is a GUI program, not a terminal one.
Possible.

The "bash shell", so called, has a graphics stack called WSLg.

I run Firefox in it every day :-) Linux Firefox. On Windows.

[Picture]

Loading Image...

Running Linux okular is just as easy as Linux Firefox, to operate.

I can run Windows, bash shell (linux kernel) container, VMWare,
and VirtualBox all at the same time. At one time, it wasn't advised
to do that, but all of that is running under an inverted hypervisor.
The Windows OS is virtualized, as is the bash shell, and the
two VM hosts. VirtualBox had to be modified to run under an
inverted hypervisor, and between VirtualBox running in Linux
and VirtualBox running in?/on? Windows, the Virtualbox developers
have to support two hypervisor environments.

There is no block diagram now, for Windows, showing the virtualization
model. We have to guess how it works.

The Task Manager isn't well suited for measuring the activity
on the machine. I monitor the electrical power consumption,
as a double check that nothing is going on that I cannot "see".

Paul


Paul


Paul
Anton Shepelev
2025-02-20 14:29:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Paul
Post by Anton Shepelev
Post by Paul
I run Okular in both Windows and bash shell
Impossible: Okural is a GUI program, not a terminal one.
Possible.
The "bash shell", so called, has a graphics stack called
WSLg.
I fear you misunderstand the terminology. In Microsoft's
"bash shell" is just a text shell, not an environment for
GUI programs. WSLg is not part of the shell.
Post by Paul
I run Firefox in it every day :-) Linux Firefox. On
Windows.
<https://i.postimg.cc/sDd22g3Q/bash-shell-WSLg-Firefox.gif>
Thanks. I wish, however, posing direct links to images were
part of the netiquette. This link opens not an image, but a
rather cluttered website /with/ an image. There are image
free anonymous image hostings supporting direct links, e.g.
<catbox.moe>.
Post by Paul
Running Linux okular is just as easy as Linux Firefox, to
operate. I can run Windows, bash shell (linux kernel)
container, VMWare, and VirtualBox all at the same time. At
one time, it wasn't advised to do that, but all of that is
running under an inverted hypervisor. The Windows OS is
virtualized, as is the bash shell, and the two VM hosts.
VirtualBox had to be modified to run under an inverted
hypervisor, and between VirtualBox running in Linux and
VirtualBox running in/on Windows, the Virtualbox
developers have to support two hypervisor environments.
Too much virualisation to my taste, and too little real
thing. Beware the legions of lobotomized Unices:

<https://czep.net/17/legion-of-lobotomized-unices.html>
--
() ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org -- against proprietary attachments
Paul
2025-02-20 17:27:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Anton Shepelev
Post by Paul
Post by Anton Shepelev
Post by Paul
I run Okular in both Windows and bash shell
Impossible: Okural is a GUI program, not a terminal one.
Possible.
The "bash shell", so called, has a graphics stack called
WSLg.
I fear you misunderstand the terminology. In Microsoft's
"bash shell" is just a text shell, not an environment for
GUI programs. WSLg is not part of the shell.
I fear you misunderstand the terminology.

As a rolling release, the product has evolved over time.

The original offering was "bash shell". It had no graphics.
Yet, within about three days of initial delivery, some people
on The Internet, had used XMing as a separate X11 server, and then ran Firefox
from the loaded distro in the Bash Shell product, using XMing for graphics.

I did not reproduce that effort immediately. I waited a bit
before I set up mine. The initial offering was on the Insider,
which is why this material is still sitting on the Insider drive
today. I have newer versions of the setup in other places.
But this was the first setup for me. I never upgraded or updated
this initial effort. It was left for the purpose we see today,
namely, taking a picture. That's why it is still there.

[Picture]

Loading Image...

The progression goes like this.

WSL1 - Just Bash

WSL1 + XMing - Now, you can run graphical packages from the installed distro

WSL2 - Containerized version (.vhd), resident Linux kernel

WSL2 + WSLg - Now, you no longer need XMing.

This is what you see in Bash today. A DISPLAY variable is already set today.
Post by Anton Shepelev
bash
$ echo $DISPLAY
:0
$ firefox & <=== Firefox immediately appears, rootless, on the Windows Desktop
Graphics are rendered by the WSLg stack (Terminal Services at
the top of the stack, as glue to the Windows desktop).

I can run Synaptic Package Manager, install additional packages in Bash Shell
without using Apt if I want. I can run Nautilus. And, I can run XEyes (just
because it bothers someone here...) .

Paul
rbowman
2025-02-20 19:50:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Paul
WSL2 + WSLg - Now, you no longer need XMing.
I don't have a lot of reference points but this appears to depend on which
Linux you installed. With OpenSUSE Leap WSLg and systemd are not available
by default. I had to run

zypper in -t pattern wsl_gui

before gVim would work.

https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:WSL


When I tested the Fedora 42 tarball Monday, a specific install wasn't
necessary to run Firefox, one of the GUI tests. I assume the default
Ubuntu also comes fully loaded.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2025-02-20 21:22:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Paul
The original offering was "bash shell".
“Bash” stands for “Bourne-Again SHell”. So what you have there is the
“bourne-again shell shell”.
Paul
2025-02-21 15:53:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Paul
The original offering was "bash shell".
“Bash” stands for “Bourne-Again SHell”. So what you have there is the
“bourne-again shell shell”.
I didn't pick the name for this thing.

I'm forced to use terminology that other
people in the group might recognize.

That's the shorthand for the "we don't know why they are doing Linux" project.
The original justification for doing it, was pretty lame.

There is probably only one other person than myself using it.
The audience here isn't really interested.

But if you want to have XEyes on your Windows desktop, you can.

[Picture]

Loading Image...

Paul
Kerr-Mudd, John
2025-02-21 18:10:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:53:10 -0500
Post by Paul
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Paul
The original offering was "bash shell".
“Bash” stands for “Bourne-Again SHell”. So what you have there is the
“bourne-again shell shell”.
I didn't pick the name for this thing.
I'm forced to use terminology that other
people in the group might recognize.
That's the shorthand for the "we don't know why they are doing Linux" project.
The original justification for doing it, was pretty lame.
There is probably only one other person than myself using it.
The audience here isn't really interested.
But if you want to have XEyes on your Windows desktop, you can.
[Picture]
https://i.postimg.cc/s2sSnJS9/xeyes-are-watching.gif
As Anton has said, that's not a picture, it's a web page with stuff that
might show you a picture.
--
Bah, and indeed Humbug.
Paul
2025-02-22 00:24:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:53:10 -0500
Post by Paul
Post by Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Post by Paul
The original offering was "bash shell".
“Bash” stands for “Bourne-Again SHell”. So what you have there is the
“bourne-again shell shell”.
I didn't pick the name for this thing.
I'm forced to use terminology that other
people in the group might recognize.
That's the shorthand for the "we don't know why they are doing Linux" project.
The original justification for doing it, was pretty lame.
There is probably only one other person than myself using it.
The audience here isn't really interested.
But if you want to have XEyes on your Windows desktop, you can.
[Picture]
https://i.postimg.cc/s2sSnJS9/xeyes-are-watching.gif
As Anton has said, that's not a picture, it's a web page with stuff that
might show you a picture.
Do you know why that caption is there ?

It's for a blind person!!!!!!!

Blind people use web browsers too. They use a screen reader.
If there is text on the web page, they can partake of whatever
is being discussed.

When I would post a picture, I was kindly asked if I might caption
the item, so it could be avoided entirely if the content was
just an image and no other information a blind person could
use was present.

THAT is why the caption is there.

Paul
Daniel70
2025-02-21 07:31:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On 21/02/2025 1:00 am, Paul wrote:

<Snip>
Paul
Paul
Paul
Bad stutter you've got there, Paul!! ;-P
--
Daniel70
Brian Gregory
2025-02-20 15:38:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Anton Shepelev
Post by Paul
I run Okular in both Windows and bash shell, as an example
of cats sleeping with dogs.
Impossible: Okural is a GUI program, not a terminal one.
WSL2 supports GUI programs now.
--
Brian Gregory (in England).
Joel
2025-02-20 16:23:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Brian Gregory
Post by Anton Shepelev
Post by Paul
I run Okular in both Windows and bash shell, as an example
of cats sleeping with dogs.
Impossible: Okural is a GUI program, not a terminal one.
WSL2 supports GUI programs now.
Yup, I tested WSL 2 by running GIMP, just to get a screenshot of a GUI
Linux app under Win11*, it does work. Kind of gimmicky, in terms of
its usefulness (like having the link to Windows from an Android phone,
it exists but is a drag on the device).

* Loading Image...
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
rbowman
2025-02-16 20:10:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Joel
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-
support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/
Post by Joel
So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021. OK. Great. Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks.
I guess that means there is no hope for the 4th gen i5 powering my Fedora
box?
Joel
2025-02-17 15:24:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Joel
Post by Joel
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-
support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/
Post by Joel
So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021. OK. Great. Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks.
I guess that means there is no hope for the 4th gen i5 powering my Fedora
box?
Just stick with Fedora. :)
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
rbowman
2025-02-17 18:52:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Joel
Post by Joel
Post by Joel
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-
official-
Post by Joel
Post by Joel
support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/
Post by Joel
So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021. OK. Great. Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks.
I guess that means there is no hope for the 4th gen i5 powering my
Fedora box?
Just stick with Fedora. :)
I plan to. I may even participate in the test day.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2025-02-17_WSL

The interesting part is a new WSL feature:

wsl --install --from-file .\path\to\Fedora.tar.xz

Previously the Linux versions came from the Microsoft Store. Now you can
install from a tarball.
Andy Burns
2025-02-21 08:13:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Joel
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/
So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021.
I presume everyone has smelled through the BS behind this story by now?

8/9/10th gen CPUs will not be supported by 24H2 for NEW installs by
OEMs, but end-users can upgrade older machines.

It's business as usual, MS pushes OEMs to keep the newer hardware train
rolling ...
Loading...